民意调查的合理性与客观化分析

V. Finn, M. A. Mikheenkova
{"title":"民意调查的合理性与客观化分析","authors":"V. Finn, M. A. Mikheenkova","doi":"10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-401-414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ideological foundation of artificial intelligence as a scientific and applied field is an exact epistemology (EE), which is the study of the interaction of the cognizing subject and the corresponding object of cognition through heuristics and reasoning logics that generate new knowledge and its acceptance. Formal means of exact epistemology – languages of knowledge representation and logic of reasoning – and their practical implementation in computer systems provide constructive imitation and strengthening of some aspects of human intelligent activity. The formalization of cognitive activity is extremely in demand in the humanities, in particular, in the sciences of human and society. From the point of view of exact epistemology, a sociological poll – a traditional form of sociological research – is the interaction of the theoretical intelligence (one of the key concepts of EE) of the researcher and the respondents’ common sense. For a correct description of social reality, the question of the respondents’ rational perception of the elements of the questionnaire and the measure of rationality of individuals and their groups is not the last one. The scientific and constructively implemented apparatus of exact epistemology is the JSM-method of automated research support. The method has logical means for presenting opinions, as well as the formal presentation of a closed sociological poll. The instrumental capabilities of the JSM method provide a reasonable acceptance of new knowledge based on an expanded concept of rationality, including rationality as an argued opinion and argumentation, supported by formalized heuristics and the transformation of unclear ideas into precisely defined concepts.","PeriodicalId":124543,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\" Series","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF OPINIONS’ RATIONALITY AND OBJECTIFICATION OF THE POLL\",\"authors\":\"V. Finn, M. A. Mikheenkova\",\"doi\":\"10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-401-414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ideological foundation of artificial intelligence as a scientific and applied field is an exact epistemology (EE), which is the study of the interaction of the cognizing subject and the corresponding object of cognition through heuristics and reasoning logics that generate new knowledge and its acceptance. Formal means of exact epistemology – languages of knowledge representation and logic of reasoning – and their practical implementation in computer systems provide constructive imitation and strengthening of some aspects of human intelligent activity. The formalization of cognitive activity is extremely in demand in the humanities, in particular, in the sciences of human and society. From the point of view of exact epistemology, a sociological poll – a traditional form of sociological research – is the interaction of the theoretical intelligence (one of the key concepts of EE) of the researcher and the respondents’ common sense. For a correct description of social reality, the question of the respondents’ rational perception of the elements of the questionnaire and the measure of rationality of individuals and their groups is not the last one. The scientific and constructively implemented apparatus of exact epistemology is the JSM-method of automated research support. The method has logical means for presenting opinions, as well as the formal presentation of a closed sociological poll. The instrumental capabilities of the JSM method provide a reasonable acceptance of new knowledge based on an expanded concept of rationality, including rationality as an argued opinion and argumentation, supported by formalized heuristics and the transformation of unclear ideas into precisely defined concepts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \\\"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\\\" Series\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \\\"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\\\" Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-401-414\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\" Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-4-401-414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能作为一个科学和应用领域的思想基础是精确认识论(EE),它是通过启发式和推理逻辑来研究认知主体和相应的认知客体之间的相互作用,从而产生新的知识及其接受性。精确认识论的形式手段——知识表示语言和推理逻辑——以及它们在计算机系统中的实际实施,为人类智能活动的某些方面提供了建设性的模仿和加强。认知活动的形式化在人文学科,特别是人类和社会科学中是非常需要的。从精确认识论的观点来看,社会学民意调查作为一种传统的社会学研究形式,是研究者的理论智力(情感表达的关键概念之一)与被调查者的常识相互作用的结果。为了正确地描述社会现实,被访者对问卷要素的理性感知和对个人及其群体理性的衡量并不是最后一个问题。精确认识论的科学和建设性实施的工具是自动化研究支持的jsm方法。该方法具有表达意见的逻辑手段,以及封闭的社会学民意调查的正式呈现。JSM方法的工具功能提供了对新知识的合理接受,这是基于理性的扩展概念,包括理性作为一种有争议的意见和论证,由形式化的启发式和将不明确的想法转化为精确定义的概念来支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALYSIS OF OPINIONS’ RATIONALITY AND OBJECTIFICATION OF THE POLL
The ideological foundation of artificial intelligence as a scientific and applied field is an exact epistemology (EE), which is the study of the interaction of the cognizing subject and the corresponding object of cognition through heuristics and reasoning logics that generate new knowledge and its acceptance. Formal means of exact epistemology – languages of knowledge representation and logic of reasoning – and their practical implementation in computer systems provide constructive imitation and strengthening of some aspects of human intelligent activity. The formalization of cognitive activity is extremely in demand in the humanities, in particular, in the sciences of human and society. From the point of view of exact epistemology, a sociological poll – a traditional form of sociological research – is the interaction of the theoretical intelligence (one of the key concepts of EE) of the researcher and the respondents’ common sense. For a correct description of social reality, the question of the respondents’ rational perception of the elements of the questionnaire and the measure of rationality of individuals and their groups is not the last one. The scientific and constructively implemented apparatus of exact epistemology is the JSM-method of automated research support. The method has logical means for presenting opinions, as well as the formal presentation of a closed sociological poll. The instrumental capabilities of the JSM method provide a reasonable acceptance of new knowledge based on an expanded concept of rationality, including rationality as an argued opinion and argumentation, supported by formalized heuristics and the transformation of unclear ideas into precisely defined concepts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ORIENTALISM IN THE WORK OF V.I. DAHL STYLISTIC ADEQUACY OF TRANSLATION WHEN TRANSFERRING TAJIK FIGURES OF CONTRAST INTO RUSSIAN THE MIRCOWORLD OF THE LOGICAL AND MODAL PARTICLES. OUTLINES TO LINGUISTIC “PORTRAIT” OF DAZHE THE FORMATION OF THE IMAGE OF THE VICTORIAN NOVEL IN THE “VESTNIK EVROPY” (1870S) THE PROBLEM-AXIOLOGICAL APPROACH TO TEACHING OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE FOR STUDENTS’ NON-NATIVE SPEECH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1