EE6:“硬件设计师如何重获关注?”

S. Pamarti, M. Chen, N. Krishnapura
{"title":"EE6:“硬件设计师如何重获关注?”","authors":"S. Pamarti, M. Chen, N. Krishnapura","doi":"10.1109/isscc.2019.8662518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the end of Moore’s Law and Dennard Scaling, domain-specific architecture remains the only viable path to continue scaling computing performance. In this era of domain-specific hardware, differentiation will come primarily from efficient hardware design and hardware designers, and the system level will play a key role. Domain specific hardware achieves its performance from massive parallelism, specialized data types and operations, fine-grained memory systems, and efficient interconnection networks. The latter two, memory and interconnect, are domain independent and will be provided by general-purpose platforms, such as GPUs. Hardware system designers will differentiate their products via algorithm-hardware co-design, and the design of special purpose units that provide the data-type and operation specialization – like the TensorCores and RTCores in a Turing GPU. hardware and software accelerate demanding applications, including machine learning, bioinformatics, and logical designing innovative and efficient experimental computing systems. microprocessor hardware MOSSIM Simulation and the Torus wormhole routing and virtual-channel flow control. J-Machine and the M-Machine, experimental parallel computer systems the separation of mechanisms from programming models and very low overhead synchronization and communication mechanisms. the Imagine processor, the concepts of stream processing and partitioned register organizations, the Merrimac supercomputer, to GPU computing, and the ELM low-power processor. National Academy Engineering productivity has not kept pace with Moore’s Law, leading to prohibitive increases in development costs and team sizes for leading edge SoCs. The main strategy for managing complexity in today’s SoCs is through design reuse of proprietary licensed intellectual property (IP) modules. The current IP reuse approach has markedly improved productivity, but the single layer point-to-point approach has limited the scope of reuse and abstraction. A pathway to revolutionizing SoC design is to copy the software design community, where open source has enabled a deep software hierarchy with many abstraction layers, significantly increasing productivity. Open source technology forms the foundation of fields like machine learning that are moving forward at an astounding rate. The adoption of an open source culture within the circuit design community would speed up the circuit innovation cycle, while democratizing access to specialized circuits needed to create state-of-the-art mixed-signal systems. Andreas Olofsson is DARPA the Microsystems Technology Office. His include intelligent design automation, system optimization, and open hardware. Prior to his at DARPA, Mr. Olofsson 20 to designing and testing low-power processors and mixed-signal circuits at Texas Instruments, Analog Devices, and Adapteva. Chip products designed by Mr. Olofsson include low-power digital signal processors (DSPs), charge-coupled device (CCD) readout circuits, and massively parallel reduced instruction set computing (RISC) processors. From 2008 to 2016, Mr. Olofsson the CEO of Adapteva, where he the Epiphany architecture and Parallella open-source computer. The Parallella democratized access to parallel computing and catalyzed the of a community of 10,000 developers and 200 across the globe. Mr. Olofsson in and Electrical and in Electrical Engineering the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Olofsson is a Member of the IEEE and holds nine U.S. patents.","PeriodicalId":265551,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC)","volume":"43 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EE6: \\\"How Can Hardware Designers Reclaim the Spotlight?