政治腐败和公务员问责制

Rodolfo Vázquez
{"title":"政治腐败和公务员问责制","authors":"Rodolfo Vázquez","doi":"10.14198/DOXA2007.30.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay answers the question about the nature and the concept of corruption and tries to justify the ethical and juridical framework from which it is possible to conceive the different institutional barriers necessary to restrain it: the democratic State, the Rule of Law and, specifically, the accountability of the public officers. Regarding the latter, this essay analyses some principles such as public access to information and official publicity or transparency.","PeriodicalId":393808,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Program in Law & Economics","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corrupción política y responsabilidad de los servidores públicos\",\"authors\":\"Rodolfo Vázquez\",\"doi\":\"10.14198/DOXA2007.30.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay answers the question about the nature and the concept of corruption and tries to justify the ethical and juridical framework from which it is possible to conceive the different institutional barriers necessary to restrain it: the democratic State, the Rule of Law and, specifically, the accountability of the public officers. Regarding the latter, this essay analyses some principles such as public access to information and official publicity or transparency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Program in Law & Economics\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Program in Law & Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA2007.30.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Program in Law & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/DOXA2007.30.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

这篇文章回答了关于腐败的性质和概念的问题,并试图证明道德和法律框架的合理性,由此可以设想限制腐败所必需的不同体制障碍:民主国家、法治,特别是公职人员的问责制。对于后者,本文分析了信息公开和官方公开或透明等原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corrupción política y responsabilidad de los servidores públicos
This essay answers the question about the nature and the concept of corruption and tries to justify the ethical and juridical framework from which it is possible to conceive the different institutional barriers necessary to restrain it: the democratic State, the Rule of Law and, specifically, the accountability of the public officers. Regarding the latter, this essay analyses some principles such as public access to information and official publicity or transparency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Default Rules and the Inevitability of Paternalism The Unseen Elephant: What Blocks Judicial System Improvement? Economia Política da Disputa por Terras em Minas Gerais THE BIT GENERATION’S EMERGENCE AS A COLLECTIVE ACTION PROBLEM: Prisoner's dilemma or network effects? Robin Hood Vs. King John Redistribution: How Do Local Judges Decide Cases in Brazil?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1