BEPS会让新西兰最终对谷歌征税吗?

Andrew M. C. Smith
{"title":"BEPS会让新西兰最终对谷歌征税吗?","authors":"Andrew M. C. Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3092781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tax avoidance by major US multinationals has been extremely topical over the last decade since the GFC. One of the MNEs at the forefront of this controversy is Google. It has been able to snare a dominant share of the international online advertising market without paying any significant amounts of tax in countries where it obtains orders other than the US. It has been able to do so by structuring its affairs so that it does not have a “permanent establishment” (PE) in New Zealand. Instead its New Zealand customers conclude contracts directly with Google subsidiaries in countries which New Zealand has concluded a DTA with but otherwise impose low taxes such as Singapore and Ireland. The BEPS project has been undertaken by the OECD to deal with MNE tax avoidance. New Zealand has been an active participant in this project seeing a multilateral forum such as the OECD as the best way to deal with this problem rather than taking independent steps of its own. The multilateral instrument (MLI) arising out of the BEPS project is designed to modify a large number of the world’s DTAs at one time to deal with this tax avoidance problem such PE avoidance by MNEs such as Google. The MLI is a modular convention in that signatory states do not have to agree to adopt all parts of it. This paper analyses the responses of several of New Zealand’s key DTA partners in respect of Part IV of the MLI dealing with PE avoidance. It will be concluded that the MLI is unlikely to prove effective for New Zealand in deal with tax avoidance by Google. It appears that New Zealand may need to adopt a unilateral strategy to effectively tax Google on its profits earned from New Zealand advertisers outside the BEPS project which is proposed in a bill introduced to the New Zealand Parliament in December 2017. Consideration is finally made whether this bill will be effective in securing tax revenue from MNEs such as Google.","PeriodicalId":385233,"journal":{"name":"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Will BEPS Allow New Zealand to Finally Tax Google?\",\"authors\":\"Andrew M. C. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3092781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tax avoidance by major US multinationals has been extremely topical over the last decade since the GFC. One of the MNEs at the forefront of this controversy is Google. It has been able to snare a dominant share of the international online advertising market without paying any significant amounts of tax in countries where it obtains orders other than the US. It has been able to do so by structuring its affairs so that it does not have a “permanent establishment” (PE) in New Zealand. Instead its New Zealand customers conclude contracts directly with Google subsidiaries in countries which New Zealand has concluded a DTA with but otherwise impose low taxes such as Singapore and Ireland. The BEPS project has been undertaken by the OECD to deal with MNE tax avoidance. New Zealand has been an active participant in this project seeing a multilateral forum such as the OECD as the best way to deal with this problem rather than taking independent steps of its own. The multilateral instrument (MLI) arising out of the BEPS project is designed to modify a large number of the world’s DTAs at one time to deal with this tax avoidance problem such PE avoidance by MNEs such as Google. The MLI is a modular convention in that signatory states do not have to agree to adopt all parts of it. This paper analyses the responses of several of New Zealand’s key DTA partners in respect of Part IV of the MLI dealing with PE avoidance. It will be concluded that the MLI is unlikely to prove effective for New Zealand in deal with tax avoidance by Google. It appears that New Zealand may need to adopt a unilateral strategy to effectively tax Google on its profits earned from New Zealand advertisers outside the BEPS project which is proposed in a bill introduced to the New Zealand Parliament in December 2017. Consideration is finally made whether this bill will be effective in securing tax revenue from MNEs such as Google.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3092781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEN: Differences in Taxation & Corporate Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3092781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自全球金融危机爆发以来的过去10年里,美国大型跨国公司的避税问题一直是热门话题。处于这场争论前沿的跨国公司之一是谷歌。阿里巴巴能够在国际在线广告市场占据主导地位,而无需在除美国以外的其他国家支付大笔税款。它之所以能够做到这一点,是因为它的事务结构使它在新西兰没有“常设机构”(PE)。相反,它的新西兰客户直接与谷歌在新加坡和爱尔兰等国的子公司签订合同,这些国家与新西兰签订了DTA,但征收较低的税收。BEPS项目由经合组织负责处理跨国公司避税问题。新西兰一直是这一项目的积极参与者,认为经合发组织这样的多边论坛是处理这一问题的最佳途径,而不是采取自己的独立步骤。BEPS项目产生的多边工具(MLI)旨在一次修改世界上大量的dta,以处理这种避税问题,例如谷歌等跨国公司的PE避税。《公约》是一项模块化公约,签署国不必同意采用公约的所有部分。本文分析了新西兰几个主要的DTA合作伙伴对MLI第四部分关于PE规避的回应。它将得出结论,在处理谷歌的避税问题时,MLI不太可能对新西兰有效。似乎新西兰可能需要采取单方面的策略,对谷歌从BEPS项目以外的新西兰广告商那里获得的利润进行有效征税,这是2017年12月提交新西兰议会的一项法案中提出的。该法案是否能有效确保谷歌等跨国企业的税收,是最终考虑的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Will BEPS Allow New Zealand to Finally Tax Google?
Tax avoidance by major US multinationals has been extremely topical over the last decade since the GFC. One of the MNEs at the forefront of this controversy is Google. It has been able to snare a dominant share of the international online advertising market without paying any significant amounts of tax in countries where it obtains orders other than the US. It has been able to do so by structuring its affairs so that it does not have a “permanent establishment” (PE) in New Zealand. Instead its New Zealand customers conclude contracts directly with Google subsidiaries in countries which New Zealand has concluded a DTA with but otherwise impose low taxes such as Singapore and Ireland. The BEPS project has been undertaken by the OECD to deal with MNE tax avoidance. New Zealand has been an active participant in this project seeing a multilateral forum such as the OECD as the best way to deal with this problem rather than taking independent steps of its own. The multilateral instrument (MLI) arising out of the BEPS project is designed to modify a large number of the world’s DTAs at one time to deal with this tax avoidance problem such PE avoidance by MNEs such as Google. The MLI is a modular convention in that signatory states do not have to agree to adopt all parts of it. This paper analyses the responses of several of New Zealand’s key DTA partners in respect of Part IV of the MLI dealing with PE avoidance. It will be concluded that the MLI is unlikely to prove effective for New Zealand in deal with tax avoidance by Google. It appears that New Zealand may need to adopt a unilateral strategy to effectively tax Google on its profits earned from New Zealand advertisers outside the BEPS project which is proposed in a bill introduced to the New Zealand Parliament in December 2017. Consideration is finally made whether this bill will be effective in securing tax revenue from MNEs such as Google.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Re-Allocating Taxing Rights and Minimum Tax Rates in International Profit Taxation A Re-examination of Firm Size and Taxes Output, Employment, and Price Effects of U.S. Narrative Tax Changes: A Factor-Augmented Vector Autoregression Approach Tax Policy Expectations and Firm Behavior: Evidence from the 2016 U.S. Election and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Fair Corporate Taxation: Why and How International Tax Rules Need to Be Changed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1