网络安全中的人为因素:系统文献综述

Rohani Rohan, Suree Funilkul, Debajyoti Pal, W. Chutimaskul
{"title":"网络安全中的人为因素:系统文献综述","authors":"Rohani Rohan, Suree Funilkul, Debajyoti Pal, W. Chutimaskul","doi":"10.1109/ComPE53109.2021.9752358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cybersecurity is paramount for all public and private sectors for protecting their information systems, data, and digital assets from cyber-attacks; thus, relying on technology-based protections alone will not achieve this goal. This work examines the role of human factors in cybersecurity by looking at the top-tier conference on Human Factors in Cybersecurity over the past 6 years. A total of 24 articles were selected for the final analysis. Findings show that most of the authors used a quantitative method, where survey was the most used tool for collecting the data, and less attention has been paid to the theoretical research. Besides, three types of users were identified: university-level users, organizational-level users, and unspecified users. Culture is another less investigated aspect, and the samples were biased towards the western community. Moreover, 17 human factors are identified; human awareness, privacy perception, trust perception, behavior, and capability are the top five among them. Also, new insights and recommendations are presented.","PeriodicalId":211704,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding of Human Factors in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"Rohani Rohan, Suree Funilkul, Debajyoti Pal, W. Chutimaskul\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ComPE53109.2021.9752358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cybersecurity is paramount for all public and private sectors for protecting their information systems, data, and digital assets from cyber-attacks; thus, relying on technology-based protections alone will not achieve this goal. This work examines the role of human factors in cybersecurity by looking at the top-tier conference on Human Factors in Cybersecurity over the past 6 years. A total of 24 articles were selected for the final analysis. Findings show that most of the authors used a quantitative method, where survey was the most used tool for collecting the data, and less attention has been paid to the theoretical research. Besides, three types of users were identified: university-level users, organizational-level users, and unspecified users. Culture is another less investigated aspect, and the samples were biased towards the western community. Moreover, 17 human factors are identified; human awareness, privacy perception, trust perception, behavior, and capability are the top five among them. Also, new insights and recommendations are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ComPE53109.2021.9752358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Computational Performance Evaluation (ComPE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ComPE53109.2021.9752358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

网络安全对于所有公共和私营部门保护其信息系统、数据和数字资产免受网络攻击至关重要;因此,仅依靠基于技术的保护将无法实现这一目标。本研究通过回顾过去6年网络安全中的人为因素顶级会议,考察了人为因素在网络安全中的作用。最终选取了24篇文章进行分析。研究结果表明,大多数作者采用定量方法,调查是收集数据的最常用工具,对理论研究的关注较少。此外,还确定了三种类型的用户:校级用户、组织级用户和未指定用户。文化是另一个较少调查的方面,样本偏向于西方社区。此外,还确定了17个人为因素;其中,人的意识、隐私感知、信任感知、行为和能力排在前五位。此外,还提出了新的见解和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding of Human Factors in Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Review
Cybersecurity is paramount for all public and private sectors for protecting their information systems, data, and digital assets from cyber-attacks; thus, relying on technology-based protections alone will not achieve this goal. This work examines the role of human factors in cybersecurity by looking at the top-tier conference on Human Factors in Cybersecurity over the past 6 years. A total of 24 articles were selected for the final analysis. Findings show that most of the authors used a quantitative method, where survey was the most used tool for collecting the data, and less attention has been paid to the theoretical research. Besides, three types of users were identified: university-level users, organizational-level users, and unspecified users. Culture is another less investigated aspect, and the samples were biased towards the western community. Moreover, 17 human factors are identified; human awareness, privacy perception, trust perception, behavior, and capability are the top five among them. Also, new insights and recommendations are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
iSIMP with Integrity Validation using MD5 Hash A Fault Detection Scheme for IoT-enabled WSNs YOLOv3 based Real Time Social Distance Violation Detection in Public Places Finite Element Analysis of Femur Bone under Different Loading Conditions An Efficient and Anonymous Authentication Key Agreement Protocol for Smart Transportation System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1