\\\"\",\"authors\":\"S. Pamarti, M. Chen, N. Krishnapura\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/isscc.2019.8662518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the end of Moore’s Law and Dennard Scaling, domain-specific architecture remains the only viable path to continue scaling computing performance. In this era of domain-specific hardware, differentiation will come primarily from efficient hardware design and hardware designers, and the system level will play a key role. Domain specific hardware achieves its performance from massive parallelism, specialized data types and operations, fine-grained memory systems, and efficient interconnection networks. The latter two, memory and interconnect, are domain independent and will be provided by general-purpose platforms, such as GPUs. Hardware system designers will differentiate their products via algorithm-hardware co-design, and the design of special purpose units that provide the data-type and operation specialization – like the TensorCores and RTCores in a Turing GPU. hardware and software accelerate demanding applications, including machine learning, bioinformatics, and logical designing innovative and efficient experimental computing systems. microprocessor hardware MOSSIM Simulation and the Torus wormhole routing and virtual-channel flow control. J-Machine and the M-Machine, experimental parallel computer systems the separation of mechanisms from programming models and very low overhead synchronization and communication mechanisms. the Imagine processor, the concepts of stream processing and partitioned register organizations, the Merrimac supercomputer, to GPU computing, and the ELM low-power processor. National Academy Engineering productivity has not kept pace with Moore’s Law, leading to prohibitive increases in development costs and team sizes for leading edge SoCs. The main strategy for managing complexity in today’s SoCs is through design reuse of proprietary licensed intellectual property (IP) modules. The current IP reuse approach has markedly improved productivity, but the single layer point-to-point approach has limited the scope of reuse and abstraction. A pathway to revolutionizing SoC design is to copy the software design community, where open source has enabled a deep software hierarchy with many abstraction layers, significantly increasing productivity. Open source technology forms the foundation of fields like machine learning that are moving forward at an astounding rate. The adoption of an open source culture within the circuit design community would speed up the circuit innovation cycle, while democratizing access to specialized circuits needed to create state-of-the-art mixed-signal systems. Andreas Olofsson is DARPA the Microsystems Technology Office. His include intelligent design automation, system optimization, and open hardware. Prior to his at DARPA, Mr. Olofsson 20 to designing and testing low-power processors and mixed-signal circuits at Texas Instruments, Analog Devices, and Adapteva. Chip products designed by Mr. Olofsson include low-power digital signal processors (DSPs), charge-coupled device (CCD) readout circuits, and massively parallel reduced instruction set computing (RISC) processors. From 2008 to 2016, Mr. Olofsson the CEO of Adapteva, where he the Epiphany architecture and Parallella open-source computer. The Parallella democratized access to parallel computing and catalyzed the of a community of 10,000 developers and 200 across the globe. Mr. Olofsson in and Electrical and in Electrical Engineering the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Olofsson is a Member of the IEEE and holds nine U.S. patents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC)\",\"volume\":\"43 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/isscc.2019.8662518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Solid- State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/isscc.2019.8662518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着摩尔定律和登纳德缩放的终结,特定领域架构仍然是继续扩展计算性能的唯一可行途径。在这个特定领域硬件的时代,差异化将主要来自于高效的硬件设计和硬件设计师,而系统级别将发挥关键作用。特定领域的硬件通过大规模并行性、专用数据类型和操作、细粒度内存系统和高效互连网络来实现其性能。后两者,内存和互连,是独立于领域的,将由通用平台提供,如gpu。硬件系统设计师将通过算法-硬件协同设计,以及提供数据类型和操作专业化的特殊用途单元的设计来区分他们的产品,例如图灵GPU中的TensorCores和RTCores。硬件和软件加速要求苛刻的应用,包括机器学习,生物信息学和逻辑设计创新和高效的实验计算系统。微处理器硬件MOSSIM仿真及环面虫洞路由和虚拟通道流量控制。J-Machine和M-Machine是实验性并行计算机系统,它们将机制与编程模型分离,并且具有非常低开销的同步和通信机制。Imagine处理器、流处理和分区寄存器组织的概念、Merrimac超级计算机、GPU计算和ELM低功耗处理器。国家工程院的生产力没有跟上摩尔定律的步伐,导致开发成本和领先soc的团队规模的令人生畏的增长。当今soc中管理复杂性的主要策略是通过设计重用专有许可知识产权(IP)模块。当前的IP重用方法显著提高了生产率,但是单层的点对点方法限制了重用和抽象的范围。革新SoC设计的一个途径是复制软件设计社区,其中开源已经实现了具有许多抽象层的深层软件层次,显著提高了生产力。开源技术构成了机器学习等领域的基础,这些领域正以惊人的速度向前发展。在电路设计社区中采用开源文化将加快电路创新周期,同时使创建最先进的混合信号系统所需的专业电路的访问民主化。Andreas Olofsson是DARPA微系统技术办公室的工作人员。其中包括智能设计自动化、系统优化和开放硬件。在DARPA任职之前,他曾在Texas Instruments、Analog Devices和Adapteva设计和测试低功耗处理器和混合信号电路。Olofsson先生设计的芯片产品包括低功耗数字信号处理器(dsp)、电荷耦合器件(CCD)读出电路和大规模并行精简指令集计算(RISC)处理器。2008年至2016年,Olofsson先生担任Adapteva的首席执行官,在那里他负责Epiphany架构和parallelella开源计算机。parallelella使并行计算的访问民主化,并催化了一个由全球10,000名开发人员和200名开发人员组成的社区。Olofsson先生在宾夕法尼亚大学从事电气和电气工程。Olofsson先生是IEEE的成员,拥有9项美国专利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EE6: "How Can Hardware Designers Reclaim the Spotlight?"
