测试两个以用户为中心的设计原则的界限:隐喻和记忆负荷

Misha W. Vaughan
{"title":"测试两个以用户为中心的设计原则的界限:隐喻和记忆负荷","authors":"Misha W. Vaughan","doi":"10.1207/s15327590ijhc1003_4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This experiment examined how varying implementations of two user-centered design principles affected the usability of a computer program. Drawing from human-computer interaction, as well as cognitive psychology, the following principles were implemented and tested: maximizing use of the user's expectations and stereotypes and minimizing the user's memory load. Nine interfaces were created using Hypercard' s datebook program. On each interface, the graphics and text were manipulated according to the design principle and the related cognitive psychology research. A total of 108 people participated. Of the five hypotheses, only one was supported by the data. The data suggest that for less complicated programs and tasks, strict adherence to design principles may not be required.","PeriodicalId":208962,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the Boundaries of Two User-Centered Design Principles: Metaphors and Memory Load\",\"authors\":\"Misha W. Vaughan\",\"doi\":\"10.1207/s15327590ijhc1003_4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This experiment examined how varying implementations of two user-centered design principles affected the usability of a computer program. Drawing from human-computer interaction, as well as cognitive psychology, the following principles were implemented and tested: maximizing use of the user's expectations and stereotypes and minimizing the user's memory load. Nine interfaces were created using Hypercard' s datebook program. On each interface, the graphics and text were manipulated according to the design principle and the related cognitive psychology research. A total of 108 people participated. Of the five hypotheses, only one was supported by the data. The data suggest that for less complicated programs and tasks, strict adherence to design principles may not be required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1003_4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327590ijhc1003_4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这个实验检验了两个以用户为中心的设计原则的不同实现是如何影响计算机程序的可用性的。根据人机交互以及认知心理学,我们实施并测试了以下原则:最大限度地利用用户的期望和刻板印象,最大限度地减少用户的记忆负荷。使用Hypercard的记事本程序创建了9个接口。在每个界面上,根据设计原则和相关的认知心理学研究对图形和文本进行操作。共有108人参与。在五个假设中,只有一个得到了数据的支持。数据表明,对于不太复杂的程序和任务,可能不需要严格遵守设计原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing the Boundaries of Two User-Centered Design Principles: Metaphors and Memory Load
This experiment examined how varying implementations of two user-centered design principles affected the usability of a computer program. Drawing from human-computer interaction, as well as cognitive psychology, the following principles were implemented and tested: maximizing use of the user's expectations and stereotypes and minimizing the user's memory load. Nine interfaces were created using Hypercard' s datebook program. On each interface, the graphics and text were manipulated according to the design principle and the related cognitive psychology research. A total of 108 people participated. Of the five hypotheses, only one was supported by the data. The data suggest that for less complicated programs and tasks, strict adherence to design principles may not be required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usability Inspection by Metaphors of Human Thinking Compared to Heuristic Evaluation Templates for Search Queries: A User-Centered Feature for Improving Web Search Tools A Corporate Style Guide That Includes Domain Knowledge Identification of an Acceptable Mixture of Key and Speech Inputs in Bimodal Interfaces Decision Support for Indexing and Retrieval of Information in Hypertext Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1