{"title":"新冠肺炎疫情期间网络仲裁作为商业纠纷解决方式的应用","authors":"N. Adiasih, Sandi Subagja, Dhany Rahmawan","doi":"10.4108/eai.3-8-2021.2315066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has brought changes in all areas, including the resolution of business disputes. One way of resolving business disputes can be through arbitration. The use of technology is a necessity in the transition from conventional dispute resolution models to online dispute resolution models, such as arbitration. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a study to determine the possibility of applying online arbitration in practice and regulation in Indonesia, by comparing its application in the United States and China. In this study, the researchers used a comparative law method. In addition, the data collected were secondary data. In this study, it is found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is possible to apply online arbitration as an alternative to business dispute resolution as stipulated in Article 4 Paragraph 3 of Indonesia’s Law No. 30/1999 that “In the event that it is agreed that dispute resolution is carried out through arbitration, it occurs in the form of an exchange of letters. Therefore, the sending of telex, telegram, facsimile, e-mail, or in other forms of communication means must be accompanied by a note of receipt by the concerned parties.” It is reinforced by Article 31 Paragraph 1 that “The parties to a firm and written agreement are free to determine the arbitration procedure used in the examination of the dispute as long as it does not conflict with the provisions of the law.” It includes conducting online arbitration. Online arbitration in the United States is organized by the American Arbitration Association (AAA). Since 2001, the organization has regulated that in carrying out online arbitration procedures, there is the main concept, namely that every online dispute will be made a site for the case. On the site, all files concerning cases and documents submitted by the parties will be stored. Meanwhile, in China, since 1 January 2015, the Online Arbitration Law has been enacted as a result of the development of e-commerce. Apart from that, China’s Online Arbitration Law states that disputes that can be resolved through online arbitration are disputes arising from economic transactions and other trade transactions based on the agreement of the parties.","PeriodicalId":210740,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2021, August 3, 2021, Malang, Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Application of Online Arbitration as an Alternative for Business Dispute Resolution During the COVID-19 Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"N. Adiasih, Sandi Subagja, Dhany Rahmawan\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/eai.3-8-2021.2315066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic has brought changes in all areas, including the resolution of business disputes. One way of resolving business disputes can be through arbitration. The use of technology is a necessity in the transition from conventional dispute resolution models to online dispute resolution models, such as arbitration. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a study to determine the possibility of applying online arbitration in practice and regulation in Indonesia, by comparing its application in the United States and China. In this study, the researchers used a comparative law method. In addition, the data collected were secondary data. In this study, it is found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is possible to apply online arbitration as an alternative to business dispute resolution as stipulated in Article 4 Paragraph 3 of Indonesia’s Law No. 30/1999 that “In the event that it is agreed that dispute resolution is carried out through arbitration, it occurs in the form of an exchange of letters. Therefore, the sending of telex, telegram, facsimile, e-mail, or in other forms of communication means must be accompanied by a note of receipt by the concerned parties.” It is reinforced by Article 31 Paragraph 1 that “The parties to a firm and written agreement are free to determine the arbitration procedure used in the examination of the dispute as long as it does not conflict with the provisions of the law.” It includes conducting online arbitration. Online arbitration in the United States is organized by the American Arbitration Association (AAA). Since 2001, the organization has regulated that in carrying out online arbitration procedures, there is the main concept, namely that every online dispute will be made a site for the case. On the