多智能体系统的冲突解决:平衡最优性和学习速度

Aaron Rocha-Rocha, E. M. D. Cote, S. Hernández, E. Succar
{"title":"多智能体系统的冲突解决:平衡最优性和学习速度","authors":"Aaron Rocha-Rocha, E. M. D. Cote, S. Hernández, E. Succar","doi":"10.1109/MICAI.2012.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many real world applications demand solutions that are difficult to implement. It is common practice for system designers to recur to multiagent theory, where the problem at hand is broken in sub-problems and each is handled by an autonomous agent. Notwithstanding, new questions emerge, like How should a problem be broken? What the task of each agent should be? And What information should they need to process their task? In addition, conflicts between agents' partial solutions (actions) may arise as a consequence of their autonomy. In this spirit, another question would be how should conflicts be solved? In this paper we conduct a study to answer some of those questions under a multiagent learning framework. The proposed framework guarantees an optimal solution to the original problem, at the cost of a low learning speed, but can be tuned to balance learning speed and optimality. We present an experimental analysis that shows learning curves until convergence to optimality, illustrating the trade-offs between learning speeds and optimality.","PeriodicalId":348369,"journal":{"name":"2012 11th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflict Resolution in Multiagent Systems: Balancing Optimality and Learning Speed\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Rocha-Rocha, E. M. D. Cote, S. Hernández, E. Succar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MICAI.2012.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many real world applications demand solutions that are difficult to implement. It is common practice for system designers to recur to multiagent theory, where the problem at hand is broken in sub-problems and each is handled by an autonomous agent. Notwithstanding, new questions emerge, like How should a problem be broken? What the task of each agent should be? And What information should they need to process their task? In addition, conflicts between agents' partial solutions (actions) may arise as a consequence of their autonomy. In this spirit, another question would be how should conflicts be solved? In this paper we conduct a study to answer some of those questions under a multiagent learning framework. The proposed framework guarantees an optimal solution to the original problem, at the cost of a low learning speed, but can be tuned to balance learning speed and optimality. We present an experimental analysis that shows learning curves until convergence to optimality, illustrating the trade-offs between learning speeds and optimality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 11th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 11th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MICAI.2012.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 11th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MICAI.2012.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

许多现实世界的应用程序需要难以实现的解决方案。对于系统设计者来说,重复使用多智能体理论是一种常见的做法,在这种理论中,手头的问题被分解成子问题,每个子问题都由一个自主的智能体处理。尽管如此,新的问题还是出现了,比如一个问题应该如何解决?每个代理的任务应该是什么?他们需要什么信息来完成他们的任务?此外,代理的部分解决方案(行动)之间的冲突可能会由于其自主性而产生。本着这种精神,另一个问题是如何解决冲突?在本文中,我们进行了一项研究,以在多智能体学习框架下回答其中的一些问题。该框架以较低的学习速度为代价,保证了原始问题的最优解,但可以调整以平衡学习速度和最优性。我们提出了一个实验分析,显示了学习曲线,直到收敛到最优,说明了学习速度和最优性之间的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conflict Resolution in Multiagent Systems: Balancing Optimality and Learning Speed
Many real world applications demand solutions that are difficult to implement. It is common practice for system designers to recur to multiagent theory, where the problem at hand is broken in sub-problems and each is handled by an autonomous agent. Notwithstanding, new questions emerge, like How should a problem be broken? What the task of each agent should be? And What information should they need to process their task? In addition, conflicts between agents' partial solutions (actions) may arise as a consequence of their autonomy. In this spirit, another question would be how should conflicts be solved? In this paper we conduct a study to answer some of those questions under a multiagent learning framework. The proposed framework guarantees an optimal solution to the original problem, at the cost of a low learning speed, but can be tuned to balance learning speed and optimality. We present an experimental analysis that shows learning curves until convergence to optimality, illustrating the trade-offs between learning speeds and optimality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conflict Resolution in Multiagent Systems: Balancing Optimality and Learning Speed Improvement on Automatic Speech Recognition Using Micro-genetic Algorithm A Novel Speed Control for DC Motors: Sliding Mode Control, Fuzzy Inference System, Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms Middleware for Information Exchange in Heterogeneous Social Network Intrusion Detection Using Fuzzy Stochastic Local Search Classifier
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1