“知识破坏”概念探析

Alberto Ferraris, Francesco Antonio Perotti
{"title":"“知识破坏”概念探析","authors":"Alberto Ferraris, Francesco Antonio Perotti","doi":"10.1109/ICTMOD49425.2020.9380604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this short paper is to build theory and to stimulate further research on knowledge sabotage, the most extreme counterproductive behavior that hinders knowledge sharing. Following a comprehensive analysis of the literature, we identified nine original conceptual propositions which shape an innovative framework of individual-, group- and organizational-level factors. The proposed framework offers the key factors that are relevant for a better conceptualization of knowledge sabotage, thus representing a fertile ground for new empirical studies. Since the recent formalization of the \"sabotage\" of knowledge, this paper is the first that presents such influencing factors thus opening the way for a better understanding of the dynamics that inhibit knowledge sharing.","PeriodicalId":158303,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the concept of “knowledge sabotage”\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Ferraris, Francesco Antonio Perotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTMOD49425.2020.9380604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this short paper is to build theory and to stimulate further research on knowledge sabotage, the most extreme counterproductive behavior that hinders knowledge sharing. Following a comprehensive analysis of the literature, we identified nine original conceptual propositions which shape an innovative framework of individual-, group- and organizational-level factors. The proposed framework offers the key factors that are relevant for a better conceptualization of knowledge sabotage, thus representing a fertile ground for new empirical studies. Since the recent formalization of the \\\"sabotage\\\" of knowledge, this paper is the first that presents such influencing factors thus opening the way for a better understanding of the dynamics that inhibit knowledge sharing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158303,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMOD49425.2020.9380604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTMOD49425.2020.9380604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这篇短文的目的是建立理论,并促进对知识破坏的进一步研究,知识破坏是阻碍知识共享的最极端的反生产行为。在对文献进行全面分析之后,我们确定了九个原始的概念命题,它们形成了个人、群体和组织层面因素的创新框架。提出的框架提供了与更好地概念化知识破坏相关的关键因素,从而为新的实证研究提供了肥沃的土壤。自从最近对知识“破坏”的形式化以来,本文首次提出了这种影响因素,从而为更好地理解抑制知识共享的动态开辟了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the concept of “knowledge sabotage”
The purpose of this short paper is to build theory and to stimulate further research on knowledge sabotage, the most extreme counterproductive behavior that hinders knowledge sharing. Following a comprehensive analysis of the literature, we identified nine original conceptual propositions which shape an innovative framework of individual-, group- and organizational-level factors. The proposed framework offers the key factors that are relevant for a better conceptualization of knowledge sabotage, thus representing a fertile ground for new empirical studies. Since the recent formalization of the "sabotage" of knowledge, this paper is the first that presents such influencing factors thus opening the way for a better understanding of the dynamics that inhibit knowledge sharing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital transformation of Human Resources Management: A Roadmap Sharing Economy in a context of pandemic propagation : Case of the COVID19 The Two Phases Method for operating rooms planning and scheduling Exploring the concept of “knowledge sabotage” A Hierarchical Blockchain of Things Network For Unified Carbon Emission Trading (HBUETS):A Conceptual Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1