自然工作:女性社区罪犯重新融入社会的机会?

Julie Taylor, I. Convery, Emma Barton
{"title":"自然工作:女性社区罪犯重新融入社会的机会?","authors":"Julie Taylor, I. Convery, Emma Barton","doi":"10.18552/APRJ.V1I1.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective : To explore connectedness to the natural and social worlds across three female-only groups, offenders, non-offenders and nature lovers. Design: A mixed methods questionnaire survey design exploring the extent to which group members differed on self rated social and natural connectedness was employed. The constructs of connectedness to nature and social connectedness were predicted to correlate. Methods: 630 participants completed a four part survey. The survey included demographic details, a nature connectedness scale, a social connectedness scale and a qualitative question asking participants to reflect on how they felt when in nature. Results: Analysis revealed significant differences between the groups in terms of their self rated connectedness to nature and to the social world. Nature lovers were found to be more connected to both the natural and social worlds than either of the other two groups. Offenders were found to be less connected to both the natural and social worlds than either of the other two groups. A correlational analysis revealed a positive correlation between connectedness to nature and social connectedness suggesting that the stronger an individual’s connectedness to nature, the stronger their connection to the social world. Conclusions: The findings were discussed in the context of social connectedness theory. Future applications of the findings to work with female offenders were also mooted. Future research exploring the possibility that the ability to connect is mediated by levels of physiological arousal and anxiety has been proposed.","PeriodicalId":201507,"journal":{"name":"applied psychological research journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work in nature: An opportunity for social reconnection for female community sentenced offenders?\",\"authors\":\"Julie Taylor, I. Convery, Emma Barton\",\"doi\":\"10.18552/APRJ.V1I1.122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective : To explore connectedness to the natural and social worlds across three female-only groups, offenders, non-offenders and nature lovers. Design: A mixed methods questionnaire survey design exploring the extent to which group members differed on self rated social and natural connectedness was employed. The constructs of connectedness to nature and social connectedness were predicted to correlate. Methods: 630 participants completed a four part survey. The survey included demographic details, a nature connectedness scale, a social connectedness scale and a qualitative question asking participants to reflect on how they felt when in nature. Results: Analysis revealed significant differences between the groups in terms of their self rated connectedness to nature and to the social world. Nature lovers were found to be more connected to both the natural and social worlds than either of the other two groups. Offenders were found to be less connected to both the natural and social worlds than either of the other two groups. A correlational analysis revealed a positive correlation between connectedness to nature and social connectedness suggesting that the stronger an individual’s connectedness to nature, the stronger their connection to the social world. Conclusions: The findings were discussed in the context of social connectedness theory. Future applications of the findings to work with female offenders were also mooted. Future research exploring the possibility that the ability to connect is mediated by levels of physiological arousal and anxiety has been proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"applied psychological research journal\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"applied psychological research journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18552/APRJ.V1I1.122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"applied psychological research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18552/APRJ.V1I1.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:探讨女性罪犯、非罪犯和自然爱好者与自然和社会世界的联系。设计:采用混合方法问卷调查设计,探讨小组成员在自评社会联系和自然联系方面的差异程度。自然连通性和社会连通性的构念被预测为相关的。方法:630名参与者完成四部分调查。该调查包括人口统计细节、自然连通性量表、社会连通性量表和一个定性问题,该问题要求参与者反映他们在大自然中的感受。结果:分析显示,两组人在自我评价与自然和社会世界的联系方面存在显著差异。研究发现,与其他两组相比,热爱自然的人与自然世界和社会世界的联系更紧密。研究发现,与其他两组相比,罪犯与自然世界和社会世界的联系更少。一项相关分析显示,与自然的联系与社会联系之间存在正相关关系,这表明一个人与自然的联系越紧密,他们与社会世界的联系就越紧密。结论:研究结果在社会联系理论的背景下进行了讨论。研究人员还讨论了未来将研究结果应用于女性罪犯的问题。未来的研究将探索连接能力是由生理唤醒和焦虑水平介导的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Work in nature: An opportunity for social reconnection for female community sentenced offenders?
Abstract Objective : To explore connectedness to the natural and social worlds across three female-only groups, offenders, non-offenders and nature lovers. Design: A mixed methods questionnaire survey design exploring the extent to which group members differed on self rated social and natural connectedness was employed. The constructs of connectedness to nature and social connectedness were predicted to correlate. Methods: 630 participants completed a four part survey. The survey included demographic details, a nature connectedness scale, a social connectedness scale and a qualitative question asking participants to reflect on how they felt when in nature. Results: Analysis revealed significant differences between the groups in terms of their self rated connectedness to nature and to the social world. Nature lovers were found to be more connected to both the natural and social worlds than either of the other two groups. Offenders were found to be less connected to both the natural and social worlds than either of the other two groups. A correlational analysis revealed a positive correlation between connectedness to nature and social connectedness suggesting that the stronger an individual’s connectedness to nature, the stronger their connection to the social world. Conclusions: The findings were discussed in the context of social connectedness theory. Future applications of the findings to work with female offenders were also mooted. Future research exploring the possibility that the ability to connect is mediated by levels of physiological arousal and anxiety has been proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effects of knowledge and word type on second language vocabulary learning: An exploratory study Do context and emotional reaction to physical dating violence interact to increase the likelihood of disclosure in 13 year-old British adolescents? Stress and Coping in IAPT Staff: a Mixed Methods Study Applying family life-cycle concepts in psychological practice with children and young people A different thing altogether: an idiographic case study of breast cancer in men using interpretative phenomenological analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1