site, all files concerning cases and documents submitted by the parties will be stored. Meanwhile, in China, since 1 January 2015, the Online Arbitration Law has been enacted as a result of the development of e-commerce. Apart from that, China’s Online Arbitration Law states that disputes that can be resolved through online arbitration are disputes arising from economic transactions and other trade transactions based on the agreement of the parties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2021, August 3, 2021, Malang, Indonesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2021, August 3, 2021, Malang, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-8-2021.2315066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First Lekantara Annual Conference on Public Administration, Literature, Social Sciences, Humanities, and Education, LePALISSHE 2021, August 3, 2021, Malang, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-8-2021.2315066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情给包括商业纠纷解决在内的各个领域带来了变化。解决商业纠纷的一种方法是通过仲裁。在从传统争议解决模式向在线争议解决模式(如仲裁)过渡的过程中,技术的使用是必要的。因此,有必要进行一项研究,通过比较其在美国和中国的应用情况,以确定在印度尼西亚的实践和监管中应用在线仲裁的可能性。在这项研究中,研究人员使用了比较法的方法。此外,所收集的数据均为二手数据。本研究发现,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,根据印度尼西亚第30/1999号法律第4条第3款的规定,有可能将在线仲裁作为商业争议解决的替代方案,“如果同意通过仲裁解决争议,则以交换信件的形式进行。”因此,以电传、电报、传真、电子邮件或者其他通信方式发出的,必须附有当事人的收条。”第31条第1款进一步规定:“在不违反法律规定的情况下,确定书面协议的当事人可以自由决定审查争议所采用的仲裁程序。”它包括进行在线仲裁。美国的在线仲裁是由美国仲裁协会(AAA)组织的。自2001年以来,该组织规定,在开展网上仲裁程序时,有一个主要的概念,即每一个网上争议都将成为一个案件的网站。所有与案件有关的档案和当事人提交的文件都将存储在该网站上。与此同时,在中国,由于电子商务的发展,自2015年1月1日起,《网络仲裁法》已经颁布。除此之外,中国的《网络仲裁法》规定,可以通过网络仲裁解决的争议是指双方当事人协议的经济交易和其他贸易交易中发生的争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Application of Online Arbitration as an Alternative for Business Dispute Resolution During the COVID-19 Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought changes in all areas, including the resolution of business disputes. One way of resolving business disputes can be through arbitration. The use of technology is a necessity in the transition from conventional dispute resolution models to online dispute resolution models, such as arbitration. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a study to determine the possibility of applying online arbitration in practice and regulation in Indonesia, by comparing its application in the United States and China. In this study, the researchers used a comparative law method. In addition, the data collected were secondary data. In this study, it is found that during the COVID-19 pandemic, it is possible to apply online arbitration as an alternative to business dispute resolution as stipulated in Article 4 Paragraph 3 of Indonesia’s Law No. 30/1999 that “In the event that it is agreed that dispute resolution is carried out through arbitration, it occurs in the form of an exchange of letters. Therefore, the sending of telex, telegram, facsimile, e-mail, or in other forms of communication means must be accompanied by a note of receipt by the concerned parties.” It is reinforced by Article 31 Paragraph 1 that “The parties to a firm and written agreement are free to determine the arbitration procedure used in the examination of the dispute as long as it does not conflict with the provisions of the law.” It includes conducting online arbitration. Online arbitration in the United States is organized by the American Arbitration Association (AAA). Since 2001, the organization has regulated that in carrying out online arbitration procedures, there is the main concept, namely that every online dispute will be made a site for the case. On the site, all files concerning cases and documents submitted by the parties will be stored. Meanwhile, in China, since 1 January 2015, the Online Arbitration Law has been enacted as a result of the development of e-commerce. Apart from that, China’s Online Arbitration Law states that disputes that can be resolved through online arbitration are disputes arising from economic transactions and other trade transactions based on the agreement of the parties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Analysis of Financial Sustainability Ratio on Rural Banks in Indonesia Optimizing Income Tax and Value Added Tax on E-Commerce Transaction The Effect of Violation, Personal Costs, and Professional Commitment on Whistleblowing Intention The Effect of Servant Leadership on Work Engagement and Affective Commitment Mediated by Job Satisfaction on Education Staff at Private Universities in West Jakarta The Influence of Cultural Traditions on the Design of the Furniture in the Dressing Room at Puro Mangkunegaran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1