直接付款条款与破产法中的欺诈原则:瑞宏土方有限公司(破产)

R. Wood
{"title":"直接付款条款与破产法中的欺诈原则:瑞宏土方有限公司(破产)","authors":"R. Wood","doi":"10.29173/ALR19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The “fraud against the bankruptcy law principle” provides that it is not lawful for parties to use contractual provisions to circumvent bankruptcy law. In England this principle has split into two distinct subrules – the pari passu rule which invalidates contractual provisions that alter the bankruptcy scheme of distribution, and anti-deprivation rule that invalidates provisions that withdraw an asset that would otherwise be available to satisfy the claims of creditors in insolvency proceedings. Canadian courts have not adopted a similar approach, and the decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Re Horizon Earthworks Ltd. (Bankrupt), which applied the principle in relation to a direct payment clause in a construction contract, provides an opportunity to examine how the common law and statutory rules governing this issue interact in Canada.","PeriodicalId":142986,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct Payment Clauses and the Fraud Upon the Bankruptcy Law Principle: Re Horizon Earthworks Ltd. (Bankrupt)\",\"authors\":\"R. Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.29173/ALR19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The “fraud against the bankruptcy law principle” provides that it is not lawful for parties to use contractual provisions to circumvent bankruptcy law. In England this principle has split into two distinct subrules – the pari passu rule which invalidates contractual provisions that alter the bankruptcy scheme of distribution, and anti-deprivation rule that invalidates provisions that withdraw an asset that would otherwise be available to satisfy the claims of creditors in insolvency proceedings. Canadian courts have not adopted a similar approach, and the decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Re Horizon Earthworks Ltd. (Bankrupt), which applied the principle in relation to a direct payment clause in a construction contract, provides an opportunity to examine how the common law and statutory rules governing this issue interact in Canada.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29173/ALR19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Private Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/ALR19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“破产法欺诈原则”规定当事人利用合同条款规避破产法是不合法的。在英国,这一原则已分裂为两个不同的子规则——同等权益规则,该规则使改变破产分配方案的合同条款无效;反剥夺规则,该规则使收回本来可用于在破产程序中满足债权人索赔的资产的条款无效。加拿大法院没有采用类似的做法,阿尔伯塔省上诉法院在Re Horizon Earthworks Ltd.(破产)一案中对建筑合同中的直接付款条款适用了这一原则,这为研究在加拿大管理这一问题的普通法和成文法如何相互作用提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Direct Payment Clauses and the Fraud Upon the Bankruptcy Law Principle: Re Horizon Earthworks Ltd. (Bankrupt)
The “fraud against the bankruptcy law principle” provides that it is not lawful for parties to use contractual provisions to circumvent bankruptcy law. In England this principle has split into two distinct subrules – the pari passu rule which invalidates contractual provisions that alter the bankruptcy scheme of distribution, and anti-deprivation rule that invalidates provisions that withdraw an asset that would otherwise be available to satisfy the claims of creditors in insolvency proceedings. Canadian courts have not adopted a similar approach, and the decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Re Horizon Earthworks Ltd. (Bankrupt), which applied the principle in relation to a direct payment clause in a construction contract, provides an opportunity to examine how the common law and statutory rules governing this issue interact in Canada.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Disability, Reasonable Accommodation and the Employer's Obligations: Nano Nagle School V Daly ‘Reasonable Offers’ as a Defence to Unfair Prejudice Petitions: Prescott v Potamianos The Problematic Development of the Stalking Protection Order Equal Civil Partnerships, Discrimination and the Indulgence of Time: R (on the Application of Steinfeld and Keidan) V Secretary of State for International Development Reason‐Giving in Administrative Law: Where are We and Why Have the Courts Not Embraced the ‘General Common Law Duty to Give Reasons’?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1