市场边界的计量经济模型

Arman A. Shakkaliyev
{"title":"市场边界的计量经济模型","authors":"Arman A. Shakkaliyev","doi":"10.37791/2687-0657-2022-16-4-133-143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the study is due to the special importance of correctly determining the product boundaries of the cross-border markets of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in the process of antimonopoly regulation. An erroneous definition of such parameters leads to an incorrect definition of the product, and, as a result, to a narrowing or expansion of the scope and geography of its circulation, an increase or blurring of the shares of entities operating in the markets, a false level of concentration, as well as a distortion of the criteria for delineating the competence of the EEC and national authorities in terms of abuse of dominance. This process can be much more complicated when it comes to goods that are subject to technical regulations, and due to their specificity, there are a significant number of types of goods that are generally similar in some respects, but differ in others. In this regard, within the framework of the study, an attempt was made to assess the possibilities of using certain methods of econometric modeling when establishing product boundaries for cross-border markets for such goods using the example of non-electric initiation systems. The research hypothesis is based on the following assumptions. First: technical regulations and standards not only act as market entry barriers, but also have a decisive influence on the definition of a market within which goods equivalent to each other circulate. Second: when determining the product boundaries of markets operating in the system of technical regulation, along with traditional and normatively fixed approaches, multiple regression models can be used and a correlation between the cost of a product and its characteristics, as well as empirical analysis data that allows segmenting goods according to specific boundaries, can be used.","PeriodicalId":269031,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Competition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Econometric Modeling of the Markets Boundaries\",\"authors\":\"Arman A. Shakkaliyev\",\"doi\":\"10.37791/2687-0657-2022-16-4-133-143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relevance of the study is due to the special importance of correctly determining the product boundaries of the cross-border markets of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in the process of antimonopoly regulation. An erroneous definition of such parameters leads to an incorrect definition of the product, and, as a result, to a narrowing or expansion of the scope and geography of its circulation, an increase or blurring of the shares of entities operating in the markets, a false level of concentration, as well as a distortion of the criteria for delineating the competence of the EEC and national authorities in terms of abuse of dominance. This process can be much more complicated when it comes to goods that are subject to technical regulations, and due to their specificity, there are a significant number of types of goods that are generally similar in some respects, but differ in others. In this regard, within the framework of the study, an attempt was made to assess the possibilities of using certain methods of econometric modeling when establishing product boundaries for cross-border markets for such goods using the example of non-electric initiation systems. The research hypothesis is based on the following assumptions. First: technical regulations and standards not only act as market entry barriers, but also have a decisive influence on the definition of a market within which goods equivalent to each other circulate. Second: when determining the product boundaries of markets operating in the system of technical regulation, along with traditional and normatively fixed approaches, multiple regression models can be used and a correlation between the cost of a product and its characteristics, as well as empirical analysis data that allows segmenting goods according to specific boundaries, can be used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Competition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Competition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0657-2022-16-4-133-143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Competition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37791/2687-0657-2022-16-4-133-143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究的相关性是由于在反垄断监管过程中正确确定欧亚经济联盟(EAEU)跨境市场的产品边界的特殊重要性。对这些参数的错误定义会导致对产品的不正确定义,并导致其流通范围和地理范围的缩小或扩大,市场中经营实体份额的增加或模糊,集中度的错误水平,以及在滥用主导地位方面描述欧共体和国家当局权限的标准的扭曲。当涉及到受技术法规约束的商品时,这个过程可能会复杂得多,并且由于它们的特殊性,有大量类型的商品在某些方面通常相似,但在其他方面有所不同。在这方面,在研究的框架内,以非电力启动系统为例,试图评估在为这类货物的跨界市场建立产品边界时使用某些计量经济模型方法的可能性。研究假设是基于以下假设。首先,技术法规和标准不仅是市场进入壁垒,而且对相互等效商品流通的市场的定义具有决定性影响。其次,在确定技术法规体系中运行的市场的产品边界时,除了传统的和规范固定的方法外,还可以使用多元回归模型和产品成本与其特征之间的相关性,以及可以根据特定边界对商品进行细分的经验分析数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Econometric Modeling of the Markets Boundaries
The relevance of the study is due to the special importance of correctly determining the product boundaries of the cross-border markets of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in the process of antimonopoly regulation. An erroneous definition of such parameters leads to an incorrect definition of the product, and, as a result, to a narrowing or expansion of the scope and geography of its circulation, an increase or blurring of the shares of entities operating in the markets, a false level of concentration, as well as a distortion of the criteria for delineating the competence of the EEC and national authorities in terms of abuse of dominance. This process can be much more complicated when it comes to goods that are subject to technical regulations, and due to their specificity, there are a significant number of types of goods that are generally similar in some respects, but differ in others. In this regard, within the framework of the study, an attempt was made to assess the possibilities of using certain methods of econometric modeling when establishing product boundaries for cross-border markets for such goods using the example of non-electric initiation systems. The research hypothesis is based on the following assumptions. First: technical regulations and standards not only act as market entry barriers, but also have a decisive influence on the definition of a market within which goods equivalent to each other circulate. Second: when determining the product boundaries of markets operating in the system of technical regulation, along with traditional and normatively fixed approaches, multiple regression models can be used and a correlation between the cost of a product and its characteristics, as well as empirical analysis data that allows segmenting goods according to specific boundaries, can be used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of VR Technologies in the Competitive Environment of the Restaurant Business Role of Organizational and Managerial Innovations in the Development of the Russian Electronics Industry Application of Innovative Approaches in Сrisis Management of Internet Platforms Business Game as a Method of Developing Entrepreneurial Skills of Competition Blind Spots in the Procedure for Analyzing the State of Competition in the Commodity Market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1