Tükör által

In the first part of the present study (East Asian Studies 2017:2) I examined thetechniques used by Meiji intellectuals in translating Western philosophicalterms. In the present paper, I widen the scope of that analysis by examiningthe problems of positioning Japan in the context of what is called “world history” in Western philosophical tradition. This was an extremely challengingtask, as most of the interpretations of Weltgeschichte placed “the East” as suchon the starting point of the historical progress. This idea cannot easily be harmonised with the notion of kokutai 国体, which seemed to be, on the otherhand, a prerequisite of building a Western-like “nation-state” in Japan. In thispaper I examine the ways in which leading Japanese intellectuals such asKatō Hiroyuki 加藤弘之, Mori Arinori 森有礼, Sakatani Shiroshi 坂谷素,Watsuji Tetsurō 和辻哲郎 and Nishida Kitarō 西田幾多郎 handled the tension between the “West” and the “East”, and how Japan was reflected in the“mirror” of the West in their writings.