跨文化视角下政党运动的权力动态:参与与选举政治之间的平民党和五星运动

Cristiano Gianolla
{"title":"跨文化视角下政党运动的权力动态:参与与选举政治之间的平民党和五星运动","authors":"Cristiano Gianolla","doi":"10.12893/GJCPI.2017.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political parties are privileged phenomena from which to analyse and understand political power dynamics; this article focuses on a specific type: partymovements. These are considered to be particularly interesting because they have emerged from civil society, carry innovative political ideas based on participation and entail new forms of sharing political power. Looking very closely at the power dynamics within party-movements, this empirical research (based on two cases of ethnographic fieldwork conducted in India and Italy) comparatively investigates the power dynamics between local and national centres of power within the participatory approaches of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S). The comparison takes place between two similar political phenomena of two culturally and geographically different political systems and provides further evidence in relation to representative democracy. In both cases, party-movements infuse a new enthusiasm into politics with the promise to redistribute power at the local level through participation. However, in order to compete with the power of other political parties within the electoral arena, party-movements need to be united political entities and de facto they relegate political participation under the primacy of party centralism. This resultantly has an impact at the local and national levels. Furthermore, the comparison of party-movements pertaining to diverse political landscapes emphasises the transcultural tendency of the power dynamics in representative systems in which participation is subdued to centralisation.","PeriodicalId":342668,"journal":{"name":"Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation","volume":"42 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Party-movement's power dynamics in transcultural perspectives: the AAP and the M5S between participation and electoral politics\",\"authors\":\"Cristiano Gianolla\",\"doi\":\"10.12893/GJCPI.2017.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Political parties are privileged phenomena from which to analyse and understand political power dynamics; this article focuses on a specific type: partymovements. These are considered to be particularly interesting because they have emerged from civil society, carry innovative political ideas based on participation and entail new forms of sharing political power. Looking very closely at the power dynamics within party-movements, this empirical research (based on two cases of ethnographic fieldwork conducted in India and Italy) comparatively investigates the power dynamics between local and national centres of power within the participatory approaches of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S). The comparison takes place between two similar political phenomena of two culturally and geographically different political systems and provides further evidence in relation to representative democracy. In both cases, party-movements infuse a new enthusiasm into politics with the promise to redistribute power at the local level through participation. However, in order to compete with the power of other political parties within the electoral arena, party-movements need to be united political entities and de facto they relegate political participation under the primacy of party centralism. This resultantly has an impact at the local and national levels. Furthermore, the comparison of party-movements pertaining to diverse political landscapes emphasises the transcultural tendency of the power dynamics in representative systems in which participation is subdued to centralisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"42 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12893/GJCPI.2017.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12893/GJCPI.2017.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

政党是分析和理解政治权力动态的特权现象;本文关注的是一种特殊类型:政党运动。它们被认为特别有趣,因为它们产生于民间社会,具有基于参与的创新政治思想,并涉及分享政治权力的新形式。这项实证研究(基于在印度和意大利进行的两个民族志田野调查案例)非常仔细地观察了政党运动中的权力动态,比较研究了平民党(Aam Aadmi Party, AAP)和五星运动(moimento 5 Stelle, M5S)的参与式方法中地方和国家权力中心之间的权力动态。比较发生在两种文化和地理上不同的政治制度的两种相似的政治现象之间,并为代议制民主提供了进一步的证据。在这两种情况下,政党运动都为政治注入了新的热情,并承诺通过参与在地方一级重新分配权力。然而,为了在选举舞台上与其他政党的权力竞争,政党运动需要成为统一的政治实体,事实上,它们将政治参与置于政党集中制的首要地位之下。结果,这在地方和国家两级都产生了影响。此外,与不同政治景观相关的政党运动的比较强调了代议制中权力动态的跨文化趋势,在代议制中,参与被集中控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Party-movement's power dynamics in transcultural perspectives: the AAP and the M5S between participation and electoral politics
Political parties are privileged phenomena from which to analyse and understand political power dynamics; this article focuses on a specific type: partymovements. These are considered to be particularly interesting because they have emerged from civil society, carry innovative political ideas based on participation and entail new forms of sharing political power. Looking very closely at the power dynamics within party-movements, this empirical research (based on two cases of ethnographic fieldwork conducted in India and Italy) comparatively investigates the power dynamics between local and national centres of power within the participatory approaches of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Movimento 5 Stelle (M5S). The comparison takes place between two similar political phenomena of two culturally and geographically different political systems and provides further evidence in relation to representative democracy. In both cases, party-movements infuse a new enthusiasm into politics with the promise to redistribute power at the local level through participation. However, in order to compete with the power of other political parties within the electoral arena, party-movements need to be united political entities and de facto they relegate political participation under the primacy of party centralism. This resultantly has an impact at the local and national levels. Furthermore, the comparison of party-movements pertaining to diverse political landscapes emphasises the transcultural tendency of the power dynamics in representative systems in which participation is subdued to centralisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WELL-BEING: THREATS AND ACHIEVEMENTS IN SEARCH OF EQUITY: ORISSAN TRIBAL HISTORIOGRAPHY’S SEARCH FOR JUSTICE AGAINST COLONIAL INJUSTICE LIFE CHANCES IN A (UN)SUSTAINABLE WORLD THE SPARŚA PROJECT: BUILDING A COMPREHENSIVE MENSTRUAL HEALTH MANAGEMENT INTERVENTION IN NEPAL EXPLORING COVID-19 AND SOCIAL CONFLICT IN AFRICA: NIGERIA AS A CASE STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1