机载激光扫描探测海面高度

K. Julge, A. Gruno, A. Ellmann, A. Liibusk, T. Oja
{"title":"机载激光扫描探测海面高度","authors":"K. Julge, A. Gruno, A. Ellmann, A. Liibusk, T. Oja","doi":"10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resolution of satellite altimetry derived sea surface heights (SSH) is relatively low, whereas near coastal areas the data have poor accuracy. For monitoring SSH regionally, Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) in conjunction with kinematic GPS-positioning can be a more accurate and high-resolution alternative. A case study was carried out at the southern shores of Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea. An ALS profile flown at an altitude of ~400 m was used for SSH determination. Two different algorithms for ALS trajectory calculations were compared and clear systematic discrepancies between the two were determined. Also, significant variations in backscattering of ALS pulses yield large data gaps even with near ideal flight conditions. The causes for this phenomena were analyzed and a possible explanation given. The accuracy of the sea level corrected SSH results was validated with a regional geoid and sea surface models. The ALS derived SSH values agree within 2 cm (in terms of standard deviation) with the geoid model.","PeriodicalId":435850,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring sea surface heights by using Airborne Laser Scanning\",\"authors\":\"K. Julge, A. Gruno, A. Ellmann, A. Liibusk, T. Oja\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887853\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Resolution of satellite altimetry derived sea surface heights (SSH) is relatively low, whereas near coastal areas the data have poor accuracy. For monitoring SSH regionally, Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) in conjunction with kinematic GPS-positioning can be a more accurate and high-resolution alternative. A case study was carried out at the southern shores of Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea. An ALS profile flown at an altitude of ~400 m was used for SSH determination. Two different algorithms for ALS trajectory calculations were compared and clear systematic discrepancies between the two were determined. Also, significant variations in backscattering of ALS pulses yield large data gaps even with near ideal flight conditions. The causes for this phenomena were analyzed and a possible explanation given. The accuracy of the sea level corrected SSH results was validated with a regional geoid and sea surface models. The ALS derived SSH values agree within 2 cm (in terms of standard deviation) with the geoid model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887853\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE/OES Baltic International Symposium (BALTIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BALTIC.2014.6887853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

卫星测高所得海面高度(SSH)的分辨率相对较低,而靠近沿海地区的数据精度较差。为了监测区域SSH,机载激光扫描(ALS)与运动学gps定位相结合可以是更准确和高分辨率的替代方案。在波罗的海芬兰湾南岸进行了个案研究。在~400 m高度飞行的ALS剖面用于测定SSH。比较了两种不同的ALS轨迹计算算法,确定了两者之间明显的系统差异。此外,即使在接近理想的飞行条件下,ALS脉冲后向散射的显著变化也会产生很大的数据缺口。分析了造成这种现象的原因,并给出了可能的解释。用区域大地水准面模型和海面模型验证了海平面校正的海平面高度计算结果的准确性。ALS导出的SSH值与大地水准面模型的标准偏差在2 cm以内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring sea surface heights by using Airborne Laser Scanning
Resolution of satellite altimetry derived sea surface heights (SSH) is relatively low, whereas near coastal areas the data have poor accuracy. For monitoring SSH regionally, Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) in conjunction with kinematic GPS-positioning can be a more accurate and high-resolution alternative. A case study was carried out at the southern shores of Gulf of Finland, the Baltic Sea. An ALS profile flown at an altitude of ~400 m was used for SSH determination. Two different algorithms for ALS trajectory calculations were compared and clear systematic discrepancies between the two were determined. Also, significant variations in backscattering of ALS pulses yield large data gaps even with near ideal flight conditions. The causes for this phenomena were analyzed and a possible explanation given. The accuracy of the sea level corrected SSH results was validated with a regional geoid and sea surface models. The ALS derived SSH values agree within 2 cm (in terms of standard deviation) with the geoid model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Offshore spreading of buoyant bulge from numerical simulations and laboratory experiments Variations of sea surface temperature and ice conditions in the South-Eastern Baltic over the last decade Climatic change of the Baltic Sea level and sea surface temperature based on satellite altimetry and radiometry Satellite altimetry of large lakes of the Baltic Basin Gliders for studies of multi-scale variability in the Baltic Sea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1