两类聚乙烯醇硅氧烷压模材料之间多次浇注的可靠性:初步立体显微镜研究

M. Sayed, Bandar Abdullah AL-Makramani, Fuad A. Al-Sanabani, F. Shaabi
{"title":"两类聚乙烯醇硅氧烷压模材料之间多次浇注的可靠性:初步立体显微镜研究","authors":"M. Sayed, Bandar Abdullah AL-Makramani, Fuad A. Al-Sanabani, F. Shaabi","doi":"10.4103/kkujhs.kkujhs_16_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and dimensional stability of casts made from regular set alginate alternative (AA) and monophase additional silicone (MAS) impression materials following multiple pours. Materials and Methods: A hard typodont master cast with index holes was used. A total of 20 impressions were made using a modified perforated metal tray with 10 impressions of each material. Each impression was poured four times with type IV die stone with a total of 80 stone casts (40 for each material). The horizontal anterior–posterior (HAP), horizontal cross-arch (HCA), and vertical distances were measured in the recovered stone casts using a stereomicroscope with an accuracy of 0.001 mm. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD post hoc test (P < 0.05). Results: The dimensions on the typodont master cast and stone casts were significantly different (P < 0.001), except for the first pour from MAS (P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the dimensions of the stone casts made from the AA and MAS impression materials among the four pour groups (P < 0.001), with exception of MAS-based casts between first pour and second pour groups at HAP and HCA dimensions. Pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant difference between the two impression materials at all measurement locations, with only one exception of HAP measurements for second-poured casts. Conclusion: A clinically acceptable casts can be made by pouring AA and MAS impressions twice. In addition, the third and fourth pours were accurate in the AA group when compared to MAS group. Clinical Significance: According the knowledge of the authors, this study is the first to evaluate the predictability of re-pouring alginate alternative impression material and compare to a standard polyvinyl siloxane impression material such as monophase. Therefore, the statement of clinical significance in the abstract will help the dentists to realize the potential uses for alginate alternative impression material and recommendations of this study.","PeriodicalId":344305,"journal":{"name":"King Khalid University Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of multiple pour between two classes of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: A preliminary stereomicroscopic study\",\"authors\":\"M. Sayed, Bandar Abdullah AL-Makramani, Fuad A. Al-Sanabani, F. Shaabi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/kkujhs.kkujhs_16_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and dimensional stability of casts made from regular set alginate alternative (AA) and monophase additional silicone (MAS) impression materials following multiple pours. Materials and Methods: A hard typodont master cast with index holes was used. A total of 20 impressions were made using a modified perforated metal tray with 10 impressions of each material. Each impression was poured four times with type IV die stone with a total of 80 stone casts (40 for each material). The horizontal anterior–posterior (HAP), horizontal cross-arch (HCA), and vertical distances were measured in the recovered stone casts using a stereomicroscope with an accuracy of 0.001 mm. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD post hoc test (P < 0.05). Results: The dimensions on the typodont master cast and stone casts were significantly different (P < 0.001), except for the first pour from MAS (P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the dimensions of the stone casts made from the AA and MAS impression materials among the four pour groups (P < 0.001), with exception of MAS-based casts between first pour and second pour groups at HAP and HCA dimensions. Pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant difference between the two impression materials at all measurement locations, with only one exception of HAP measurements for second-poured casts. Conclusion: A clinically acceptable casts can be made by pouring AA and MAS impressions twice. In addition, the third and fourth pours were accurate in the AA group when compared to MAS group. Clinical Significance: According the knowledge of the authors, this study is the first to evaluate the predictability of re-pouring alginate alternative impression material and compare to a standard polyvinyl siloxane impression material such as monophase. Therefore, the statement of clinical significance in the abstract will help the dentists to realize the potential uses for alginate alternative impression material and recommendations of this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King Khalid University Journal of Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King Khalid University Journal of Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/kkujhs.kkujhs_16_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King Khalid University Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/kkujhs.kkujhs_16_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价常规海藻酸盐替代(AA)和单相附加硅酮(MAS)压模材料多次倒模后的铸型精度和尺寸稳定性。材料与方法:采用带索引孔的硬铅字母铸模。使用改良的穿孔金属托盘,每种材料有10个印痕,共20个印痕。每个模版用IV型模石浇筑四次,共80个石模(每种材料40个)。使用立体显微镜测量恢复的石模的水平前后(HAP)、水平交叉弓(HCA)和垂直距离,精度为0.001 mm。采用双向方差分析和Tukey’s HSD事后检验对所得数据进行统计学分析(P < 0.05)。结果:除MAS第一次浇铸外,主浇铸件的尺寸与石浇铸件的尺寸差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。除了第一次浇筑组和第二次浇筑组在HAP和HCA尺寸上的基于MAS的浇筑体外,四种浇筑组的AA和MAS压模材料的浇筑体尺寸在统计学上有显著差异(P < 0.001)。两两比较显示,在所有测量位置,两种压模材料之间存在统计学上的显著差异,只有二次浇铸的HAP测量例外。结论:AA、MAS压模两次可制成临床可接受的铸型。此外,与MAS组相比,AA组的第三和第四次灌注更准确。临床意义:据作者所知,本研究首次评估了再灌注海藻酸盐替代印模材料的可预测性,并与标准聚氯乙烯硅氧烷印模材料(如单相)进行了比较。因此,摘要中临床意义的陈述将有助于牙医认识到海藻酸盐替代印模材料的潜在用途和本研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of multiple pour between two classes of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: A preliminary stereomicroscopic study
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and dimensional stability of casts made from regular set alginate alternative (AA) and monophase additional silicone (MAS) impression materials following multiple pours. Materials and Methods: A hard typodont master cast with index holes was used. A total of 20 impressions were made using a modified perforated metal tray with 10 impressions of each material. Each impression was poured four times with type IV die stone with a total of 80 stone casts (40 for each material). The horizontal anterior–posterior (HAP), horizontal cross-arch (HCA), and vertical distances were measured in the recovered stone casts using a stereomicroscope with an accuracy of 0.001 mm. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD post hoc test (P < 0.05). Results: The dimensions on the typodont master cast and stone casts were significantly different (P < 0.001), except for the first pour from MAS (P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the dimensions of the stone casts made from the AA and MAS impression materials among the four pour groups (P < 0.001), with exception of MAS-based casts between first pour and second pour groups at HAP and HCA dimensions. Pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant difference between the two impression materials at all measurement locations, with only one exception of HAP measurements for second-poured casts. Conclusion: A clinically acceptable casts can be made by pouring AA and MAS impressions twice. In addition, the third and fourth pours were accurate in the AA group when compared to MAS group. Clinical Significance: According the knowledge of the authors, this study is the first to evaluate the predictability of re-pouring alginate alternative impression material and compare to a standard polyvinyl siloxane impression material such as monophase. Therefore, the statement of clinical significance in the abstract will help the dentists to realize the potential uses for alginate alternative impression material and recommendations of this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Career development counseling: Trends and perception among health science students at King Khalid University Genes linked with orthodontic issues and the knowledge gaps in this association Factors associated with the gaps in the knowledge of diabetic patients attending primary health care center in Aseer region, KSA Burden and risk factors associated with bronchial asthma among secondary school children in Abha City, Saudi Arabia Incidence of root canal treatment after orthognathic surgery cases: A retrospective 5-year follow-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1