{"title":"网络物理系统EDA","authors":"S. Chakraborty","doi":"10.1109/ISED.2017.8303904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, electronic design automation (EDA) has been moving up the design abstraction ladder. Starting from automating tasks like placement, floor-planning and routing in integrated circuits design, EDA now encompasses many system-level design tasks. However, the next challenge facing the EDA community is to develop methods and also tools for cyber-physical systems (CPS) design. For these systems, physical processes, control algorithms that control these processes, and the computation and communication platforms on which these control algorithms are implemented — are all modeled and designed in a tightly integrated fashion. Currently available EDA methods and tools are not equipped to handle such integrated modeling and design. In particular, there is a big disconnect between modeling tools — like Matlab/Simulink — that are used for modeling plant dynamics and designing their controllers, and the tools that are used to design and configure the hardware/software platforms on which these controllers are eventually implemented. In this extended abstract we discuss the consequences of this disconnect and possible ways of addressing this situation.","PeriodicalId":147019,"journal":{"name":"2017 7th International Symposium on Embedded Computing and System Design (ISED)","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EDA for cyber-physical systems\",\"authors\":\"S. Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISED.2017.8303904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the years, electronic design automation (EDA) has been moving up the design abstraction ladder. Starting from automating tasks like placement, floor-planning and routing in integrated circuits design, EDA now encompasses many system-level design tasks. However, the next challenge facing the EDA community is to develop methods and also tools for cyber-physical systems (CPS) design. For these systems, physical processes, control algorithms that control these processes, and the computation and communication platforms on which these control algorithms are implemented — are all modeled and designed in a tightly integrated fashion. Currently available EDA methods and tools are not equipped to handle such integrated modeling and design. In particular, there is a big disconnect between modeling tools — like Matlab/Simulink — that are used for modeling plant dynamics and designing their controllers, and the tools that are used to design and configure the hardware/software platforms on which these controllers are eventually implemented. In this extended abstract we discuss the consequences of this disconnect and possible ways of addressing this situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 7th International Symposium on Embedded Computing and System Design (ISED)\",\"volume\":\"164 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 7th International Symposium on Embedded Computing and System Design (ISED)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISED.2017.8303904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 7th International Symposium on Embedded Computing and System Design (ISED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISED.2017.8303904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Over the years, electronic design automation (EDA) has been moving up the design abstraction ladder. Starting from automating tasks like placement, floor-planning and routing in integrated circuits design, EDA now encompasses many system-level design tasks. However, the next challenge facing the EDA community is to develop methods and also tools for cyber-physical systems (CPS) design. For these systems, physical processes, control algorithms that control these processes, and the computation and communication platforms on which these control algorithms are implemented — are all modeled and designed in a tightly integrated fashion. Currently available EDA methods and tools are not equipped to handle such integrated modeling and design. In particular, there is a big disconnect between modeling tools — like Matlab/Simulink — that are used for modeling plant dynamics and designing their controllers, and the tools that are used to design and configure the hardware/software platforms on which these controllers are eventually implemented. In this extended abstract we discuss the consequences of this disconnect and possible ways of addressing this situation.