通过关联驱动的应用相似度分析来修剪硬件评估空间

Rosario Cammarota, A. Kejariwal, P. D'Alberto, Sapan Panigrahi, A. Veidenbaum, A. Nicolau
{"title":"通过关联驱动的应用相似度分析来修剪硬件评估空间","authors":"Rosario Cammarota, A. Kejariwal, P. D'Alberto, Sapan Panigrahi, A. Veidenbaum, A. Nicolau","doi":"10.1145/2016604.2016610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System evaluation is routinely performed in industry to select one amongst a set of different systems to improve performance of proprietary applications. However, a wide range of system configurations is available every year on the market. This makes an exhaustive system evaluation progressively challenging and expensive.\n In this paper we propose a novel similarity-based methodology for system selection. Our methodology prunes the set of candidate systems by eliminating those systems that are likely to reduce performance of a given proprietary application. The pruning process relies on applications that are similar to a given application of interest whose performance on the candidte systems is known. This obviates the need to install and run the given application on each and every candidate system.\n The concept of similarity we introduce is performance centric. For a given application, we compute the Pearson's correlation between different types of resource stall and cycles per instruction. We refer to the vector of Pearson's correlation coefficients as an application signature. Next, we assess similarity between two applications as Spearman's correlation between their respective signature. We use the former type of correlation to quantify the association between pipeline stalls and cycles per instruction, whereas we use the latter type of correlation to quantify the association of two signatures, hence to assess similarity, based on the difference in terms of rank ordering of their components.\n We evaluate the proposed methodology on three different micro-architectures, viz., Intel's Harpertown, Nehalem and Westmere, using industry-standard SPEC CINT2006. We assess performance centric similarity among applications in SPEC CINT2006. We show how our methodology clusters applications with common performance issues. Finally, we show how to use the notion of similarity among applications to compare the three architectures with respect to a given Yahoo! property.","PeriodicalId":430420,"journal":{"name":"ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pruning hardware evaluation space via correlation-driven application similarity analysis\",\"authors\":\"Rosario Cammarota, A. Kejariwal, P. D'Alberto, Sapan Panigrahi, A. Veidenbaum, A. Nicolau\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2016604.2016610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"System evaluation is routinely performed in industry to select one amongst a set of different systems to improve performance of proprietary applications. However, a wide range of system configurations is available every year on the market. This makes an exhaustive system evaluation progressively challenging and expensive.\\n In this paper we propose a novel similarity-based methodology for system selection. Our methodology prunes the set of candidate systems by eliminating those systems that are likely to reduce performance of a given proprietary application. The pruning process relies on applications that are similar to a given application of interest whose performance on the candidte systems is known. This obviates the need to install and run the given application on each and every candidate system.\\n The concept of similarity we introduce is performance centric. For a given application, we compute the Pearson's correlation between different types of resource stall and cycles per instruction. We refer to the vector of Pearson's correlation coefficients as an application signature. Next, we assess similarity between two applications as Spearman's correlation between their respective signature. We use the former type of correlation to quantify the association between pipeline stalls and cycles per instruction, whereas we use the latter type of correlation to quantify the association of two signatures, hence to assess similarity, based on the difference in terms of rank ordering of their components.\\n We evaluate the proposed methodology on three different micro-architectures, viz., Intel's Harpertown, Nehalem and Westmere, using industry-standard SPEC CINT2006. We assess performance centric similarity among applications in SPEC CINT2006. We show how our methodology clusters applications with common performance issues. Finally, we show how to use the notion of similarity among applications to compare the three architectures with respect to a given Yahoo! property.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2016604.2016610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2016604.2016610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

系统评估通常在工业中执行,以便在一组不同的系统中选择一个来提高专有应用程序的性能。然而,市场上每年都有各种各样的系统配置可供选择。这使得详尽的系统评估变得越来越具有挑战性和昂贵。在本文中,我们提出了一种新的基于相似性的系统选择方法。我们的方法通过消除那些可能降低给定专有应用程序性能的系统来修剪候选系统集。修剪过程依赖于与特定应用程序相似的应用程序,这些应用程序在候选系统上的性能是已知的。这就避免了在每个候选系统上安装和运行给定应用程序的需要。我们引入的相似度概念是以性能为中心的。对于给定的应用程序,我们计算每个指令不同类型的资源失速和周期之间的Pearson相关性。我们将皮尔逊相关系数的向量称为应用签名。接下来,我们将两个应用程序之间的相似性评估为各自签名之间的Spearman相关性。我们使用前一种类型的相关性来量化每条指令的管道失速和周期之间的关联,而我们使用后一种类型的相关性来量化两个签名的关联,从而根据其组件的排名顺序的差异来评估相似性。我们使用行业标准SPEC CINT2006在三种不同的微架构(即英特尔的Harpertown、Nehalem和Westmere)上评估了所提出的方法。我们在SPEC CINT2006中评估应用程序之间以性能为中心的相似性。我们将展示我们的方法如何对具有常见性能问题的应用程序进行集群。最后,我们将展示如何使用应用程序之间的相似性概念来比较给定Yahoo!财产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pruning hardware evaluation space via correlation-driven application similarity analysis
System evaluation is routinely performed in industry to select one amongst a set of different systems to improve performance of proprietary applications. However, a wide range of system configurations is available every year on the market. This makes an exhaustive system evaluation progressively challenging and expensive. In this paper we propose a novel similarity-based methodology for system selection. Our methodology prunes the set of candidate systems by eliminating those systems that are likely to reduce performance of a given proprietary application. The pruning process relies on applications that are similar to a given application of interest whose performance on the candidte systems is known. This obviates the need to install and run the given application on each and every candidate system. The concept of similarity we introduce is performance centric. For a given application, we compute the Pearson's correlation between different types of resource stall and cycles per instruction. We refer to the vector of Pearson's correlation coefficients as an application signature. Next, we assess similarity between two applications as Spearman's correlation between their respective signature. We use the former type of correlation to quantify the association between pipeline stalls and cycles per instruction, whereas we use the latter type of correlation to quantify the association of two signatures, hence to assess similarity, based on the difference in terms of rank ordering of their components. We evaluate the proposed methodology on three different micro-architectures, viz., Intel's Harpertown, Nehalem and Westmere, using industry-standard SPEC CINT2006. We assess performance centric similarity among applications in SPEC CINT2006. We show how our methodology clusters applications with common performance issues. Finally, we show how to use the notion of similarity among applications to compare the three architectures with respect to a given Yahoo! property.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Strategies for improving performance and energy efficiency on a many-core Cost-effective soft-error protection for SRAM-based structures in GPGPUs Kinship: efficient resource management for performance and functionally asymmetric platforms An algorithm for parallel calculation of trigonometric functions DCNSim: a unified and cross-layer computer architecture simulation framework for data center network research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1