对智力干预下层声音的再思考

Dian Windriani, Dyanti Mahrunnisya
{"title":"对智力干预下层声音的再思考","authors":"Dian Windriani, Dyanti Mahrunnisya","doi":"10.52217/jeta.v2i2.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postcolonial theory on subaltern is presented in order to examine the subaltern’s voice in which its status is still debatable, whether they can voice for themselves or not. According to Spivak, subaltern does not have their own voice. She then proposes the idea of letting the intellectual intervention in voicing subaltern’s voice. However, her proposal is opposed by some theorist; one of them is Homi Baba. He believes that there is no need to borrow intellectual voice because the subaltern voicing themselves, due to the ambivalence of the colonizer’s power. This paper will examine how the debate related to the intellectual intervention in voicing the subaltern voice by contextualizing in the case of Sati and Bhuvaneswari.","PeriodicalId":175332,"journal":{"name":"JETA (Journal of English Teaching and Applied Linguistic)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RETHINKING OF INTELLECTUAL INTERVENTION ON THE SUBALTERN VOICE\",\"authors\":\"Dian Windriani, Dyanti Mahrunnisya\",\"doi\":\"10.52217/jeta.v2i2.272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Postcolonial theory on subaltern is presented in order to examine the subaltern’s voice in which its status is still debatable, whether they can voice for themselves or not. According to Spivak, subaltern does not have their own voice. She then proposes the idea of letting the intellectual intervention in voicing subaltern’s voice. However, her proposal is opposed by some theorist; one of them is Homi Baba. He believes that there is no need to borrow intellectual voice because the subaltern voicing themselves, due to the ambivalence of the colonizer’s power. This paper will examine how the debate related to the intellectual intervention in voicing the subaltern voice by contextualizing in the case of Sati and Bhuvaneswari.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JETA (Journal of English Teaching and Applied Linguistic)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JETA (Journal of English Teaching and Applied Linguistic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52217/jeta.v2i2.272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JETA (Journal of English Teaching and Applied Linguistic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52217/jeta.v2i2.272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

后殖民理论的提出是为了检查次等人的声音,其地位仍然是有争议的,他们是否可以为自己发声。斯皮瓦克认为,次等人没有自己的发言权。然后她提出了让智力干预来为次等人发声的想法。然而,她的建议遭到了一些理论家的反对;其中一个是霍米巴巴。他认为,没有必要借用知识分子的声音,因为次等人在表达自己,因为殖民者的权力是矛盾的。本文将以萨提和布瓦内斯瓦里的案例为背景,研究辩论是如何与表达下层声音的智力干预相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RETHINKING OF INTELLECTUAL INTERVENTION ON THE SUBALTERN VOICE
Postcolonial theory on subaltern is presented in order to examine the subaltern’s voice in which its status is still debatable, whether they can voice for themselves or not. According to Spivak, subaltern does not have their own voice. She then proposes the idea of letting the intellectual intervention in voicing subaltern’s voice. However, her proposal is opposed by some theorist; one of them is Homi Baba. He believes that there is no need to borrow intellectual voice because the subaltern voicing themselves, due to the ambivalence of the colonizer’s power. This paper will examine how the debate related to the intellectual intervention in voicing the subaltern voice by contextualizing in the case of Sati and Bhuvaneswari.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WORD GROUPING ACTIVITY TO IMPROVE STUDENTS' VOCABULARY MASTERY: A CLASSROOM ACTION RESEARCH WORD WALL TECHNIQUE: A SOLUTION FOR TEACHING ENGLISH VOCABULARY THE USE OF ABBREVIATIONS IN DIPLOMATIC TEXTS IN ENGLISH AND TAJIK LANGUAGES PECULIARITIES OF TRANSLATION POETRY TEXTS IN ENGLISH REVIEWING NURISTANI LANGUAGES AND TRIBAL DIALECTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1