基于标杆实践的网络大学教育质量评价

Renata Marciniak, Cristina Cáliz Rivera
{"title":"基于标杆实践的网络大学教育质量评价","authors":"Renata Marciniak, Cristina Cáliz Rivera","doi":"10.1109/JICV53222.2021.9600302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Benchmarking is a tool that, through comparative evaluation, allows to obtain knowledge about the quality of online education in another university and to identify the reasons why better results are obtained in this one in order to apply them in the university itself. The purpose of this article is to analyze comparatively some initiatives of this type of benchmarking, focusing on the criteria proposed to evaluate the quality of online university education and to establish which the most relevant criteria for this evaluation are. The bibliographic review is synthesized, which deals with the comparative analysis of some initiatives carried out by institutions from different countries: universities, accreditation organizations and online education associations. The results of the analysis show that to date benchmarking is not very frequently applied to evaluate and improve the quality of online university education. The criteria used during benchmarking allow evaluating the quality level of different areas of online education, strategic management, institutional context, technological infrastructure, student satisfaction, teacher, pedagogical aspects, as well as the design, development and results of the course delivered online.","PeriodicalId":448299,"journal":{"name":"2021 XI International Conference on Virtual Campus (JICV)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality evaluation of online university education based on benchmarking practice\",\"authors\":\"Renata Marciniak, Cristina Cáliz Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/JICV53222.2021.9600302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Benchmarking is a tool that, through comparative evaluation, allows to obtain knowledge about the quality of online education in another university and to identify the reasons why better results are obtained in this one in order to apply them in the university itself. The purpose of this article is to analyze comparatively some initiatives of this type of benchmarking, focusing on the criteria proposed to evaluate the quality of online university education and to establish which the most relevant criteria for this evaluation are. The bibliographic review is synthesized, which deals with the comparative analysis of some initiatives carried out by institutions from different countries: universities, accreditation organizations and online education associations. The results of the analysis show that to date benchmarking is not very frequently applied to evaluate and improve the quality of online university education. The criteria used during benchmarking allow evaluating the quality level of different areas of online education, strategic management, institutional context, technological infrastructure, student satisfaction, teacher, pedagogical aspects, as well as the design, development and results of the course delivered online.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 XI International Conference on Virtual Campus (JICV)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 XI International Conference on Virtual Campus (JICV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/JICV53222.2021.9600302\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 XI International Conference on Virtual Campus (JICV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/JICV53222.2021.9600302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

标杆管理是一种工具,通过比较评估,可以获得关于另一所大学在线教育质量的知识,并确定在这所大学获得更好结果的原因,以便将其应用于大学本身。本文的目的是比较分析这类标杆的一些举措,重点是评估在线大学教育质量的标准,并确定哪些是最相关的评估标准。综合文献综述对不同国家的大学、认证机构和在线教育协会开展的一些倡议进行了比较分析。分析结果表明,到目前为止,标杆管理在评价和提高网络大学教育质量方面的应用并不多见。基准测试过程中使用的标准可以评估在线教育不同领域的质量水平,包括战略管理、机构背景、技术基础设施、学生满意度、教师、教学方面,以及在线课程的设计、开发和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality evaluation of online university education based on benchmarking practice
Benchmarking is a tool that, through comparative evaluation, allows to obtain knowledge about the quality of online education in another university and to identify the reasons why better results are obtained in this one in order to apply them in the university itself. The purpose of this article is to analyze comparatively some initiatives of this type of benchmarking, focusing on the criteria proposed to evaluate the quality of online university education and to establish which the most relevant criteria for this evaluation are. The bibliographic review is synthesized, which deals with the comparative analysis of some initiatives carried out by institutions from different countries: universities, accreditation organizations and online education associations. The results of the analysis show that to date benchmarking is not very frequently applied to evaluate and improve the quality of online university education. The criteria used during benchmarking allow evaluating the quality level of different areas of online education, strategic management, institutional context, technological infrastructure, student satisfaction, teacher, pedagogical aspects, as well as the design, development and results of the course delivered online.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptation of internships to the online modality. The case of the Faculty of Tourism of the University of Málaga Student Perspective on Virtual Education in Two Universities in Ecuador: A Survey Gender differences in the perceptions of the educational process of undergraduate student teachers Quality evaluation of online university education based on benchmarking practice Open Educational Resources Repositories OERR: a Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1