堤状体磁异常深度估计的百分比误差比较

F. Al-Rawi, S. J. D. Shejiri
{"title":"堤状体磁异常深度估计的百分比误差比较","authors":"F. Al-Rawi, S. J. D. Shejiri","doi":"10.59746/jfes.v1i1.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Percentage errors in depth estimation from magnetic anomalies due to dyke-like bodies, having various depths and inclination angles, are calculated. Two methods have been used to estimate the depth of these bodies and then their percentage errors in depth estimation are compared. These methods are the well-known slope-half slope method and the method adopting procedure through using Fraser filter. The two methods have accompanied various percent errors in depth estimation for models having various magnetic parameters. The comparison between the calculated error values obtained from the two methods show that the differences between the maximum and minimum percent error with various inclination angles and depths are smaller for depths estimated by using Fraser filter procedure. Such results highlight the lesser mistakes that can be achieved if the procedure of depth estimation using Fraser filter is considered and in addition, the ease of the application of this procedure compared with slope method.","PeriodicalId":433821,"journal":{"name":"Jornual of AL-Farabi for Engineering Sciences","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Percentage Error in Depth Estimation of Magnetic Anomalies Due Dyke-like Bodies\",\"authors\":\"F. Al-Rawi, S. J. D. Shejiri\",\"doi\":\"10.59746/jfes.v1i1.51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Percentage errors in depth estimation from magnetic anomalies due to dyke-like bodies, having various depths and inclination angles, are calculated. Two methods have been used to estimate the depth of these bodies and then their percentage errors in depth estimation are compared. These methods are the well-known slope-half slope method and the method adopting procedure through using Fraser filter. The two methods have accompanied various percent errors in depth estimation for models having various magnetic parameters. The comparison between the calculated error values obtained from the two methods show that the differences between the maximum and minimum percent error with various inclination angles and depths are smaller for depths estimated by using Fraser filter procedure. Such results highlight the lesser mistakes that can be achieved if the procedure of depth estimation using Fraser filter is considered and in addition, the ease of the application of this procedure compared with slope method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornual of AL-Farabi for Engineering Sciences\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornual of AL-Farabi for Engineering Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59746/jfes.v1i1.51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornual of AL-Farabi for Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59746/jfes.v1i1.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

计算了具有不同深度和倾角的堤状体磁异常在深度估计中的百分比误差。用两种方法估计了这些体的深度,并比较了它们在深度估计中的百分比误差。这两种方法分别是著名的斜率-半斜率法和采用菲沙滤波的方法。对于具有不同磁参数的模型,这两种方法在深度估计中存在不同百分比的误差。两种方法计算误差值的比较表明,采用Fraser滤波方法估计的深度随倾角和深度的变化,最大和最小误差百分比的差异较小。这些结果突出表明,如果考虑使用Fraser滤波器的深度估计过程,可以实现较小的错误,此外,与斜率法相比,该过程易于应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Percentage Error in Depth Estimation of Magnetic Anomalies Due Dyke-like Bodies
The Percentage errors in depth estimation from magnetic anomalies due to dyke-like bodies, having various depths and inclination angles, are calculated. Two methods have been used to estimate the depth of these bodies and then their percentage errors in depth estimation are compared. These methods are the well-known slope-half slope method and the method adopting procedure through using Fraser filter. The two methods have accompanied various percent errors in depth estimation for models having various magnetic parameters. The comparison between the calculated error values obtained from the two methods show that the differences between the maximum and minimum percent error with various inclination angles and depths are smaller for depths estimated by using Fraser filter procedure. Such results highlight the lesser mistakes that can be achieved if the procedure of depth estimation using Fraser filter is considered and in addition, the ease of the application of this procedure compared with slope method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Review Report of Present Trend in Peristaltic Activity of MHD NON-Newtonian and Newtonian Fluids Wettability Evaluation by Spontaneous Imbibition Measurement A review of Indoor Positioning Techniques Comparative analysis of routing protocols for wireless area networks and evaluation of the effectiveness Streaming the Video Presentation Slides based on Frame Distance Technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1