两大洲的课程研究:教师教学法、影响和过程中的语境差异

V. Collet, N. Nakawa
{"title":"两大洲的课程研究:教师教学法、影响和过程中的语境差异","authors":"V. Collet, N. Nakawa","doi":"10.1108/ijlls-03-2022-0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study was to better understand how lesson study (LS) impacts the pedagogy and attitudes of teachers in varied sociocultural contexts. The authors investigated responses of teachers in Kenya and the USA who were new to LS.Design/methodology/approach Teacher interviews after LS were qualitatively and inductively analyzed with Teacher Education and Development Study: Learning to Teach Mathematics as a conceptual/analytical framework.Findings Results varied between Kenyan and US teachers. Kenyan teachers reported increases in content and pedagogical content knowledge. They suggested participating in LS was an enjoyable, productive struggle and emphasized the value of planning for lessons and the role of the outside expert. US teachers described consideration of students' needs, abilities, and learning strategies. They described LS as a positive experience, even though making time for the process was challenging. Procedurally, US teachers valued research and collaboration. Although both the process and responses differed, US and Kenyan teachers' reflections highlight affordances of LS.Research limitations/implications This study is a small-scale, comparative case study. Future research could ask similar research questions in other contexts and with greater numbers of participants.Practical implications Views of teaching and learning and typical structures for teachers' professional learning vary by context; these factors should be considered when planning and implementing LS.Originality/value The study responds to an identified need to learn more about how LS contributes to teachers’ different views of teaching and learning, which are embedded in various sociocultural settings.","PeriodicalId":408622,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lesson study on two continents: contextual differences reflected in teachers’ pedagogy, affect and processes\",\"authors\":\"V. Collet, N. Nakawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijlls-03-2022-0043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose The purpose of this study was to better understand how lesson study (LS) impacts the pedagogy and attitudes of teachers in varied sociocultural contexts. The authors investigated responses of teachers in Kenya and the USA who were new to LS.Design/methodology/approach Teacher interviews after LS were qualitatively and inductively analyzed with Teacher Education and Development Study: Learning to Teach Mathematics as a conceptual/analytical framework.Findings Results varied between Kenyan and US teachers. Kenyan teachers reported increases in content and pedagogical content knowledge. They suggested participating in LS was an enjoyable, productive struggle and emphasized the value of planning for lessons and the role of the outside expert. US teachers described consideration of students' needs, abilities, and learning strategies. They described LS as a positive experience, even though making time for the process was challenging. Procedurally, US teachers valued research and collaboration. Although both the process and responses differed, US and Kenyan teachers' reflections highlight affordances of LS.Research limitations/implications This study is a small-scale, comparative case study. Future research could ask similar research questions in other contexts and with greater numbers of participants.Practical implications Views of teaching and learning and typical structures for teachers' professional learning vary by context; these factors should be considered when planning and implementing LS.Originality/value The study responds to an identified need to learn more about how LS contributes to teachers’ different views of teaching and learning, which are embedded in various sociocultural settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-03-2022-0043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlls-03-2022-0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是为了更好地了解不同社会文化背景下,课程学习如何影响教师的教学法和态度。作者调查了肯尼亚和美国初学LS的教师的反应。设计/方法/方法LS后的教师访谈用教师教育与发展研究:学习教数学作为一个概念/分析框架进行定性和归纳分析。结果在肯尼亚和美国教师之间有所不同。肯尼亚教师报告了教学内容和教学内容知识的增加。他们认为参加LS是一种愉快的、富有成效的斗争,并强调了计划课程的价值和外部专家的作用。美国教师描述了对学生需求、能力和学习策略的考虑。他们将LS描述为一种积极的体验,尽管为这个过程腾出时间很有挑战性。从程序上讲,美国老师重视研究和合作。尽管过程和反应不同,但美国和肯尼亚教师的反思突出了LS的启示。本研究是一个小规模的比较案例研究。未来的研究可能会在其他背景下和更多的参与者中提出类似的研究问题。教学与学习的观点和教师专业学习的典型结构因情境而异;在规划和实施LS时应考虑这些因素。原创性/价值本研究回应了一种明确的需要,即更多地了解LS如何影响教师不同的教与学观点,这些观点根植于不同的社会文化背景中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lesson study on two continents: contextual differences reflected in teachers’ pedagogy, affect and processes
Purpose The purpose of this study was to better understand how lesson study (LS) impacts the pedagogy and attitudes of teachers in varied sociocultural contexts. The authors investigated responses of teachers in Kenya and the USA who were new to LS.Design/methodology/approach Teacher interviews after LS were qualitatively and inductively analyzed with Teacher Education and Development Study: Learning to Teach Mathematics as a conceptual/analytical framework.Findings Results varied between Kenyan and US teachers. Kenyan teachers reported increases in content and pedagogical content knowledge. They suggested participating in LS was an enjoyable, productive struggle and emphasized the value of planning for lessons and the role of the outside expert. US teachers described consideration of students' needs, abilities, and learning strategies. They described LS as a positive experience, even though making time for the process was challenging. Procedurally, US teachers valued research and collaboration. Although both the process and responses differed, US and Kenyan teachers' reflections highlight affordances of LS.Research limitations/implications This study is a small-scale, comparative case study. Future research could ask similar research questions in other contexts and with greater numbers of participants.Practical implications Views of teaching and learning and typical structures for teachers' professional learning vary by context; these factors should be considered when planning and implementing LS.Originality/value The study responds to an identified need to learn more about how LS contributes to teachers’ different views of teaching and learning, which are embedded in various sociocultural settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adapting lesson study for early-years practitioners Book review: Reforming lesson study in Japan: theories of action for schools as learning communities Book review: Lesson study with mathematics and science preservice teachers: finding the forms Lesson study in science teacher preparation programs: a literature review Design-based research to develop lesson study for transformative assessment: teachers’ reactions, learning, organizational support, and use
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1