{"title":"液压机活塞杆的疲劳失效","authors":"","doi":"10.31399/asm.fach.machtools.c9001413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The fractured end of a piston rod of a hydraulic press failed in line with the leading face of the piston retaining nut. Although the nut apparently had been seated uniformly, the face was polished, indicating that relative movement between it and the piston had taken place. Failure resulted from the culmination of two principal fatigue cracks which developed on approximately parallel planes from the roots of adjacent threads. A longitudinal section through the screw thread on the piston rod showed it had been carburized but not hardened, and that subsequent surface de-carburization to a depth of approximately 0.001 in. had occurred. It was concluded that insufficient tightening, as evidenced by the polish markings, was the main reason for failure, the portion of the rod therefore being subjected to a greater variation of cyclic stress during operation. The presence of the de-carburized layer lowered its resistance to the initiation of a fatigue crack to that of iron, considerably less than the resistance of the mild steel from which the rod was made and well below that shown by the carburized layer.","PeriodicalId":446028,"journal":{"name":"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Machine Tools and Manufacturing Equipment","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fatigue Failure of Piston Rod from Hydraulic Press\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.31399/asm.fach.machtools.c9001413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The fractured end of a piston rod of a hydraulic press failed in line with the leading face of the piston retaining nut. Although the nut apparently had been seated uniformly, the face was polished, indicating that relative movement between it and the piston had taken place. Failure resulted from the culmination of two principal fatigue cracks which developed on approximately parallel planes from the roots of adjacent threads. A longitudinal section through the screw thread on the piston rod showed it had been carburized but not hardened, and that subsequent surface de-carburization to a depth of approximately 0.001 in. had occurred. It was concluded that insufficient tightening, as evidenced by the polish markings, was the main reason for failure, the portion of the rod therefore being subjected to a greater variation of cyclic stress during operation. The presence of the de-carburized layer lowered its resistance to the initiation of a fatigue crack to that of iron, considerably less than the resistance of the mild steel from which the rod was made and well below that shown by the carburized layer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Machine Tools and Manufacturing Equipment\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Machine Tools and Manufacturing Equipment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.fach.machtools.c9001413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASM Failure Analysis Case Histories: Machine Tools and Manufacturing Equipment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.fach.machtools.c9001413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

液压机活塞杆断裂的一端与活塞固定螺母的导面不一致。虽然螺母显然是均匀地安装在位置上的,但表面却被抛光了,这表明它和活塞之间发生了相对运动。破坏是由两个主疲劳裂纹的顶点造成的,这两个主疲劳裂纹从相邻螺纹的根部开始在近似平行的平面上发展。活塞杆螺纹的纵剖面显示,活塞杆已经渗碳,但没有硬化,随后的表面脱碳深度约为0.001英寸。发生。结论是,如抛光标记所证明的那样,拧紧不足是失败的主要原因,因此在操作过程中,杆的部分受到更大的循环应力变化。脱碳层的存在使其抗疲劳裂纹萌生的能力降低到铁的水平,大大低于制造棒材的低碳钢的抗疲劳裂纹萌生能力,而且远低于渗碳层所显示的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fatigue Failure of Piston Rod from Hydraulic Press
The fractured end of a piston rod of a hydraulic press failed in line with the leading face of the piston retaining nut. Although the nut apparently had been seated uniformly, the face was polished, indicating that relative movement between it and the piston had taken place. Failure resulted from the culmination of two principal fatigue cracks which developed on approximately parallel planes from the roots of adjacent threads. A longitudinal section through the screw thread on the piston rod showed it had been carburized but not hardened, and that subsequent surface de-carburization to a depth of approximately 0.001 in. had occurred. It was concluded that insufficient tightening, as evidenced by the polish markings, was the main reason for failure, the portion of the rod therefore being subjected to a greater variation of cyclic stress during operation. The presence of the de-carburized layer lowered its resistance to the initiation of a fatigue crack to that of iron, considerably less than the resistance of the mild steel from which the rod was made and well below that shown by the carburized layer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hydrogen Embrittlement of a Draw-in Bolt Rapid Wear of an Impact Breaker Bar Due to Excessive Retained Austenite Fatigue Fracture of a Rolling-Tool Mandrel Initiated at Cracks Formed by Machining of a Hole A Broken Cross-Recessed Die Made from High Speed Tool Steel Fatigue Failure of Piston Rod from Hydraulic Press
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1