布尔加科夫小说《大师与玛格丽塔》中沃兰形象的比较研究与伊斯兰诺斯替派对“魔鬼”概念的解读

J. Karimi-Motahhar, Ashtijoo Arezoo, A. Kazieva
{"title":"布尔加科夫小说《大师与玛格丽塔》中沃兰形象的比较研究与伊斯兰诺斯替派对“魔鬼”概念的解读","authors":"J. Karimi-Motahhar, Ashtijoo Arezoo, A. Kazieva","doi":"10.21672/1818-4936-2021-77-1-143-149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of evil and the devil as a representative of evil has long existed in the religion and culture of different nations. This article attempts to find similarities on this issue in the novel “The Master and Margarita” by Mikhail Bulgakov (1891-1940) and in the approach of some Islamic Sufis, such as Mansur al-Hallaj (858-922) and Ain al-Kuzat Hamadani (1098-1131), etc. What is common in the image of the devil in the pages of the novel of a Russian writer of the twentieth century, a native of the Orthodox environment, and in the texts of medieval Islamic mystics? Common to representatives of these different cultures and eras is the desire to comprehend the problem of the existence of evil in the world and its embodiment in the form of the devil. The similarity is in the fact that the problem of evil and its bearer is posed by Bulgakov and Sufis both in a purely religious context, and in philosophical, Gnostic. In both Islam and Christianity, the devil (“Satan”, “Shaitan”) is the main opponent of the heavenly forces, which is the highest personification of evil and pushes a person on the path of spiritual death. In addition to the religious context, the devil is seen as the result of a Gnostic and mystical approach by different thinkers in the form of an artistic image.","PeriodicalId":331870,"journal":{"name":"HUMANITARIAN RESEARCHES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE IMAGE OF WOLAND IN THE NOVEL “THE MASTER AND MARGARITA” BY M. BULGAKOV AND THE ISLAMIC GNOSTIC APPROACH TO THE CONCEPT OF “DEVIL”\",\"authors\":\"J. Karimi-Motahhar, Ashtijoo Arezoo, A. Kazieva\",\"doi\":\"10.21672/1818-4936-2021-77-1-143-149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of evil and the devil as a representative of evil has long existed in the religion and culture of different nations. This article attempts to find similarities on this issue in the novel “The Master and Margarita” by Mikhail Bulgakov (1891-1940) and in the approach of some Islamic Sufis, such as Mansur al-Hallaj (858-922) and Ain al-Kuzat Hamadani (1098-1131), etc. What is common in the image of the devil in the pages of the novel of a Russian writer of the twentieth century, a native of the Orthodox environment, and in the texts of medieval Islamic mystics? Common to representatives of these different cultures and eras is the desire to comprehend the problem of the existence of evil in the world and its embodiment in the form of the devil. The similarity is in the fact that the problem of evil and its bearer is posed by Bulgakov and Sufis both in a purely religious context, and in philosophical, Gnostic. In both Islam and Christianity, the devil (“Satan”, “Shaitan”) is the main opponent of the heavenly forces, which is the highest personification of evil and pushes a person on the path of spiritual death. In addition to the religious context, the devil is seen as the result of a Gnostic and mystical approach by different thinkers in the form of an artistic image.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HUMANITARIAN RESEARCHES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HUMANITARIAN RESEARCHES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21672/1818-4936-2021-77-1-143-149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HUMANITARIAN RESEARCHES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21672/1818-4936-2021-77-1-143-149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

邪恶和魔鬼作为邪恶代表的问题,长期存在于不同民族的宗教和文化中。本文试图在米哈伊尔·布尔加科夫(Mikhail Bulgakov, 1891-1940)的小说《大师与玛格丽塔》(the Master and Margarita)和一些伊斯兰苏菲派的做法中找到相似之处,如曼苏尔·哈拉杰(Mansur al-Hallaj, 858-922)和艾因·库扎特·哈马达尼(Ain al-Kuzat Hamadani, 1098-1131)等。在二十世纪俄罗斯作家的小说中,一个土生土长的东正教环境中的魔鬼形象,在中世纪伊斯兰神秘主义者的文本中,有什么共同之处?这些不同文化和时代的代表所共有的是,他们都渴望理解世界上邪恶的存在及其以魔鬼的形式体现的问题。相似之处在于,布尔加科夫和苏菲派在纯粹的宗教背景和哲学的诺斯替主义背景下提出了邪恶及其承载者的问题。在伊斯兰教和基督教中,魔鬼(“撒旦”,“撒但”)是天上力量的主要对手,它是邪恶的最高化身,把人推向精神死亡的道路。除了宗教背景,魔鬼被看作是诺斯替主义和神秘主义的结果,由不同的思想家以艺术形象的形式出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE IMAGE OF WOLAND IN THE NOVEL “THE MASTER AND MARGARITA” BY M. BULGAKOV AND THE ISLAMIC GNOSTIC APPROACH TO THE CONCEPT OF “DEVIL”
The problem of evil and the devil as a representative of evil has long existed in the religion and culture of different nations. This article attempts to find similarities on this issue in the novel “The Master and Margarita” by Mikhail Bulgakov (1891-1940) and in the approach of some Islamic Sufis, such as Mansur al-Hallaj (858-922) and Ain al-Kuzat Hamadani (1098-1131), etc. What is common in the image of the devil in the pages of the novel of a Russian writer of the twentieth century, a native of the Orthodox environment, and in the texts of medieval Islamic mystics? Common to representatives of these different cultures and eras is the desire to comprehend the problem of the existence of evil in the world and its embodiment in the form of the devil. The similarity is in the fact that the problem of evil and its bearer is posed by Bulgakov and Sufis both in a purely religious context, and in philosophical, Gnostic. In both Islam and Christianity, the devil (“Satan”, “Shaitan”) is the main opponent of the heavenly forces, which is the highest personification of evil and pushes a person on the path of spiritual death. In addition to the religious context, the devil is seen as the result of a Gnostic and mystical approach by different thinkers in the form of an artistic image.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
USING GRAMMATICAL PARTICULARITIES OF FRENCH IN THE COMMENTS (THROUGH THE EXAMPLE OF SOCIAL NETWORK “YOUTUBE”) MEANS OF ADDRESSING IN SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL TEXT PROXEMES TYPOLOGY IN THE POINT OF VIEW OF ROMANCE AND CERMANIC TRANSLATION FEATURES OF THE TRANSMISSION OF PUNCTUATION MARKS IN THE TRANSLATION OF POETIC TEXTS FROM RUSSIAN INTO FRENCH PECULARITIES OF LACUNA TRANSLATION FRON TURKISH INTO RUSSIAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1