共同进化的股票市场交易基因程序

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management Pub Date : 2019-11-15 DOI:10.1002/isaf.1458
Jason F. Nicholls, Andries P. Engelbrecht
{"title":"共同进化的股票市场交易基因程序","authors":"Jason F. Nicholls,&nbsp;Andries P. Engelbrecht","doi":"10.1002/isaf.1458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The profitability of trading rules evolved by three different optimised genetic programs, namely a single population genetic program (GP), a co-operative co-evolved GP, and a competitive co-evolved GP is compared. Profitability is determined by trading thirteen listed shares on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) over a period of April 2003 to June 2008. An empirical study presented here shows that GPs can generate profitable trading rules across a variety of industries and market conditions. The results show that the co-operative co-evolved GP generates trading rules perform significantly worse than a single population GP and a competitively co-evolved GP. The results also show that a competitive co-evolved GP and the single population GP produce similar trading rules. The profits returned by the evolved trading rules are compared to the profit returned by the buy-and-hold trading strategy. The evolved trading rules significantly outperform the buy-and-hold strategy when the market trends downwards. No significant difference is identified among the buy-and-hold strategy, the competitive co-evolved GP, and single population GP when the market trends upwards.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53473,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management","volume":"26 3","pages":"117-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/isaf.1458","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-evolved genetic programs for stock market trading\",\"authors\":\"Jason F. Nicholls,&nbsp;Andries P. Engelbrecht\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/isaf.1458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The profitability of trading rules evolved by three different optimised genetic programs, namely a single population genetic program (GP), a co-operative co-evolved GP, and a competitive co-evolved GP is compared. Profitability is determined by trading thirteen listed shares on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) over a period of April 2003 to June 2008. An empirical study presented here shows that GPs can generate profitable trading rules across a variety of industries and market conditions. The results show that the co-operative co-evolved GP generates trading rules perform significantly worse than a single population GP and a competitively co-evolved GP. The results also show that a competitive co-evolved GP and the single population GP produce similar trading rules. The profits returned by the evolved trading rules are compared to the profit returned by the buy-and-hold trading strategy. The evolved trading rules significantly outperform the buy-and-hold strategy when the market trends downwards. No significant difference is identified among the buy-and-hold strategy, the competitive co-evolved GP, and single population GP when the market trends upwards.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"117-136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/isaf.1458\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/isaf.1458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/isaf.1458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

比较了单种群遗传方案、合作型遗传方案和竞争型遗传方案三种不同优化遗传方案演化出的交易规则的盈利能力。盈利能力是由2003年4月至2008年6月期间在约翰内斯堡证券交易所(JSE)交易的13只上市股票确定的。本文提出的一项实证研究表明,普通合伙人可以在各种行业和市场条件下产生有利可图的交易规则。结果表明,合作型协同进化GP生成交易规则的性能显著低于单种群GP和竞争型协同进化GP。结果还表明,竞争性共同进化GP和单种群GP产生了相似的交易规则。将改进后的交易规则所带来的利润与买入并持有交易策略所带来的利润进行比较。当市场趋向下行时,演化出的交易规则明显优于买入并持有策略。当市场呈上升趋势时,买入持有策略、竞争性共同进化GP和单一种群GP之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-evolved genetic programs for stock market trading

The profitability of trading rules evolved by three different optimised genetic programs, namely a single population genetic program (GP), a co-operative co-evolved GP, and a competitive co-evolved GP is compared. Profitability is determined by trading thirteen listed shares on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) over a period of April 2003 to June 2008. An empirical study presented here shows that GPs can generate profitable trading rules across a variety of industries and market conditions. The results show that the co-operative co-evolved GP generates trading rules perform significantly worse than a single population GP and a competitively co-evolved GP. The results also show that a competitive co-evolved GP and the single population GP produce similar trading rules. The profits returned by the evolved trading rules are compared to the profit returned by the buy-and-hold trading strategy. The evolved trading rules significantly outperform the buy-and-hold strategy when the market trends downwards. No significant difference is identified among the buy-and-hold strategy, the competitive co-evolved GP, and single population GP when the market trends upwards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
相关文献
二甲双胍通过HDAC6和FoxO3a转录调控肌肉生长抑制素诱导肌肉萎缩
IF 8.9 1区 医学Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and MusclePub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12833
Min Ju Kang, Ji Wook Moon, Jung Ok Lee, Ji Hae Kim, Eun Jeong Jung, Su Jin Kim, Joo Yeon Oh, Sang Woo Wu, Pu Reum Lee, Sun Hwa Park, Hyeon Soo Kim
具有疾病敏感单倍型的非亲属供体脐带血移植后的1型糖尿病
IF 3.2 3区 医学Journal of Diabetes InvestigationPub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13939
Kensuke Matsumoto, Taisuke Matsuyama, Ritsu Sumiyoshi, Matsuo Takuji, Tadashi Yamamoto, Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro
封面:蛋白质组学分析确定IRSp53和fastin是PRV输出和直接细胞-细胞传播的关键
IF 3.4 4区 生物学ProteomicsPub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201970201
Fei-Long Yu, Huan Miao, Jinjin Xia, Fan Jia, Huadong Wang, Fuqiang Xu, Lin Guo
来源期刊
Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management
Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management is a quarterly international journal which publishes original, high quality material dealing with all aspects of intelligent systems as they relate to the fields of accounting, economics, finance, marketing and management. In addition, the journal also is concerned with related emerging technologies, including big data, business intelligence, social media and other technologies. It encourages the development of novel technologies, and the embedding of new and existing technologies into applications of real, practical value. Therefore, implementation issues are of as much concern as development issues. The journal is designed to appeal to academics in the intelligent systems, emerging technologies and business fields, as well as to advanced practitioners who wish to improve the effectiveness, efficiency, or economy of their working practices. A special feature of the journal is the use of two groups of reviewers, those who specialize in intelligent systems work, and also those who specialize in applications areas. Reviewers are asked to address issues of originality and actual or potential impact on research, teaching, or practice in the accounting, finance, or management fields. Authors working on conceptual developments or on laboratory-based explorations of data sets therefore need to address the issue of potential impact at some level in submissions to the journal.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Evaluation of the Financial Distress of Hospitals Through Machine Learning: An Application of AI in Healthcare Industry The Technological Innovation of the Metaverse in Financial Sector: Current State, Opportunities, and Open Challenges Issue Information Liquidity forecasting at corporate and subsidiary levels using machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1