{"title":"Abogados (DCH) (Lawyers (DCH))","authors":"Esteban Llamosas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3312029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<b>Spanish Abstract:</b> El artículo estudia el oficio de abogado y su ejercicio en la justicia canónica de Hispanoamérica y Filipinas de los siglos XVI a XVIII, analizando sus cualidades, requisitos, reglas de conducta y obligaciones. A fin de definir y caracterizar el oficio, no sólo se considera la tradición normativa del ius commune y el derecho castellano, sino también la tratadística jurídica, canónica y moral, con especial énfasis en las particularidades indianas a través del uso de la legislación conciliar y sinodal local como fuente. El artículo inicia con la definición de abogado y su distinción de figuras cercanas, como la de los procuradores. Luego se describe la desconfianza inicial a su actuación, se presenta su formación universitaria y sus lecturas, así como los requisitos para abogar, las calidades personales exigidas (claridad, modestia, temor de Dios, prudencia), los impedimentos personales para ejercer el oficio y las prohibiciones durante su desempeño. <br><br><b>English Abstract:</b> The article examines the role and the exercise of the office of advocate in the canonical justice of Hispanic America and the Philippines from the 16th to the 18th centuries. In order to define and characterize the office, this article considers not only the normative tradition of the ius commune and Castilian law, but also legal, canonical and moral treatises. Special emphasis is placed on the Spanish Indies’ particularities, based on the analysis of the local conciliar and synodal legislation. The article begins with a definition of the office of advocate, focusing particularly on what distinguished it from related figures such as procurators. It then describes the initial mistrust of advocates, presents advocates’ university education and what books they read, and analyses the requirements for candidates to the office of advocate and their necessary personal qualities (clarity, modesty, fear of God, prudence), as well as the personal impediments to exercising the office and prohibitions during its performance.","PeriodicalId":221394,"journal":{"name":"Max Planck Institute for Legal History & Legal Theory Research Paper Series","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Max Planck Institute for Legal History & Legal Theory Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:本文研究了16至18世纪西班牙美洲和菲律宾的律师职业及其在规范司法中的实践,分析了其品质、要求、行为规则和义务。以定义和描述,不仅被视为法律上的普通法法律传统和西班牙语,也是法律tratadística、规范和道德,特别着重于利用特点indianas通过立法协调和地方sinodal源。本文首先介绍了律师的定义及其与律师等类似人物的区别。然后描述了最初对他的表演的不信任,介绍了他的大学教育和阅读,以及倡导的要求,要求的个人素质(清晰,谦虚,敬畏上帝,谨慎),行使职务的个人障碍和在表演期间的禁令。English Abstract: The检查条The role and The行使of The office of advocate in The justice of Hispanic America and The菲律宾meraka from The精简to The 8日centuries。为了界定和界定办公室,本条不仅考虑了普通法和卡斯提尔法的规范传统,而且还考虑了法律、规范和道德条约。特别强调is placed on the[印度群岛' particularities, based on the analysis of the local调解和synodal立法。本文首先对律师事务所进行了定义,特别着重于律师事务所与检察官等相关人物的区别。然后描述It the initial mistrust of倡导者,代表倡导者“university education and what books they read and非洲the requirements for们to the office of advocate及其个人必要qualities (clarity,谦逊、恐惧of God (prudence), as well as the impediments人员to行使the office和滥杀滥伤during its绩效。
Spanish Abstract: El artículo estudia el oficio de abogado y su ejercicio en la justicia canónica de Hispanoamérica y Filipinas de los siglos XVI a XVIII, analizando sus cualidades, requisitos, reglas de conducta y obligaciones. A fin de definir y caracterizar el oficio, no sólo se considera la tradición normativa del ius commune y el derecho castellano, sino también la tratadística jurídica, canónica y moral, con especial énfasis en las particularidades indianas a través del uso de la legislación conciliar y sinodal local como fuente. El artículo inicia con la definición de abogado y su distinción de figuras cercanas, como la de los procuradores. Luego se describe la desconfianza inicial a su actuación, se presenta su formación universitaria y sus lecturas, así como los requisitos para abogar, las calidades personales exigidas (claridad, modestia, temor de Dios, prudencia), los impedimentos personales para ejercer el oficio y las prohibiciones durante su desempeño.
English Abstract: The article examines the role and the exercise of the office of advocate in the canonical justice of Hispanic America and the Philippines from the 16th to the 18th centuries. In order to define and characterize the office, this article considers not only the normative tradition of the ius commune and Castilian law, but also legal, canonical and moral treatises. Special emphasis is placed on the Spanish Indies’ particularities, based on the analysis of the local conciliar and synodal legislation. The article begins with a definition of the office of advocate, focusing particularly on what distinguished it from related figures such as procurators. It then describes the initial mistrust of advocates, presents advocates’ university education and what books they read, and analyses the requirements for candidates to the office of advocate and their necessary personal qualities (clarity, modesty, fear of God, prudence), as well as the personal impediments to exercising the office and prohibitions during its performance.