老年双体的接地方式——一项探索性研究

A. Takeoka, Atsushi Shimojima
{"title":"老年双体的接地方式——一项探索性研究","authors":"A. Takeoka, Atsushi Shimojima","doi":"10.3115/1118121.1118145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports an exploratory study of the grounding styles of older dyads, namely, the characteristic ways in which they mutually agree to have shared a piece of information in dialogue. On the basis of Traum's classification of grounding acts, we conducted an exploratory comparison of dialogue data on older and younger dyads, and found that a fairly clear contrast holds mainly in the types of acknowledgement utterances used by the two groups. We will discuss the implications of this contrast, concerning how some of the negative stereotypes about conversations with older people may arise from this difference in grounding styles.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grounding styles of aged dyads - an exploratory study\",\"authors\":\"A. Takeoka, Atsushi Shimojima\",\"doi\":\"10.3115/1118121.1118145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports an exploratory study of the grounding styles of older dyads, namely, the characteristic ways in which they mutually agree to have shared a piece of information in dialogue. On the basis of Traum's classification of grounding acts, we conducted an exploratory comparison of dialogue data on older and younger dyads, and found that a fairly clear contrast holds mainly in the types of acknowledgement utterances used by the two groups. We will discuss the implications of this contrast, concerning how some of the negative stereotypes about conversations with older people may arise from this difference in grounding styles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3115/1118121.1118145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1118121.1118145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文报告了一项关于老年二人组的基础风格的探索性研究,即他们在对话中相互同意分享一条信息的特征方式。在Traum的接地行为分类的基础上,我们探索性地比较了老年人和年轻人的对话数据,发现两组人使用的确认话语类型存在着相当明显的差异。我们将讨论这种对比的含义,关于与老年人交谈的一些负面刻板印象是如何从这种接地风格的差异中产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Grounding styles of aged dyads - an exploratory study
This paper reports an exploratory study of the grounding styles of older dyads, namely, the characteristic ways in which they mutually agree to have shared a piece of information in dialogue. On the basis of Traum's classification of grounding acts, we conducted an exploratory comparison of dialogue data on older and younger dyads, and found that a fairly clear contrast holds mainly in the types of acknowledgement utterances used by the two groups. We will discuss the implications of this contrast, concerning how some of the negative stereotypes about conversations with older people may arise from this difference in grounding styles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Information State-Based Dialogue Manager for Call for Fire Dialogues A computational model of multi-modal grounding for human robot interaction Classification of Discourse Coherence Relations: An Exploratory Study using Multiple Knowledge Sources Balancing Conflicting Factors in Argument Interpretation Semantic and Pragmatic Presupposition in Discourse Representation Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1