一种度量保证案例中可信度和不确定性的新方法

Alvine Boaye Belle, T. Lethbridge, Sègla Kpodjedo, O. Adesina, Miguel Garzón
{"title":"一种度量保证案例中可信度和不确定性的新方法","authors":"Alvine Boaye Belle, T. Lethbridge, Sègla Kpodjedo, O. Adesina, Miguel Garzón","doi":"10.1109/REW.2019.00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assurance cases are a well-established structured technique used to document a reasoned, auditable argument supporting that a system meets desirable properties (e.g., safety or security). Assurance cases are increasingly becoming popular, and are being used to make safety and cyber-security arguments about medical, automotive and aviation systems. Current methods usually assess confidence in assurance cases, but only with evidence available at design-time. However, real-world situations demand considerations of evidence that are also available at run-time. In this paper, we introduce a novel confidence measure called INCIDENCE (weIghted assuraNCe confIDENCE). The measure considers evidence available both at design and run times, and is suitable for the assessment of assurance cases represented using Goal Structuring Notation (GSN) – being a popular notation for representing assurance cases. We rely on the confidence measure to derive an uncertainty measure that can be used to measure technical debt (requirement debt) for software systems. We illustrate our work through an example focusing on feature identification.","PeriodicalId":166923,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Approach to Measure Confidence and Uncertainty in Assurance Cases\",\"authors\":\"Alvine Boaye Belle, T. Lethbridge, Sègla Kpodjedo, O. Adesina, Miguel Garzón\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/REW.2019.00011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assurance cases are a well-established structured technique used to document a reasoned, auditable argument supporting that a system meets desirable properties (e.g., safety or security). Assurance cases are increasingly becoming popular, and are being used to make safety and cyber-security arguments about medical, automotive and aviation systems. Current methods usually assess confidence in assurance cases, but only with evidence available at design-time. However, real-world situations demand considerations of evidence that are also available at run-time. In this paper, we introduce a novel confidence measure called INCIDENCE (weIghted assuraNCe confIDENCE). The measure considers evidence available both at design and run times, and is suitable for the assessment of assurance cases represented using Goal Structuring Notation (GSN) – being a popular notation for representing assurance cases. We rely on the confidence measure to derive an uncertainty measure that can be used to measure technical debt (requirement debt) for software systems. We illustrate our work through an example focusing on feature identification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/REW.2019.00011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 27th International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REW.2019.00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

保证用例是一种完善的结构化技术,用于记录一个合理的、可审计的论证,以支持系统满足所需的属性(例如,安全性或安全性)。保险案例越来越受欢迎,并被用于医疗、汽车和航空系统的安全和网络安全论证。目前的方法通常在保证案例中评估信心,但仅在设计时提供证据。然而,现实世界的情况需要考虑在运行时也可用的证据。本文引入了一种新的置信度度量——加权保证置信度。该度量考虑在设计和运行时可用的证据,并且适用于使用目标结构符号(GSN)表示的保证用例的评估——GSN是表示保证用例的流行符号。我们依靠置信度度量来导出一个不确定性度量,该不确定性度量可以用于度量软件系统的技术债务(需求债务)。我们通过一个专注于特征识别的示例来说明我们的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Novel Approach to Measure Confidence and Uncertainty in Assurance Cases
Assurance cases are a well-established structured technique used to document a reasoned, auditable argument supporting that a system meets desirable properties (e.g., safety or security). Assurance cases are increasingly becoming popular, and are being used to make safety and cyber-security arguments about medical, automotive and aviation systems. Current methods usually assess confidence in assurance cases, but only with evidence available at design-time. However, real-world situations demand considerations of evidence that are also available at run-time. In this paper, we introduce a novel confidence measure called INCIDENCE (weIghted assuraNCe confIDENCE). The measure considers evidence available both at design and run times, and is suitable for the assessment of assurance cases represented using Goal Structuring Notation (GSN) – being a popular notation for representing assurance cases. We rely on the confidence measure to derive an uncertainty measure that can be used to measure technical debt (requirement debt) for software systems. We illustrate our work through an example focusing on feature identification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CrowdRE: Achievements, Opportunities and Pitfalls When Interactive Graphic Storytelling Fails Process Mining for Cloud-Based Applications: A Systematic Literature Review Examination of Evaluation Method on Human Error During Work by Bioinstrumentation The Requirements Engineering Reference Model: A Fundamental Impediment to Using Formal Methods in Software Systems Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1