{"title":"Götz希利和他寻找真正的马卡连科。他发现了什么?","authors":"D. Waterkamp","doi":"10.53308/ide.v5i2.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beginning in the twenties of the previous century, the writings of Anton Semjonovitch Makarenko, an educator who was born in the Ukranian part of the former Russia and mainly spoke and wrote in Russian, attracted much attention among educators not only in the Russian-speaking world and in communist states but also in the Western world and other countries. He lived from 1888-1939, which means that the bulk of his writings were published in the Stalinist period of the Soviet Union. The most detailed investigations into his writings and professional and private life were accomplished by the West German researcher Götz Hillig (born 1938) at the University of Marburg. He dedicated his professional life to the famous educator and produced a critical edition of Makarenko’s important works together with a multitude of analyses and commentaries covering most of the disputed questions regarding his life and work. To most of them he found a convincing answer. So far, Hillig’s immense, yet diversely published work has not been explored to see which new picture of Makarenko can be drawn from Hillig’s scrutiny. He himself did not finish this task as he focussed on delivering a fully clarified basis of texts and a complete history of Makarenko’s life. This article underpins the necessity of drawing conclusions from Hillig’s works and gives a first idea of the change in our picture of Makarenko which flows from Hillig’s work.","PeriodicalId":387459,"journal":{"name":"International Dialogues on Education Journal","volume":"4 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Götz Hillig and his search for the true Makarenko. What did he find?\",\"authors\":\"D. Waterkamp\",\"doi\":\"10.53308/ide.v5i2.70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Beginning in the twenties of the previous century, the writings of Anton Semjonovitch Makarenko, an educator who was born in the Ukranian part of the former Russia and mainly spoke and wrote in Russian, attracted much attention among educators not only in the Russian-speaking world and in communist states but also in the Western world and other countries. He lived from 1888-1939, which means that the bulk of his writings were published in the Stalinist period of the Soviet Union. The most detailed investigations into his writings and professional and private life were accomplished by the West German researcher Götz Hillig (born 1938) at the University of Marburg. He dedicated his professional life to the famous educator and produced a critical edition of Makarenko’s important works together with a multitude of analyses and commentaries covering most of the disputed questions regarding his life and work. To most of them he found a convincing answer. So far, Hillig’s immense, yet diversely published work has not been explored to see which new picture of Makarenko can be drawn from Hillig’s scrutiny. He himself did not finish this task as he focussed on delivering a fully clarified basis of texts and a complete history of Makarenko’s life. This article underpins the necessity of drawing conclusions from Hillig’s works and gives a first idea of the change in our picture of Makarenko which flows from Hillig’s work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Dialogues on Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"4 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Dialogues on Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53308/ide.v5i2.70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Dialogues on Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53308/ide.v5i2.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
安东·谢姆约诺维奇·马卡连科是一位出生在前俄罗斯乌克兰地区,主要用俄语说话和写作的教育家,从上世纪20年代开始,他的作品不仅在俄语世界和共产主义国家,而且在西方世界和其他国家都引起了教育家的广泛关注。他生于1888年至1939年,这意味着他的大部分作品都是在苏联斯大林主义时期发表的。马尔堡大学(University of Marburg)的西德研究员Götz Hillig(1938年出生)对他的作品、职业和私人生活进行了最详细的调查。他将自己的职业生涯奉献给了这位著名的教育家,并出版了马卡连科重要作品的评论版,其中包括大量的分析和评论,涵盖了有关他的生活和工作的大多数有争议的问题。对他们中的大多数人来说,他找到了一个令人信服的答案。到目前为止,还没有人对希利的大量出版的作品进行探索,看看从希利的审视中可以得出哪些关于马卡连科的新图景。他自己并没有完成这项任务,因为他专注于提供一个完全澄清的文本基础和马卡连科生活的完整历史。这篇文章强调了从希利格的作品中得出结论的必要性,并给出了希利格的作品给我们对马卡连科的看法带来的变化的第一个想法。
Götz Hillig and his search for the true Makarenko. What did he find?
Beginning in the twenties of the previous century, the writings of Anton Semjonovitch Makarenko, an educator who was born in the Ukranian part of the former Russia and mainly spoke and wrote in Russian, attracted much attention among educators not only in the Russian-speaking world and in communist states but also in the Western world and other countries. He lived from 1888-1939, which means that the bulk of his writings were published in the Stalinist period of the Soviet Union. The most detailed investigations into his writings and professional and private life were accomplished by the West German researcher Götz Hillig (born 1938) at the University of Marburg. He dedicated his professional life to the famous educator and produced a critical edition of Makarenko’s important works together with a multitude of analyses and commentaries covering most of the disputed questions regarding his life and work. To most of them he found a convincing answer. So far, Hillig’s immense, yet diversely published work has not been explored to see which new picture of Makarenko can be drawn from Hillig’s scrutiny. He himself did not finish this task as he focussed on delivering a fully clarified basis of texts and a complete history of Makarenko’s life. This article underpins the necessity of drawing conclusions from Hillig’s works and gives a first idea of the change in our picture of Makarenko which flows from Hillig’s work.