对话中话语标记的自动识别:以相似为例

S. Zufferey, Andrei Popescu-Belis
{"title":"对话中话语标记的自动识别:以相似为例","authors":"S. Zufferey, Andrei Popescu-Belis","doi":"10.7892/BORIS.78686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the detection of discourse \n markers (DM) in dialog transcriptions, \nby human annotators and by automated \nmeans. After a theoretical discussion of the \ndefinition of DMs and their relevance to natural \n language processing, we focus on the role \nof like as a DM. Results from experiments \nwith human annotators show that detection of \nDMs is a difficult but reliable task, which requires \n prosodic information from soundtracks. \nThen, several types of features are defined for \nautomatic disambiguation of like: collocations, \n part-of-speech tags and duration-based \nfeatures. Decision-tree learning shows that for \nlike, nearly 70% precision can be reached, \nwith near 100% recall, mainly using collocation \n filters. Similar results hold for well, with \nabout 91% precision at 100% recall.","PeriodicalId":426429,"journal":{"name":"SIGDIAL Workshop","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Automatic Identification of Discourse Markers in Dialogs: The Case of Like\",\"authors\":\"S. Zufferey, Andrei Popescu-Belis\",\"doi\":\"10.7892/BORIS.78686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the detection of discourse \\n markers (DM) in dialog transcriptions, \\nby human annotators and by automated \\nmeans. After a theoretical discussion of the \\ndefinition of DMs and their relevance to natural \\n language processing, we focus on the role \\nof like as a DM. Results from experiments \\nwith human annotators show that detection of \\nDMs is a difficult but reliable task, which requires \\n prosodic information from soundtracks. \\nThen, several types of features are defined for \\nautomatic disambiguation of like: collocations, \\n part-of-speech tags and duration-based \\nfeatures. Decision-tree learning shows that for \\nlike, nearly 70% precision can be reached, \\nwith near 100% recall, mainly using collocation \\n filters. Similar results hold for well, with \\nabout 91% precision at 100% recall.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGDIAL Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7892/BORIS.78686\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGDIAL Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7892/BORIS.78686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

本文讨论了对话文本中话语标记(DM)的检测方法,包括人工注释器和自动化方法。在对DM的定义及其与自然语言处理的相关性进行了理论讨论之后,我们将重点放在like作为DM的作用上。人类注释器的实验结果表明,检测DM是一项困难但可靠的任务,这需要来自音轨的韵律信息。然后,定义了几种类型的自动消歧特征:搭配、词性标签和基于持续时间的特征。决策树学习表明,对于like,主要使用搭配过滤器,准确率接近70%,召回率接近100%。类似的结果也很好,在100%召回率下,准确率约为91%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards Automatic Identification of Discourse Markers in Dialogs: The Case of Like
This article discusses the detection of discourse markers (DM) in dialog transcriptions, by human annotators and by automated means. After a theoretical discussion of the definition of DMs and their relevance to natural language processing, we focus on the role of like as a DM. Results from experiments with human annotators show that detection of DMs is a difficult but reliable task, which requires prosodic information from soundtracks. Then, several types of features are defined for automatic disambiguation of like: collocations, part-of-speech tags and duration-based features. Decision-tree learning shows that for like, nearly 70% precision can be reached, with near 100% recall, mainly using collocation filters. Similar results hold for well, with about 91% precision at 100% recall.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Information State-Based Dialogue Manager for Call for Fire Dialogues A computational model of multi-modal grounding for human robot interaction Classification of Discourse Coherence Relations: An Exploratory Study using Multiple Knowledge Sources Balancing Conflicting Factors in Argument Interpretation Semantic and Pragmatic Presupposition in Discourse Representation Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1