With the end of Moore’s Law and Dennard Scaling, domain-specific architecture remains the only viable path to continue scaling computing performance. In this era of domain-specific hardware, differentiation will come primarily from efficient hardware design and hardware designers, and the system level will play a key role. Domain specific hardware achieves its performance from massive parallelism, specialized data types and operations, fine-grained memory systems, and efficient interconnection networks. The latter two, memory and interconnect, are domain independent and will be provided by general-purpose platforms, such as GPUs. Hardware system designers will differentiate their products via algorithm-hardware co-design, and the design of special purpose units that provide the data-type and operation specialization – like the TensorCores and RTCores in a Turing GPU. hardware and software accelerate demanding applications, including machine learning, bioinformatics, and logical designing innovative and efficient experimental computing systems. microprocessor hardware MOSSIM Simulation and the Torus wormhole routing and virtual-channel flow control. J-Machine and the M-Machine, experimental parallel computer systems the separation of mechanisms from programming models and very low overhead synchronization and communication mechanisms. the Imagine processor, the concepts of stream processing and partitioned register organizations, the Merrimac supercomputer, to GPU computing, and the ELM low-power processor. National Academy Engineering productivity has not kept pace with Moore’s Law, leading to prohibitive increases in development costs and team sizes for leading edge SoCs. The main strategy for managing complexity in today’s SoCs is through design reuse of proprietary licensed intellectual property (IP) modules. The current IP reuse approach has markedly improved productivity, but the single layer point-to-point approach has limited the scope of reuse and abstraction. A pathway to revolutionizing SoC design is to copy the software design community, where open source has enabled a deep software hierarchy with many abstraction layers, significantly increasing productivity. Open source technology forms the foundation of fields like machine learning that are moving forward at an astounding rate. The adoption of an open source culture within the circuit design community would speed up the circuit innovation cycle, while democratizing access to specialized circuits needed to create state-of-the-art mixed-signal systems. Andreas Olofsson is DARPA the Microsystems Technology Office. His include intelligent design automation, system optimization, and open hardware. Prior to his at DARPA, Mr. Olofsson 20 to designing and testing low-power processors and mixed-signal circuits at Texas Instruments, Analog Devices, and Adapteva. Chip products designed by Mr. Olofsson include low-power digital signal processors (DSPs), charge-coupled device (CCD) readout circuits, and massively parallel reduced instruction set computing (RISC) processors. From 2008 to 2016, Mr. Olofsson the CEO of Adapteva, where he the Epiphany architecture and Parallella open-source computer. The Parallella democratized access to parallel computing and catalyzed the of a community of 10,000 developers and 200 across the globe. Mr. Olofsson in and Electrical and in Electrical Engineering the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Olofsson is a Member of the IEEE and holds nine U.S. patents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
27.2 An Adiabatic Sense and Set Rectifier for Improved Maximum-Power-Point Tracking in Piezoelectric Harvesting with 541% Energy Extraction Gain 22.7 A Programmable Wireless EEG Monitoring SoC with Open/Closed-Loop Optogenetic and Electrical Stimulation for Epilepsy Control 2.5 A 40×40 Four-Neighbor Time-Based In-Memory Computing Graph ASIC Chip Featuring Wavefront Expansion and 2D Gradient Control 11.2 A CMOS Biosensor Array with 1024 3-Electrode Voltammetry Pixels and 93dB Dynamic Range 11.3 A Capacitive Biosensor for Cancer Diagnosis Using a Functionalized Microneedle and a 13.7b-Resolution Capacitance-to-Digital Converter from 1 to 100nF
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1