抽象系统和协议规范的形式化验证

Axel Schneider, T. Bluhm, Tobias Renner, U. Heinkel, Joachim Knäblein, Reynaldo Zavala
{"title":"抽象系统和协议规范的形式化验证","authors":"Axel Schneider, T. Bluhm, Tobias Renner, U. Heinkel, Joachim Knäblein, Reynaldo Zavala","doi":"10.1109/SEW.2006.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formal methods such as automated model checking are used commercially for digital circuit design verification. These techniques find errors early in the product cycle, which improves development time and cost. By contrast, the current practice in complex system design is to specify system functions and protocol details in natural language. Some errors are found early by manual inspections, but others are only revealed during implementation testing or by costly field failures. We describe our application of formal specification and model checking to real telecom product development, and enumerate the classes of specification errors that these formal techniques revealed at an early stage of the development cycle","PeriodicalId":127158,"journal":{"name":"2006 30th Annual IEEE/NASA Software Engineering Workshop","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Verification of Abstract System and Protocol Specifications\",\"authors\":\"Axel Schneider, T. Bluhm, Tobias Renner, U. Heinkel, Joachim Knäblein, Reynaldo Zavala\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SEW.2006.19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Formal methods such as automated model checking are used commercially for digital circuit design verification. These techniques find errors early in the product cycle, which improves development time and cost. By contrast, the current practice in complex system design is to specify system functions and protocol details in natural language. Some errors are found early by manual inspections, but others are only revealed during implementation testing or by costly field failures. We describe our application of formal specification and model checking to real telecom product development, and enumerate the classes of specification errors that these formal techniques revealed at an early stage of the development cycle\",\"PeriodicalId\":127158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 30th Annual IEEE/NASA Software Engineering Workshop\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 30th Annual IEEE/NASA Software Engineering Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEW.2006.19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 30th Annual IEEE/NASA Software Engineering Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEW.2006.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

正式的方法,如自动模型检查被商业上用于数字电路设计验证。这些技术可以在产品周期的早期发现错误,从而改善开发时间和成本。相比之下,目前复杂系统设计的做法是用自然语言来指定系统功能和协议细节。有些错误可以通过人工检查早期发现,但其他错误仅在实现测试期间或昂贵的现场故障中发现。我们描述了形式化规范和模型检查在实际电信产品开发中的应用,并列举了这些形式化技术在开发周期的早期阶段所揭示的规范错误的类别
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Formal Verification of Abstract System and Protocol Specifications
Formal methods such as automated model checking are used commercially for digital circuit design verification. These techniques find errors early in the product cycle, which improves development time and cost. By contrast, the current practice in complex system design is to specify system functions and protocol details in natural language. Some errors are found early by manual inspections, but others are only revealed during implementation testing or by costly field failures. We describe our application of formal specification and model checking to real telecom product development, and enumerate the classes of specification errors that these formal techniques revealed at an early stage of the development cycle
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What Have We Not Learned about Teaching Programming? Using Simulation to Validate Style-Specific Architectural Refactoring Patterns The Role of Empirical Study in Software Engineering Formal Verification of Abstract System and Protocol Specifications Targeting Prediction: Engineering a Distributed Event Processor for an Autonomic Biometric System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1