使用网络分析评估大规模数字化

Emily Lapworth
{"title":"使用网络分析评估大规模数字化","authors":"Emily Lapworth","doi":"10.1108/DLP-09-2020-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to assess the use of digital collections created via the large-scale digitization of archival collections. The large-scale digitization method specifically examined is the reuse of archival description from finding aids to create digital collections that consist mainly of compound digital objects, equivalent to a folder of items, minimally described at the aggregate level. This paper compares Web analytics data for two large-scale digital collections and one digital collection with rich, item-level description.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study analyzed one year of Web analytics for three digital collections. The main research question of this study is: Are digital collections of minimally described compound objects used less than digital collections of richly described single objects?\n\n\nFindings\nThis study found that the large-scale digital collections analyzed received less use than the traditional item-level collection, when examined at the item level. At the object level, the large-scale collections did not always receive less use than the traditional item-level collection.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study is limited to three different digital collections from one institution. Web analytics also represent a limited interpretation of “use.”\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study presents a method for other institutions to assess their own large-scale digitization efforts and contributes to the profession’s understanding of the impact of large-scale digitization.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper is unique because it uses Web analytics to compare the use of large-scale digital collections to the use of traditional boutique digital collections.\n","PeriodicalId":438470,"journal":{"name":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing large-scale digitization using Web analytics\",\"authors\":\"Emily Lapworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/DLP-09-2020-0095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this study is to assess the use of digital collections created via the large-scale digitization of archival collections. The large-scale digitization method specifically examined is the reuse of archival description from finding aids to create digital collections that consist mainly of compound digital objects, equivalent to a folder of items, minimally described at the aggregate level. This paper compares Web analytics data for two large-scale digital collections and one digital collection with rich, item-level description.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study analyzed one year of Web analytics for three digital collections. The main research question of this study is: Are digital collections of minimally described compound objects used less than digital collections of richly described single objects?\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study found that the large-scale digital collections analyzed received less use than the traditional item-level collection, when examined at the item level. At the object level, the large-scale collections did not always receive less use than the traditional item-level collection.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study is limited to three different digital collections from one institution. Web analytics also represent a limited interpretation of “use.”\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis study presents a method for other institutions to assess their own large-scale digitization efforts and contributes to the profession’s understanding of the impact of large-scale digitization.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper is unique because it uses Web analytics to compare the use of large-scale digital collections to the use of traditional boutique digital collections.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":438470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digit. Libr. Perspect.\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digit. Libr. Perspect.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-09-2020-0095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-09-2020-0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估档案馆藏大规模数位化所产生的数位馆藏的使用情况。特别研究的大规模数字化方法是通过寻找辅助工具来重复使用档案描述,以创建主要由复合数字对象组成的数字收藏,相当于一个项目文件夹,在聚合级别上进行最低限度的描述。本文比较了两个大型数字馆藏和一个具有丰富的项目级描述的数字馆藏的Web分析数据。设计/方法/方法本研究分析了三个数字馆藏一年的网络分析。本研究的主要研究问题是:描述最少的复合对象的数字集合是否比描述丰富的单个对象的数字集合使用得少?本研究发现,当在项目层面进行检查时,所分析的大规模数字馆藏比传统的项目级馆藏得到的使用更少。在对象级别,大规模集合并不总是比传统的项目级别集合得到更少的使用。研究局限/启示本研究仅限于来自同一机构的三个不同的数字馆藏。网络分析也代表了对“使用”的有限解释。本研究为其他机构评估其大规模数字化工作提供了一种方法,并有助于该行业了解大规模数字化的影响。原创性/价值这篇论文的独特之处在于,它使用网络分析来比较大规模数字收藏的使用与传统精品数字收藏的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing large-scale digitization using Web analytics
Purpose The purpose of this study is to assess the use of digital collections created via the large-scale digitization of archival collections. The large-scale digitization method specifically examined is the reuse of archival description from finding aids to create digital collections that consist mainly of compound digital objects, equivalent to a folder of items, minimally described at the aggregate level. This paper compares Web analytics data for two large-scale digital collections and one digital collection with rich, item-level description. Design/methodology/approach This study analyzed one year of Web analytics for three digital collections. The main research question of this study is: Are digital collections of minimally described compound objects used less than digital collections of richly described single objects? Findings This study found that the large-scale digital collections analyzed received less use than the traditional item-level collection, when examined at the item level. At the object level, the large-scale collections did not always receive less use than the traditional item-level collection. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to three different digital collections from one institution. Web analytics also represent a limited interpretation of “use.” Practical implications This study presents a method for other institutions to assess their own large-scale digitization efforts and contributes to the profession’s understanding of the impact of large-scale digitization. Originality/value This paper is unique because it uses Web analytics to compare the use of large-scale digital collections to the use of traditional boutique digital collections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A partnership between the library and the digital humanities scholars: interview with Plamen Miltenoff Identifying research fronts in NLP applications in library and information science using meta-analysis approaches Open access initiatives in European countries: analysis of trends and policies Cyber security in university libraries and implication for library and information science education in Nigeria The Cologne Public Library as accelerator of digitisation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1