{"title":"网络物理系统EDA","authors":"S. Chakraborty","doi":"10.1109/ISED.2017.8303904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the years, electronic design automation (EDA) has been moving up the design abstraction ladder. Starting from automating tasks like placement, floor-planning and routing in integrated circuits design, EDA now encompasses many system-level design tasks. However, the next challenge facing the EDA community is to develop methods and also tools for cyber-physical systems (CPS) design. For these systems, physical processes, control algorithms that control these processes, and the computation and communication platforms on which these control algorithms are implemented — are all modeled and designed in a tightly integrated fashion. Currently available EDA methods and tools are not equipped to handle such integrated modeling and design. In particular, there is a big disconnect between modeling tools — like Matlab/Simulink — that are used for modeling plant dynamics and designing their controllers, and the tools that are used to design and configure the hardware/software platforms on which these controllers are eventually implemented. In this extended abstract we discuss the consequences of this disconnect and possible ways of addressing this situation.","PeriodicalId":147019,"journal":{"name":"2017 7th International Symposium on Embedded Computing and System Design (ISED)","volume":"164 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EDA for cyber-physical systems\",\"authors\":\"S. Chakraborty\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISED.2017.8303904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the years, electronic design automation (EDA) has been moving up the design abstraction ladder. Starting from automating tasks like placement, floor-planning and routing in integrated circuits design, EDA now encompasses many system-level design tasks. However, the next challenge facing the EDA community is to develop methods and also tools for cyber-physical systems (CPS) design. For these systems, physical processes, control algorithms that control these processes, and the computation and communication platforms on which these control algorithms are implemented — are all modeled and designed in a tightly integrated fashion. Currently available EDA methods and tools are not equipped to handle such integrated modeling and design. In particular, there is a big disconnect between modeling tools — like Matlab/Simulink — that are used for modeling plant dynamics and designing their controllers, and the tools that are used to design and configure the hardware/software platforms on which these controllers are eventually implemented. In this extended abstract we discuss the consequences of this disconnect and possible ways of addressing this situation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 7th International Symposium on Embedded Computing and System Design (ISED)\",\"volume\":\"164 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 7th International Symposium on Embedded Computing and System Design (ISED)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISED.2017.8303904\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 7th International Symposium on Embedded Computing and System Design (ISED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISED.2017.8303904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,电子设计自动化(EDA)一直在朝着设计抽象的方向发展。从集成电路设计中的自动化任务,如放置、地板规划和路由开始,EDA现在包含许多系统级设计任务。然而,EDA社区面临的下一个挑战是开发用于网络物理系统(CPS)设计的方法和工具。对于这些系统,物理过程、控制这些过程的控制算法,以及实现这些控制算法的计算和通信平台,都是以紧密集成的方式建模和设计的。目前可用的EDA方法和工具不具备处理这种集成建模和设计的能力。特别是,建模工具(如Matlab/Simulink)用于对工厂动力学建模和设计其控制器,而用于设计和配置这些控制器最终实现的硬件/软件平台的工具之间存在很大的脱节。在这篇扩展的摘要中,我们讨论了这种脱节的后果和解决这种情况的可能方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EDA for cyber-physical systems
Over the years, electronic design automation (EDA) has been moving up the design abstraction ladder. Starting from automating tasks like placement, floor-planning and routing in integrated circuits design, EDA now encompasses many system-level design tasks. However, the next challenge facing the EDA community is to develop methods and also tools for cyber-physical systems (CPS) design. For these systems, physical processes, control algorithms that control these processes, and the computation and communication platforms on which these control algorithms are implemented — are all modeled and designed in a tightly integrated fashion. Currently available EDA methods and tools are not equipped to handle such integrated modeling and design. In particular, there is a big disconnect between modeling tools — like Matlab/Simulink — that are used for modeling plant dynamics and designing their controllers, and the tools that are used to design and configure the hardware/software platforms on which these controllers are eventually implemented. In this extended abstract we discuss the consequences of this disconnect and possible ways of addressing this situation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OTORNoC: Optical tree of rings network on chip for 1000 core systems A new memory scheduling policy for real time systems All optical design of cost efficient multiplier circuit using terahertz optical asymmetric demultiplexer Application of variational mode decomposition and ABC optimized DAG-SVM in arrhythmia analysis An empirical study on performance of branch predictors with varying storage budgets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1