理解生态焦虑:临床和现象学方法

Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.psfr.2022.03.003
H. Jalin, C. Chandes, A. Congard, A.-H. Boudoukha
{"title":"理解生态焦虑:临床和现象学方法","authors":"H. Jalin,&nbsp;C. Chandes,&nbsp;A. Congard,&nbsp;A.-H. Boudoukha","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2022.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Climate change is one of the most important threats of the 21st century because of its social, economic and health consequences. From a psychological point of view, it is also a source of anxiety. The concept of eco-anxiety as it's known, is relatively recent and requires some clarification. In order to explore this phenomenon, a qualitative study was conducted with 18 participants aged between 19 and 48 years old. They participated in individual semi-directive interviews or focus groups, that were subject to a thematic content analysis. These analyses made it possible to highlight a construct comprised of a variety of symptoms that can be divided into six dimensions. Three dimensions that were already mentioned in the literature were highlighted: negative moods and cognitions related to the anticipation of the effects of climate change, anxiety and somatic manifestations. In addition, three new dimensions emerged from the interviews: questioning one's life choices, an intense stress experienced at the mention of the climate crisis and an evaluation of relationships with others towards isolation and more selective relationships. The psychopathological consequences of ecoanxiety, characterized by an exacerbation of some of the symptomatic dimensions identified in this research, could manifest itself especially in individuals who do not have sufficient resources to implement effective stress coping strategies. Therefore, treatment should focus on stress management (promote using different coping strategies), cognitive-emotion regulation (identifying dysfunctional thoughts and supporting values).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appréhender l’éco-anxiété : une approche clinique et phénoménologique\",\"authors\":\"H. Jalin,&nbsp;C. Chandes,&nbsp;A. Congard,&nbsp;A.-H. Boudoukha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psfr.2022.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Climate change is one of the most important threats of the 21st century because of its social, economic and health consequences. From a psychological point of view, it is also a source of anxiety. The concept of eco-anxiety as it's known, is relatively recent and requires some clarification. In order to explore this phenomenon, a qualitative study was conducted with 18 participants aged between 19 and 48 years old. They participated in individual semi-directive interviews or focus groups, that were subject to a thematic content analysis. These analyses made it possible to highlight a construct comprised of a variety of symptoms that can be divided into six dimensions. Three dimensions that were already mentioned in the literature were highlighted: negative moods and cognitions related to the anticipation of the effects of climate change, anxiety and somatic manifestations. In addition, three new dimensions emerged from the interviews: questioning one's life choices, an intense stress experienced at the mention of the climate crisis and an evaluation of relationships with others towards isolation and more selective relationships. The psychopathological consequences of ecoanxiety, characterized by an exacerbation of some of the symptomatic dimensions identified in this research, could manifest itself especially in individuals who do not have sufficient resources to implement effective stress coping strategies. Therefore, treatment should focus on stress management (promote using different coping strategies), cognitive-emotion regulation (identifying dysfunctional thoughts and supporting values).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298422000255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298422000255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气候变化因其社会、经济和健康后果而成为 21 世纪最重要的威胁之一。从心理学角度来看,气候变化也是焦虑的根源。生态焦虑这一概念相对较新,需要进一步澄清。为了探讨这一现象,我们对 18 名年龄在 19 至 48 岁之间的参与者进行了定性研究。他们参加了个人半定向访谈或焦点小组,并接受了主题内容分析。这些分析突出了一个由各种症状组成的结构,可分为六个方面。文献中已经提到的三个方面得到了强调:与预期气候变化影响有关的消极情绪和认知、焦虑和躯体表现。此外,访谈中还出现了三个新的方面:质疑自己的人生选择、一提到气候危机就感到强烈的压力、评估与他人的关系时倾向于孤立和更具选择性的关系。生态焦虑的精神病理学后果,以本研究中发现的某些症状的加重为特征,特别是在没有足够资源实施有效的压力应对策略的人身上可能会表现出来。因此,治疗重点应放在压力管理(促进使用不同的应对策略)、认知-情绪调节(识别功能失调的想法和支持价值观)上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Appréhender l’éco-anxiété : une approche clinique et phénoménologique

Climate change is one of the most important threats of the 21st century because of its social, economic and health consequences. From a psychological point of view, it is also a source of anxiety. The concept of eco-anxiety as it's known, is relatively recent and requires some clarification. In order to explore this phenomenon, a qualitative study was conducted with 18 participants aged between 19 and 48 years old. They participated in individual semi-directive interviews or focus groups, that were subject to a thematic content analysis. These analyses made it possible to highlight a construct comprised of a variety of symptoms that can be divided into six dimensions. Three dimensions that were already mentioned in the literature were highlighted: negative moods and cognitions related to the anticipation of the effects of climate change, anxiety and somatic manifestations. In addition, three new dimensions emerged from the interviews: questioning one's life choices, an intense stress experienced at the mention of the climate crisis and an evaluation of relationships with others towards isolation and more selective relationships. The psychopathological consequences of ecoanxiety, characterized by an exacerbation of some of the symptomatic dimensions identified in this research, could manifest itself especially in individuals who do not have sufficient resources to implement effective stress coping strategies. Therefore, treatment should focus on stress management (promote using different coping strategies), cognitive-emotion regulation (identifying dysfunctional thoughts and supporting values).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1