微血管减压术后脑脊液漏的诊断及腰椎引流管处理

D. Seo, K. Cho, Hyun Seok Lee, Kwan Park
{"title":"微血管减压术后脑脊液漏的诊断及腰椎引流管处理","authors":"D. Seo, K. Cho, Hyun Seok Lee, Kwan Park","doi":"10.52662/jksfn.2022.00248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: In posterior fossa surgery such as microvascular decompression (MVD), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a crucial problem. In this study, we explored the accurate diagnosis and effective non-surgical management of postoperative CSF leakage.Methods: We reviewed 749 patients who underwent MVD surgery from August 2018 to April 2022. Although we significantly reduced the CSF leakage problem by using the triple-layer closing technique (TLCT), CSF leakage was still a problem in a few cases. We managed these patients with the same diagnostic flow and treatment regimen using a lumbar drain (LD).Results: Among the 749 patients in the cohort, 11 (1.4%) had CSF leakage, and each of those cases presented with rhinorrhea. Five patients (45.5%) had the symptom on the first day, two patients (18.2%) on the second day, one patient (9.1%) on the third day, and three patients (27.3%) on the fifth day after surgery. After conservative treatment including CSF drainage via LD for 5.4 days on average, none of the patients had recurrent symptoms suggesting CSF leakage; thus, there was no need for wound repair surgery.Conclusion: Despite diligent attempts to prevent CSF leakage in open microsurgery, leaks inevitably occur in some cases and are more frequent in posterior fossa surgery. Although we cannot fully prevent leakage, we should limit the complication to ensure that it does not progress into other severe problems, such as meningitis. A closing technique such as TLCT is useful, but the early diagnosis and management of CSF leakage with LD is also important.","PeriodicalId":193825,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","volume":"170 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after microvascular decompression surgery and management via lumbar drain\",\"authors\":\"D. Seo, K. Cho, Hyun Seok Lee, Kwan Park\",\"doi\":\"10.52662/jksfn.2022.00248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: In posterior fossa surgery such as microvascular decompression (MVD), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a crucial problem. In this study, we explored the accurate diagnosis and effective non-surgical management of postoperative CSF leakage.Methods: We reviewed 749 patients who underwent MVD surgery from August 2018 to April 2022. Although we significantly reduced the CSF leakage problem by using the triple-layer closing technique (TLCT), CSF leakage was still a problem in a few cases. We managed these patients with the same diagnostic flow and treatment regimen using a lumbar drain (LD).Results: Among the 749 patients in the cohort, 11 (1.4%) had CSF leakage, and each of those cases presented with rhinorrhea. Five patients (45.5%) had the symptom on the first day, two patients (18.2%) on the second day, one patient (9.1%) on the third day, and three patients (27.3%) on the fifth day after surgery. After conservative treatment including CSF drainage via LD for 5.4 days on average, none of the patients had recurrent symptoms suggesting CSF leakage; thus, there was no need for wound repair surgery.Conclusion: Despite diligent attempts to prevent CSF leakage in open microsurgery, leaks inevitably occur in some cases and are more frequent in posterior fossa surgery. Although we cannot fully prevent leakage, we should limit the complication to ensure that it does not progress into other severe problems, such as meningitis. A closing technique such as TLCT is useful, but the early diagnosis and management of CSF leakage with LD is also important.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"170 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52662/jksfn.2022.00248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52662/jksfn.2022.00248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在后颅窝微血管减压术(MVD)中,脑脊液(CSF)渗漏是一个关键问题。在本研究中,我们探讨了术后脑脊液漏的准确诊断和有效的非手术治疗。方法:我们回顾了2018年8月至2022年4月期间接受MVD手术的749例患者。虽然我们使用三层闭合技术(TLCT)显著减少了脑脊液漏的问题,但仍有少数病例存在脑脊液漏的问题。我们对这些患者采用相同的诊断流程和腰椎引流(LD)治疗方案。结果:在该队列的749例患者中,11例(1.4%)出现脑脊液漏,且均出现鼻漏。术后第1天出现症状5例(45.5%),第2天出现症状2例(18.2%),第3天出现症状1例(9.1%),第5天出现症状3例(27.3%)。经经LD引流等保守治疗平均5.4 d后,无一例患者出现脑脊液漏症状复发;因此,不需要进行伤口修复手术。结论:尽管在开放性显微手术中努力防止脑脊液渗漏,但在某些情况下仍不可避免地发生渗漏,在后颅窝手术中更为常见。虽然我们不能完全防止渗漏,我们应该限制并发症,以确保它不会发展成其他严重的问题,如脑膜炎。闭合技术如TLCT是有用的,但早期诊断和处理LD脑脊液渗漏也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after microvascular decompression surgery and management via lumbar drain
Objective: In posterior fossa surgery such as microvascular decompression (MVD), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage is a crucial problem. In this study, we explored the accurate diagnosis and effective non-surgical management of postoperative CSF leakage.Methods: We reviewed 749 patients who underwent MVD surgery from August 2018 to April 2022. Although we significantly reduced the CSF leakage problem by using the triple-layer closing technique (TLCT), CSF leakage was still a problem in a few cases. We managed these patients with the same diagnostic flow and treatment regimen using a lumbar drain (LD).Results: Among the 749 patients in the cohort, 11 (1.4%) had CSF leakage, and each of those cases presented with rhinorrhea. Five patients (45.5%) had the symptom on the first day, two patients (18.2%) on the second day, one patient (9.1%) on the third day, and three patients (27.3%) on the fifth day after surgery. After conservative treatment including CSF drainage via LD for 5.4 days on average, none of the patients had recurrent symptoms suggesting CSF leakage; thus, there was no need for wound repair surgery.Conclusion: Despite diligent attempts to prevent CSF leakage in open microsurgery, leaks inevitably occur in some cases and are more frequent in posterior fossa surgery. Although we cannot fully prevent leakage, we should limit the complication to ensure that it does not progress into other severe problems, such as meningitis. A closing technique such as TLCT is useful, but the early diagnosis and management of CSF leakage with LD is also important.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robotic surgery for microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm: a feasibility study Stereotactic brain biopsy of John Cunningham virus-polymerase chain reaction-negative progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: a case report Changes in theta and gamma oscillations of the medial prefrontal cortex following hippocampal-focused ultrasound stimulation The first treatment option for secondary trigeminal neuralgia: open surgery versus stereotactic radiosurgery Radiation-induced change after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1