家庭医生对过敏反应诊断和管理的准备和知识水平

M. Serbes, Sanem Nemmezi Karaca
{"title":"家庭医生对过敏反应诊断和管理的准备和知识水平","authors":"M. Serbes, Sanem Nemmezi Karaca","doi":"10.53424/balikesirsbd.1244214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Anaphylaxis is under-recognized and undertreated by physicians, indicating critical knowledge gaps. This study aimed to assess the knowledge levels of anaphylaxis among family physicians (FPs) as they are the primary first-line healthcare providers and identify the factors influencing their knowledge levels. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study using an internet-based Google Forms questionnaire was conducted among voluntary FPs in Sivas, Turkey. Demographic features, including age, years in practice, career position, and knowledge related to the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in children were assessed. Results: A total of 149 FPs participated in the survey (34 [24.3%] general practitioners [GPs], 20 [14.3%] contracted family physicians [CFPs], 74 [52.9%] residents in training [RITs], and 12 [8.6%] specialists). The number of participants who correctly answered all questions regarding diagnosis, acute treatment, and epinephrine auto-injector use was 11 (7.9%), 52 (37.4%), and 27 (19.3%), respectively. In diagnosing anaphylaxis, 100 (72.5%) participants were unaware that anaphylaxis can occur without skin manifestations, and only 48 (34.8%) identified gastrointestinal symptoms as a possible anaphylaxis presentation. RITs (11, 14.9%) and specialists (2, 16.7%) had better performance on the questionnaire, with higher proportions of participants who answered all questions correctly, compared to GPs (2, 5.9%) and CFPs (1, 5.0%). Attendance at an educational activity in the last year was the only independent factor associated with answering all questionnaire items correctly. Conclusion: There is a need to improve anaphylaxis recognition and management among all FPs regardless of their career position and work experience, underlining the importance of regular and updated educational interventions.","PeriodicalId":247163,"journal":{"name":"Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal","volume":"1021 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preparedness and Knowledge Level of Family Physicians Regarding Anaphylaxis Diagnosis and Management\",\"authors\":\"M. Serbes, Sanem Nemmezi Karaca\",\"doi\":\"10.53424/balikesirsbd.1244214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Anaphylaxis is under-recognized and undertreated by physicians, indicating critical knowledge gaps. This study aimed to assess the knowledge levels of anaphylaxis among family physicians (FPs) as they are the primary first-line healthcare providers and identify the factors influencing their knowledge levels. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study using an internet-based Google Forms questionnaire was conducted among voluntary FPs in Sivas, Turkey. Demographic features, including age, years in practice, career position, and knowledge related to the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in children were assessed. Results: A total of 149 FPs participated in the survey (34 [24.3%] general practitioners [GPs], 20 [14.3%] contracted family physicians [CFPs], 74 [52.9%] residents in training [RITs], and 12 [8.6%] specialists). The number of participants who correctly answered all questions regarding diagnosis, acute treatment, and epinephrine auto-injector use was 11 (7.9%), 52 (37.4%), and 27 (19.3%), respectively. In diagnosing anaphylaxis, 100 (72.5%) participants were unaware that anaphylaxis can occur without skin manifestations, and only 48 (34.8%) identified gastrointestinal symptoms as a possible anaphylaxis presentation. RITs (11, 14.9%) and specialists (2, 16.7%) had better performance on the questionnaire, with higher proportions of participants who answered all questions correctly, compared to GPs (2, 5.9%) and CFPs (1, 5.0%). Attendance at an educational activity in the last year was the only independent factor associated with answering all questionnaire items correctly. Conclusion: There is a need to improve anaphylaxis recognition and management among all FPs regardless of their career position and work experience, underlining the importance of regular and updated educational interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":247163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal\",\"volume\":\"1021 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1244214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Balıkesır Health Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53424/balikesirsbd.1244214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:医生对过敏反应的认识和治疗不足,表明存在严重的知识差距。本研究旨在评估家庭医生(FPs)作为主要的一线医疗保健提供者的过敏反应知识水平,并确定影响其知识水平的因素。材料和方法:在土耳其锡瓦斯的自愿FPs中进行了一项基于互联网的谷歌表格问卷调查。评估人口统计学特征,包括年龄、从业年限、职业职位以及与儿童过敏反应诊断和管理相关的知识。结果:共有149名住院医生参与调查,其中全科医生34人(24.3%)、签约家庭医生20人(14.3%)、住院医师74人(52.9%)、专科医生12人(8.6%)。正确回答有关诊断、急性治疗和肾上腺素自动注射器使用的所有问题的参与者人数分别为11人(7.9%)、52人(37.4%)和27人(19.3%)。在诊断过敏反应时,100名(72.5%)参与者没有意识到过敏反应可以在没有皮肤表现的情况下发生,只有48名(34.8%)参与者认为胃肠道症状可能是过敏反应的表现。rit(11,14.9%)和专家(2,16.7%)在问卷上的表现更好,与全科医生(2,5.9%)和CFPs(1,5.0%)相比,正确回答所有问题的参与者比例更高。在过去一年中参加教育活动是唯一与正确回答所有问卷项目相关的独立因素。结论:有必要改善所有FPs的过敏反应识别和管理,无论其职业地位和工作经验如何,强调定期和更新教育干预的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preparedness and Knowledge Level of Family Physicians Regarding Anaphylaxis Diagnosis and Management
Objective: Anaphylaxis is under-recognized and undertreated by physicians, indicating critical knowledge gaps. This study aimed to assess the knowledge levels of anaphylaxis among family physicians (FPs) as they are the primary first-line healthcare providers and identify the factors influencing their knowledge levels. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study using an internet-based Google Forms questionnaire was conducted among voluntary FPs in Sivas, Turkey. Demographic features, including age, years in practice, career position, and knowledge related to the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis in children were assessed. Results: A total of 149 FPs participated in the survey (34 [24.3%] general practitioners [GPs], 20 [14.3%] contracted family physicians [CFPs], 74 [52.9%] residents in training [RITs], and 12 [8.6%] specialists). The number of participants who correctly answered all questions regarding diagnosis, acute treatment, and epinephrine auto-injector use was 11 (7.9%), 52 (37.4%), and 27 (19.3%), respectively. In diagnosing anaphylaxis, 100 (72.5%) participants were unaware that anaphylaxis can occur without skin manifestations, and only 48 (34.8%) identified gastrointestinal symptoms as a possible anaphylaxis presentation. RITs (11, 14.9%) and specialists (2, 16.7%) had better performance on the questionnaire, with higher proportions of participants who answered all questions correctly, compared to GPs (2, 5.9%) and CFPs (1, 5.0%). Attendance at an educational activity in the last year was the only independent factor associated with answering all questionnaire items correctly. Conclusion: There is a need to improve anaphylaxis recognition and management among all FPs regardless of their career position and work experience, underlining the importance of regular and updated educational interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Level of Knowledge About Child Neglect and Abuse: A University Sample eNOS Expression in the Cerebellum of Dogs Naturally Infected with Canine Distemper Virus and Realationship with Apoptosis The Relationship of Lunar Cycles with Natal and Postnatal Processes in Newborn Infants Lactate/Albumin Ratio as a Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever The Relationship between Passive Smoking and Caries Experience in Children Aged 1-12 Years and Influencing Factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1