网络跨境消费者合同中消费者权益与商业利益的平衡

Mathijs H. Ten Wolde
{"title":"网络跨境消费者合同中消费者权益与商业利益的平衡","authors":"Mathijs H. Ten Wolde","doi":"10.21098/jcli.v1i1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protection of consumers as weaker parties is an important goal in Indonesian society and in Indonesian law. The same applies to the EU Member States. When it comes to crossborder consumer contracts, special rules are needed to ensure this goal can still be achieved. In this regard the European Union developed rules on jurisdiction and applicable law which apply both to situations exclusively connected with EU Member States and to international situations connected with third countries. The Brussels I Regulation pursues an objective of legal certainty which consists in strengthening the legal protection of persons established inthe European Union, by enabling the applicant to easily identify the court in which he may sue and the defendant reasonably to foresee before which court, he may be sued. The Rome I Regulation does the same for the law regulating the protection of the consumer. This way both the aims of protection of the weaker consumer and legal certainty on the side of the commercial party go hand in hand. Where legal certainty is an important precondition for international trade and thus for a nation’s economy, clear rules are needed. By presenting the EU rules in the dynamics of the caselaw of the European Court of Justice, this article aimsto contribute to the discussion on how future cross-border consumer protecting regulations could be shaped in Indonesia and ASEAN.","PeriodicalId":292753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing Consumer Rights and Business Interests in Online Cross-Border Consumer Contracts\",\"authors\":\"Mathijs H. Ten Wolde\",\"doi\":\"10.21098/jcli.v1i1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protection of consumers as weaker parties is an important goal in Indonesian society and in Indonesian law. The same applies to the EU Member States. When it comes to crossborder consumer contracts, special rules are needed to ensure this goal can still be achieved. In this regard the European Union developed rules on jurisdiction and applicable law which apply both to situations exclusively connected with EU Member States and to international situations connected with third countries. The Brussels I Regulation pursues an objective of legal certainty which consists in strengthening the legal protection of persons established inthe European Union, by enabling the applicant to easily identify the court in which he may sue and the defendant reasonably to foresee before which court, he may be sued. The Rome I Regulation does the same for the law regulating the protection of the consumer. This way both the aims of protection of the weaker consumer and legal certainty on the side of the commercial party go hand in hand. Where legal certainty is an important precondition for international trade and thus for a nation’s economy, clear rules are needed. By presenting the EU rules in the dynamics of the caselaw of the European Court of Justice, this article aimsto contribute to the discussion on how future cross-border consumer protecting regulations could be shaped in Indonesia and ASEAN.\",\"PeriodicalId\":292753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v1i1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v1i1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护作为弱势方的消费者是印尼社会和印尼法律的一个重要目标。这同样适用于欧盟成员国。当涉及到跨境消费者合同时,需要特殊的规则来确保这一目标仍然可以实现。在这方面,欧洲联盟制定了关于管辖权和适用法律的规则,这些规则既适用于只与欧盟成员国有关的情况,也适用于与第三国有关的国际情况。《布鲁塞尔I条例》追求的是法律确定性的目标,包括加强对在欧盟设立的人的法律保护,使申请人能够容易地确定他可以起诉的法院,而被告能够合理地预见他可能在哪个法院被起诉。《罗马一号条例》同样适用于规范保护消费者的法律。这样一来,保护弱势消费者的目标和商业一方的法律确定性就能齐头并进。在法律确定性是国际贸易乃至一国经济的重要先决条件的地方,明确的规则是必要的。通过在欧洲法院判例法的动态中介绍欧盟规则,本文旨在促进关于如何在印度尼西亚和东盟塑造未来跨境消费者保护法规的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balancing Consumer Rights and Business Interests in Online Cross-Border Consumer Contracts
Protection of consumers as weaker parties is an important goal in Indonesian society and in Indonesian law. The same applies to the EU Member States. When it comes to crossborder consumer contracts, special rules are needed to ensure this goal can still be achieved. In this regard the European Union developed rules on jurisdiction and applicable law which apply both to situations exclusively connected with EU Member States and to international situations connected with third countries. The Brussels I Regulation pursues an objective of legal certainty which consists in strengthening the legal protection of persons established inthe European Union, by enabling the applicant to easily identify the court in which he may sue and the defendant reasonably to foresee before which court, he may be sued. The Rome I Regulation does the same for the law regulating the protection of the consumer. This way both the aims of protection of the weaker consumer and legal certainty on the side of the commercial party go hand in hand. Where legal certainty is an important precondition for international trade and thus for a nation’s economy, clear rules are needed. By presenting the EU rules in the dynamics of the caselaw of the European Court of Justice, this article aimsto contribute to the discussion on how future cross-border consumer protecting regulations could be shaped in Indonesia and ASEAN.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OPTIMAL CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY DESIGN FOR EMERGING ECONOMIES LEGAL PROTECTION OF BANK INDONESIA’S FINANCIAL INDEPENDENCE DO POLITICALLY CONNECTED BANKS PERFORM BETTER IN A DEMOCRATIC ENVIRONMENT? INCREASING FISCAL AND ECONOMIC RESILIENCE POST PANDEMIC: EVIDENCE FROM SOUTH ASIAN COUNTRIES MAPPING CENTRAL BANK DIGITAL CURRENCY LITERATURE: LESSONS FOR GOVERNMENTS AND RESEARCH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1