用人体工程学标准评估用户界面

Christian Bastien, D. Scapin
{"title":"用人体工程学标准评估用户界面","authors":"Christian Bastien, D. Scapin","doi":"10.1080/10447319509526114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The usefulness of a set of ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of user interfaces was assessed using a mixed two‐factors experimental design. Two groups of usability specialists (control, criteria) were asked to evaluate the interface of a musical database management system in two phases. In the first phase of the experiment, all the participants relied solely on their expertise; in the second phase they were instructed to evaluate the management system again but this time through the replay of their previous exploration: Participants in the criteria group used a set of ergonomic criteria whereas the participants in the control group did not. In the first phase, the two groups did not differ in terms of: (a) the number of usability problems detected, and (b) the proportions of usability problems uncovered as well as the proportion of usability problems found in common, with respect to the number of single evaluations (one by participant) that were computed into combined evaluations (i.e., aggregates). I...","PeriodicalId":208962,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"171","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating a user interface with ergonomic criteria\",\"authors\":\"Christian Bastien, D. Scapin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10447319509526114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The usefulness of a set of ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of user interfaces was assessed using a mixed two‐factors experimental design. Two groups of usability specialists (control, criteria) were asked to evaluate the interface of a musical database management system in two phases. In the first phase of the experiment, all the participants relied solely on their expertise; in the second phase they were instructed to evaluate the management system again but this time through the replay of their previous exploration: Participants in the criteria group used a set of ergonomic criteria whereas the participants in the control group did not. In the first phase, the two groups did not differ in terms of: (a) the number of usability problems detected, and (b) the proportions of usability problems uncovered as well as the proportion of usability problems found in common, with respect to the number of single evaluations (one by participant) that were computed into combined evaluations (i.e., aggregates). I...\",\"PeriodicalId\":208962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"171\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319509526114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319509526114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 171

摘要

使用混合双因素实验设计评估了一套用于评估用户界面的人体工程学标准的有效性。两组可用性专家(控制组和标准组)被要求分两个阶段评估一个音乐数据库管理系统的界面。在实验的第一阶段,所有的参与者完全依靠他们的专业知识;在第二阶段,他们被要求再次评估管理系统,但这一次是通过重复他们之前的探索:标准组的参与者使用了一套人体工程学标准,而对照组的参与者则没有。在第一阶段,两组在以下方面没有区别:(a)检测到的可用性问题的数量,(b)发现的可用性问题的比例以及发现的共同可用性问题的比例,相对于计算成组合评估的单个评估的数量(一个参与者)(即聚合)。我…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating a user interface with ergonomic criteria
The usefulness of a set of ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of user interfaces was assessed using a mixed two‐factors experimental design. Two groups of usability specialists (control, criteria) were asked to evaluate the interface of a musical database management system in two phases. In the first phase of the experiment, all the participants relied solely on their expertise; in the second phase they were instructed to evaluate the management system again but this time through the replay of their previous exploration: Participants in the criteria group used a set of ergonomic criteria whereas the participants in the control group did not. In the first phase, the two groups did not differ in terms of: (a) the number of usability problems detected, and (b) the proportions of usability problems uncovered as well as the proportion of usability problems found in common, with respect to the number of single evaluations (one by participant) that were computed into combined evaluations (i.e., aggregates). I...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usability Inspection by Metaphors of Human Thinking Compared to Heuristic Evaluation Templates for Search Queries: A User-Centered Feature for Improving Web Search Tools A Corporate Style Guide That Includes Domain Knowledge Identification of an Acceptable Mixture of Key and Speech Inputs in Bimodal Interfaces Decision Support for Indexing and Retrieval of Information in Hypertext Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1