正常第一产程的自然史

K. Fox
{"title":"正常第一产程的自然史","authors":"K. Fox","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780190947088.003.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a summary of a landmark study on labor, in a large, multicenter modern cohort of women with singleton, vertex gestations. Emanuel Friedman published his original labor curve showing the expected progression of normal labor in 1955, and that for multiparous patients in 1956.2,3 He plotted the individual labor progression of 500 nulliparous laboring women from a single center to calculate the average progression of labor. In his cohort, 70% of whom were between 20 and 30 years old, many were Caucasian, and 55% of women were delivered via forceps. Dr. Friedman classically identified the second stage of labor starting at 4cm dilatation. Since the mid-20th century, many practice patterns have changed, and today’s population of women delivering in the United States is diverse and, on average, older and heavier than in 1955; therefore, use of the traditional labor curve has been questioned. The investigators in this study performed a secondary analysis of data from a multicenter cohort of 26,838 patients with singleton gestation, spontaneous labor, and normal outcomes. Using a sophisticated statistical approach Zhang et al. produced a modern labor curve.","PeriodicalId":114053,"journal":{"name":"50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Natural History of the Normal First Stage of Labor\",\"authors\":\"K. Fox\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/MED/9780190947088.003.0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides a summary of a landmark study on labor, in a large, multicenter modern cohort of women with singleton, vertex gestations. Emanuel Friedman published his original labor curve showing the expected progression of normal labor in 1955, and that for multiparous patients in 1956.2,3 He plotted the individual labor progression of 500 nulliparous laboring women from a single center to calculate the average progression of labor. In his cohort, 70% of whom were between 20 and 30 years old, many were Caucasian, and 55% of women were delivered via forceps. Dr. Friedman classically identified the second stage of labor starting at 4cm dilatation. Since the mid-20th century, many practice patterns have changed, and today’s population of women delivering in the United States is diverse and, on average, older and heavier than in 1955; therefore, use of the traditional labor curve has been questioned. The investigators in this study performed a secondary analysis of data from a multicenter cohort of 26,838 patients with singleton gestation, spontaneous labor, and normal outcomes. Using a sophisticated statistical approach Zhang et al. produced a modern labor curve.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780190947088.003.0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"50 Studies Every Obstetrician-Gynecologist Should Know","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780190947088.003.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章提供了一项具有里程碑意义的劳动研究的总结,在一个大的,多中心的现代队列妇女单胎,顶点妊娠。伊曼纽尔·弗里德曼(Emanuel Friedman)在1955年发表了他的原始劳动曲线,显示了正常劳动的预期进程,并在1956年发表了多胎患者的劳动曲线6.2,3他从一个中心绘制了500名未分娩妇女的个人劳动进程,以计算平均劳动进程。在他的队列中,70%的人年龄在20到30岁之间,许多是白种人,55%的妇女是通过产钳分娩的。弗里德曼医生经典地确定了产程的第二阶段,从扩张4厘米开始。自20世纪中期以来,许多实践模式发生了变化,今天在美国分娩的妇女人口多样化,平均年龄和体重都比1955年大;因此,传统劳动曲线的使用受到了质疑。本研究的研究人员对26,838例单胎妊娠、自然分娩和正常结局患者的多中心队列数据进行了二次分析。Zhang等人使用复杂的统计方法绘制了一条现代劳动曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Natural History of the Normal First Stage of Labor
This article provides a summary of a landmark study on labor, in a large, multicenter modern cohort of women with singleton, vertex gestations. Emanuel Friedman published his original labor curve showing the expected progression of normal labor in 1955, and that for multiparous patients in 1956.2,3 He plotted the individual labor progression of 500 nulliparous laboring women from a single center to calculate the average progression of labor. In his cohort, 70% of whom were between 20 and 30 years old, many were Caucasian, and 55% of women were delivered via forceps. Dr. Friedman classically identified the second stage of labor starting at 4cm dilatation. Since the mid-20th century, many practice patterns have changed, and today’s population of women delivering in the United States is diverse and, on average, older and heavier than in 1955; therefore, use of the traditional labor curve has been questioned. The investigators in this study performed a secondary analysis of data from a multicenter cohort of 26,838 patients with singleton gestation, spontaneous labor, and normal outcomes. Using a sophisticated statistical approach Zhang et al. produced a modern labor curve.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Natural History of the Normal First Stage of Labor Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Birth Defects Maternal Morbidity Associated With Multiple Repeat Cesarean Deliveries Cell-Free DNA Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Maternal Morbidity and Obstetric Care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1