一种在一套武器系统要求中优化可靠性分配的面向客户的方法

J.J. Hadel, P. Lakey
{"title":"一种在一套武器系统要求中优化可靠性分配的面向客户的方法","authors":"J.J. Hadel, P. Lakey","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1995.513229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A systems engineering approach to weapon system requirements allocation demands that all system level performance requirements, including reliability, be flowed down and allocated to lower-level sub functions using a logical, structured methodology. Normally it is not in the customer's best interest to contractually specify MTBF design parameters developed from system requirements because such action borders on dictating hardware design solutions instead of focusing on communicating customer overall needs and desires to the development agency. Because of this, the requirements flowdown process appears to offer opportunities for multiple feasible solutions, all of which are capable of meeting the customer's top level requirements.","PeriodicalId":143102,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A customer-oriented approach to optimizing reliability-allocation within a set of weapon-system requirements\",\"authors\":\"J.J. Hadel, P. Lakey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.1995.513229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A systems engineering approach to weapon system requirements allocation demands that all system level performance requirements, including reliability, be flowed down and allocated to lower-level sub functions using a logical, structured methodology. Normally it is not in the customer's best interest to contractually specify MTBF design parameters developed from system requirements because such action borders on dictating hardware design solutions instead of focusing on communicating customer overall needs and desires to the development agency. Because of this, the requirements flowdown process appears to offer opportunities for multiple feasible solutions, all of which are capable of meeting the customer's top level requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1995.513229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1995.513229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

武器系统需求分配的系统工程方法要求所有系统级性能需求,包括可靠性,使用逻辑的、结构化的方法向下流动并分配给较低级别的子功能。通常情况下,以合同的方式指定从系统需求中开发的MTBF设计参数并不符合客户的最佳利益,因为这种行为接近于规定硬件设计解决方案,而不是专注于与开发机构沟通客户的总体需求和愿望。正因为如此,需求流程似乎为多个可行的解决方案提供了机会,所有这些解决方案都能够满足客户的顶级需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A customer-oriented approach to optimizing reliability-allocation within a set of weapon-system requirements
A systems engineering approach to weapon system requirements allocation demands that all system level performance requirements, including reliability, be flowed down and allocated to lower-level sub functions using a logical, structured methodology. Normally it is not in the customer's best interest to contractually specify MTBF design parameters developed from system requirements because such action borders on dictating hardware design solutions instead of focusing on communicating customer overall needs and desires to the development agency. Because of this, the requirements flowdown process appears to offer opportunities for multiple feasible solutions, all of which are capable of meeting the customer's top level requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of hardware and software faults on ARQ schemes-an experimental study A verification tool to measure software in critical systems Understanding and solving the real reliability assurance problems Applying fuzzy cognitive-maps knowledge-representation to failure modes effects analysis Mass-transit system service quality: tradeoff analysis on reliability, maintainability and logistics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1