治疗选择的经济影响:肠促胰岛素的案例

R. Ravasio
{"title":"治疗选择的经济影响:肠促胰岛素的案例","authors":"R. Ravasio","doi":"10.5301/GRHTA.5000181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this economic evaluation was to compare two alternative therapeutic regimens for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: basal-bolus insulin vs basal insulin and DPP-4. We conducted a Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA) to compare the annual cost of basal-bolus insulin regimen vs basal insulin and DPP-4 regimen from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS). The CMA considered only direct medical costs (basal insulin, bolus insulin and DPP-4 [sitagliptin] and self-monitoring of glycemic control). Costs were assessed in 2014 Euros. Sensitivity analysis and threshold analysis on key economic parameters were performed. The expected annual cost (per patient) was €987.60 with basal insulin and DPP-4 and €1,568.23 with basal-bolus insulin. As a consequence of a significant reduction of glycemic control costs, the regimen with DPP-4 was a cost-saving alternative from the perspective of the Italian NHS.","PeriodicalId":228031,"journal":{"name":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":"295 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Impact of Therapeutic Choices: The Case of Incretins\",\"authors\":\"R. Ravasio\",\"doi\":\"10.5301/GRHTA.5000181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this economic evaluation was to compare two alternative therapeutic regimens for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: basal-bolus insulin vs basal insulin and DPP-4. We conducted a Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA) to compare the annual cost of basal-bolus insulin regimen vs basal insulin and DPP-4 regimen from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS). The CMA considered only direct medical costs (basal insulin, bolus insulin and DPP-4 [sitagliptin] and self-monitoring of glycemic control). Costs were assessed in 2014 Euros. Sensitivity analysis and threshold analysis on key economic parameters were performed. The expected annual cost (per patient) was €987.60 with basal insulin and DPP-4 and €1,568.23 with basal-bolus insulin. As a consequence of a significant reduction of glycemic control costs, the regimen with DPP-4 was a cost-saving alternative from the perspective of the Italian NHS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment\",\"volume\":\"295 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5301/GRHTA.5000181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/GRHTA.5000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项经济评估的目的是比较治疗2型糖尿病的两种替代治疗方案:基础胰岛素注射与基础胰岛素和DPP-4。我们进行了成本最小化分析(CMA),从意大利国家卫生服务(NHS)的角度比较基础胰岛素方案与基础胰岛素和DPP-4方案的年成本。CMA只考虑了直接医疗费用(基础胰岛素,胰岛素和DPP-4[西格列汀]和自我血糖控制监测)。费用以2014年欧元计算。对关键经济参数进行了敏感性分析和阈值分析。基础胰岛素和DPP-4组的预期年费用(每位患者)为987.60欧元,基础胰岛素组为1568.23欧元。由于血糖控制成本的显著降低,从意大利NHS的角度来看,DPP-4方案是一种节省成本的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Economic Impact of Therapeutic Choices: The Case of Incretins
The objective of this economic evaluation was to compare two alternative therapeutic regimens for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: basal-bolus insulin vs basal insulin and DPP-4. We conducted a Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA) to compare the annual cost of basal-bolus insulin regimen vs basal insulin and DPP-4 regimen from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS). The CMA considered only direct medical costs (basal insulin, bolus insulin and DPP-4 [sitagliptin] and self-monitoring of glycemic control). Costs were assessed in 2014 Euros. Sensitivity analysis and threshold analysis on key economic parameters were performed. The expected annual cost (per patient) was €987.60 with basal insulin and DPP-4 and €1,568.23 with basal-bolus insulin. As a consequence of a significant reduction of glycemic control costs, the regimen with DPP-4 was a cost-saving alternative from the perspective of the Italian NHS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The economic impact of 14 compassionate use programs for medicines in Italy, in the perspective of the National Health Service Heart failure and economic impact: an analysis in real clinical practice in Italy A pharmacoeconomic analysis from Italian guidelines for the management of prolactinomas New organizational and governance strategies in the management of epilepsy in Italy Personalized support programs with innovative digital tools to manage and monitor patients suffering from epilepsy: EpiOnApp case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1