欧洲基金在葡萄牙的评估

A. Amandio
{"title":"欧洲基金在葡萄牙的评估","authors":"A. Amandio","doi":"10.33167/2184-0644.cpp2022.8.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a study on the evaluation of the main Cohesion Policy instrument in European Portugal, the European Structural Investment Funds (ESIF). The institutionalisation of the evaluation of European funds in public administration is analysed from a documentary base composed of national and EU legislation (1986-2020), focusing on the actors and the evaluation rules. The production of these empirical data reveals a dual process of implementation of the evaluation policy of European funds in the indirect administration of the state, where increasing technocratisation of the evaluation represents new constraints to funding.","PeriodicalId":134845,"journal":{"name":"Ciências e Políticas Públicas / Public Sciences & Policies","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Avaliação dos Fundos Europeus em Portugal\",\"authors\":\"A. Amandio\",\"doi\":\"10.33167/2184-0644.cpp2022.8.1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents a study on the evaluation of the main Cohesion Policy instrument in European Portugal, the European Structural Investment Funds (ESIF). The institutionalisation of the evaluation of European funds in public administration is analysed from a documentary base composed of national and EU legislation (1986-2020), focusing on the actors and the evaluation rules. The production of these empirical data reveals a dual process of implementation of the evaluation policy of European funds in the indirect administration of the state, where increasing technocratisation of the evaluation represents new constraints to funding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciências e Políticas Públicas / Public Sciences & Policies\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciências e Políticas Públicas / Public Sciences & Policies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-0644.cpp2022.8.1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciências e Políticas Públicas / Public Sciences & Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-0644.cpp2022.8.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对欧洲葡萄牙的主要凝聚力政策工具——欧洲结构投资基金(ESIF)的评估进行了研究。从国家和欧盟立法(1986-2020)组成的文献基础上分析了公共行政中欧洲资金评估的制度化,重点关注行为者和评估规则。这些经验数据的产生揭示了在国家间接管理中实施欧洲基金评估政策的双重过程,其中评估的日益技术化代表了对资金的新限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Avaliação dos Fundos Europeus em Portugal
This article presents a study on the evaluation of the main Cohesion Policy instrument in European Portugal, the European Structural Investment Funds (ESIF). The institutionalisation of the evaluation of European funds in public administration is analysed from a documentary base composed of national and EU legislation (1986-2020), focusing on the actors and the evaluation rules. The production of these empirical data reveals a dual process of implementation of the evaluation policy of European funds in the indirect administration of the state, where increasing technocratisation of the evaluation represents new constraints to funding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public Arena on the internet in defense of the public university in Brazil: Strategies of #UERJResiste The protagonism of local populations in the Mariana and Brumadinho crises in the national and regional press Communicating climate change and energy in rural Africa: A case analysis to explain how participatory communication can support transition to renewables and adoption of solar technologies in rural Africa Arena pública na internet em defesa da universidade pública no Brasil: Estratégias de #UERJResiste O protagonismo das populações locais nas crises de Mariana e Brumadinho na imprensa nacional e regional
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1