一项国际研究:医务人员对COVID-19大流行的态度和患者对大流行的知识水平

Michał Ćwiertnia, Tomasz P Ilczak, Kacper Sumera, E. Navarro-Illana, Mieczysław Dutka, M. Szlagor, Arkadiusz Stasicki, P. Białoń, M. Hajduga, M. Mikulska, R. Bobiński, Marek Kawecki
{"title":"一项国际研究:医务人员对COVID-19大流行的态度和患者对大流行的知识水平","authors":"Michał Ćwiertnia, Tomasz P Ilczak, Kacper Sumera, E. Navarro-Illana, Mieczysław Dutka, M. Szlagor, Arkadiusz Stasicki, P. Białoń, M. Hajduga, M. Mikulska, R. Bobiński, Marek Kawecki","doi":"10.36740/emems202302102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To assess knowledge of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and attitudes toward the pandemic among patients in seven European countries in the opinion of medical personnel. \nMaterial and methods: The research was conducted across seven European countries. The questionnaire included questions relating to the Covid-19 pan¬demic regarding medical personnel’s opinions on the level of patient education, the sharing of incorrect information by patients, the following of quarantine procedures by patients, and the necessity of introducing tighter sanitary restrictions. \nResults: The research indicated significant differences between countries in the answers provided by medical personnel. Medical personnel encountered the sharing of incorrect information by patients most often in Poland, and most seldom in Norway. Staff in the United Kingdom and Poland had the lowest as¬sessment of patients following quarantine procedures, while personnel in Norway had the most positive assessment in this area. Education of the patients on the SARS-CoV-2 virus was most positively assessed by personnel in Finland, and the most poorly by staff from Poland. The necessity to impose tighter sanitary restrictions was indicated by the greatest number of personnel in Poland and the United Kingdom, and by the lowest number in Spain. \nConclusions: The research indicated significant differences between countries in the provided answers. The study also demonstrated that as a rule the sanitary restrictions were supported.","PeriodicalId":433523,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medical Service","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes towards the COVID-19 pandemic and the level of knowledge about the pandemic among the patients in the opinion of medical personnel – an international study\",\"authors\":\"Michał Ćwiertnia, Tomasz P Ilczak, Kacper Sumera, E. Navarro-Illana, Mieczysław Dutka, M. Szlagor, Arkadiusz Stasicki, P. Białoń, M. Hajduga, M. Mikulska, R. Bobiński, Marek Kawecki\",\"doi\":\"10.36740/emems202302102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To assess knowledge of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and attitudes toward the pandemic among patients in seven European countries in the opinion of medical personnel. \\nMaterial and methods: The research was conducted across seven European countries. The questionnaire included questions relating to the Covid-19 pan¬demic regarding medical personnel’s opinions on the level of patient education, the sharing of incorrect information by patients, the following of quarantine procedures by patients, and the necessity of introducing tighter sanitary restrictions. \\nResults: The research indicated significant differences between countries in the answers provided by medical personnel. Medical personnel encountered the sharing of incorrect information by patients most often in Poland, and most seldom in Norway. Staff in the United Kingdom and Poland had the lowest as¬sessment of patients following quarantine procedures, while personnel in Norway had the most positive assessment in this area. Education of the patients on the SARS-CoV-2 virus was most positively assessed by personnel in Finland, and the most poorly by staff from Poland. The necessity to impose tighter sanitary restrictions was indicated by the greatest number of personnel in Poland and the United Kingdom, and by the lowest number in Spain. \\nConclusions: The research indicated significant differences between countries in the provided answers. The study also demonstrated that as a rule the sanitary restrictions were supported.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medical Service\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medical Service\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36740/emems202302102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medical Service","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36740/emems202302102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解欧洲7个国家医务人员对SARS-CoV-2病毒的认知和态度。材料和方法:这项研究在七个欧洲国家进行。问卷内容与新冠肺炎疫情有关,包括医务人员对患者教育水平的看法、患者分享错误信息的情况、患者遵守隔离程序的情况以及实施更严格卫生限制的必要性。结果:研究表明,各国医务人员提供的答案存在显著差异。医务人员在波兰最常遇到病人分享不正确信息的情况,在挪威最少见。联合王国和波兰的工作人员对遵循隔离程序的病人的评价最低,而挪威的工作人员在这方面的评价最积极。芬兰工作人员对患者的SARS-CoV-2病毒教育评价最积极,波兰工作人员评价最差。波兰和联合王国的人员人数最多,西班牙的人员人数最少,这表明有必要实行更严格的卫生限制。结论:研究表明,各国在提供的答案上存在显著差异。研究还表明,卫生限制通常是得到支持的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Attitudes towards the COVID-19 pandemic and the level of knowledge about the pandemic among the patients in the opinion of medical personnel – an international study
Aim: To assess knowledge of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and attitudes toward the pandemic among patients in seven European countries in the opinion of medical personnel. Material and methods: The research was conducted across seven European countries. The questionnaire included questions relating to the Covid-19 pan¬demic regarding medical personnel’s opinions on the level of patient education, the sharing of incorrect information by patients, the following of quarantine procedures by patients, and the necessity of introducing tighter sanitary restrictions. Results: The research indicated significant differences between countries in the answers provided by medical personnel. Medical personnel encountered the sharing of incorrect information by patients most often in Poland, and most seldom in Norway. Staff in the United Kingdom and Poland had the lowest as¬sessment of patients following quarantine procedures, while personnel in Norway had the most positive assessment in this area. Education of the patients on the SARS-CoV-2 virus was most positively assessed by personnel in Finland, and the most poorly by staff from Poland. The necessity to impose tighter sanitary restrictions was indicated by the greatest number of personnel in Poland and the United Kingdom, and by the lowest number in Spain. Conclusions: The research indicated significant differences between countries in the provided answers. The study also demonstrated that as a rule the sanitary restrictions were supported.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SELF-EVALUATION OF THE COMPLIANCE WITH HAND HYGIENE REGULATIONS BY PARAMEDICS IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAMS White Blood Cells Ratios in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes in Association with Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus METHOD OF ERYTHROCYTE PROTECTION IN URGENT CARDIAC SURGERY POSSIBILITIES OF DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC BRAIN ISCHEMIA FULMINANT SOFT TISSUE INFECTIONS CAUSED BY AEROBIC BACTERIA – A PARAMEDIC’S PERSPECTIVE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1