难缠的工人有与其他人接触的经验。实证调查所得

S. Bahlke
{"title":"难缠的工人有与其他人接触的经验。实证调查所得","authors":"S. Bahlke","doi":"10.1055/s-2001-15990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the public has been paying attention to the topics illness and disability with respect to public health, long-term care insurance and public old age insurance systems for years, the risk of becoming disabled at work has been considered less. Research in this area has for a long time been focused on questions regarding first-time entry and return to work of disabled persons into the regular labour market. Also, much policy research has tended to deny an active role of the enterprise as an independent player and creator of policy in the management of disability. Hence only little documentation of employers' programmes and strategies as well as analysis concerning the question of job retention is available. In order to cover the research deficit a study with regard to employment careers of severely disabled was conducted in Rhineland-Palatinate from 1997 to 1999. The study pursues two different paths: On the one hand living and working conditions of this group are analysed, on the other the study's purpose is to give an overview of employers' disability management practices from the severely disabled employees' point of view. This article deals with the results of the policies within the enterprise study. It concerns the analysis of the following issues: Does disability have a negative impact on the employees' careers? Which measures are preferred by the persons interviewed and why? The final question, whether the need for supporting measures ascertained may be satisfied by the existing instruments available under the German Severely Disabled Persons Act must be answered with a clear \"No\"! Employers and disabled employees need alternative measures of support.","PeriodicalId":423642,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Die","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Erfahrungen schwerbehinderter Arbeitnehmer mit betrieblichen Maßnahmen im Rahmen der Weiterbeschäftigung. Ausgewählte Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung\",\"authors\":\"S. Bahlke\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-2001-15990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the public has been paying attention to the topics illness and disability with respect to public health, long-term care insurance and public old age insurance systems for years, the risk of becoming disabled at work has been considered less. Research in this area has for a long time been focused on questions regarding first-time entry and return to work of disabled persons into the regular labour market. Also, much policy research has tended to deny an active role of the enterprise as an independent player and creator of policy in the management of disability. Hence only little documentation of employers' programmes and strategies as well as analysis concerning the question of job retention is available. In order to cover the research deficit a study with regard to employment careers of severely disabled was conducted in Rhineland-Palatinate from 1997 to 1999. The study pursues two different paths: On the one hand living and working conditions of this group are analysed, on the other the study's purpose is to give an overview of employers' disability management practices from the severely disabled employees' point of view. This article deals with the results of the policies within the enterprise study. It concerns the analysis of the following issues: Does disability have a negative impact on the employees' careers? Which measures are preferred by the persons interviewed and why? The final question, whether the need for supporting measures ascertained may be satisfied by the existing instruments available under the German Severely Disabled Persons Act must be answered with a clear \\\"No\\\"! Employers and disabled employees need alternative measures of support.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Die\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Die\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-15990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Die","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-15990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

虽然公众多年来一直关注与公共健康、长期护理保险和公共老年保险制度有关的疾病和残疾问题,但在工作中成为残疾的风险却很少被考虑。长期以来,这方面的研究一直集中在残疾人首次进入正规劳动力市场和重返工作岗位的问题上。此外,许多政策研究倾向于否认企业作为一个独立的参与者和政策创造者在残疾管理方面的积极作用。因此,关于雇主的方案和战略以及关于保留工作问题的分析的文件很少。为了弥补研究不足,1997年至1999年在莱茵兰-普法尔茨州进行了一项关于严重残疾人就业生涯的研究。本研究采取了两条不同的路径:一方面分析了这一群体的生活和工作条件,另一方面,研究的目的是从严重残疾员工的角度对雇主的残疾管理实践进行概述。本文讨论了企业内部政策研究的结果。它涉及以下问题的分析:残疾是否对员工的职业生涯产生负面影响?受访者更喜欢哪些措施?为什么?最后一个问题是,根据《德国严重残疾人法》现有的文书是否可以满足所确定的支助措施的需要,必须明确地回答“不”!雇主和残疾雇员需要其他支持措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Erfahrungen schwerbehinderter Arbeitnehmer mit betrieblichen Maßnahmen im Rahmen der Weiterbeschäftigung. Ausgewählte Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung
While the public has been paying attention to the topics illness and disability with respect to public health, long-term care insurance and public old age insurance systems for years, the risk of becoming disabled at work has been considered less. Research in this area has for a long time been focused on questions regarding first-time entry and return to work of disabled persons into the regular labour market. Also, much policy research has tended to deny an active role of the enterprise as an independent player and creator of policy in the management of disability. Hence only little documentation of employers' programmes and strategies as well as analysis concerning the question of job retention is available. In order to cover the research deficit a study with regard to employment careers of severely disabled was conducted in Rhineland-Palatinate from 1997 to 1999. The study pursues two different paths: On the one hand living and working conditions of this group are analysed, on the other the study's purpose is to give an overview of employers' disability management practices from the severely disabled employees' point of view. This article deals with the results of the policies within the enterprise study. It concerns the analysis of the following issues: Does disability have a negative impact on the employees' careers? Which measures are preferred by the persons interviewed and why? The final question, whether the need for supporting measures ascertained may be satisfied by the existing instruments available under the German Severely Disabled Persons Act must be answered with a clear "No"! Employers and disabled employees need alternative measures of support.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation von Kontextfaktoren in der psychosomatischen Rehabilitation Rehabilitation bei depressiven Störungen Mitteilungen „Die Rehabilitation“ Soziale Ungleichheit und Rehabilitation bei psychischen Erkrankungen Ein Verfahren zum Screening dreier Dimensionen arbeitsbezogener Verhaltens- und Erlebensmuster in der psychosomatischen Rehabilitation – Vorschlag für eine Kurzform AVEM-3D
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1