{"title":"澳大利亚皇家空军采办项目的R&M保证","authors":"K. M. Bayley, P.P. Tabbagh","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1995.513233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the techniques used to assure system reliability and maintainability (R&M) within the acquisition process of the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). The RAAF recognizes that R&M are principal determinants of the level of operational availability that will be achieved by weapon systems and key factors of life cycle cost. R&M are therefore important performance parameters relevant in the acquisition process. To ensure clarity, the RAAF acquisition process is explained and contrasted with the US process. R&M is assured in RAAF weapon system acquisition programs in the following manner: (1) the R&M requirements are developed in a logical manner from operational preparedness objectives for the weapon system; (2) R&M requirements are quantitatively specified; (3) competing tenderers for the weapon system development propose and submit self devised R&M program plans to achieve the R&M performance requirements; (4) prospective contractor proposals are reviewed and compared using the Reliability Guide; (5) the successful tenderer assumes the commercial risk of achieving all of the system performance requirements including R&M; and (6) monitoring of the contractor during system development is \"hands-off\" but \"eyes open\". This approach to R&M in acquisition was chosen after consideration of the acquisition process in a number of countries, especially the US and UK. The approach is similar to that used by the UK and has been in use in Australia now for about two years.","PeriodicalId":143102,"journal":{"name":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The assurance of R&M in acquisition programs of the Royal Australian Air Force\",\"authors\":\"K. M. Bayley, P.P. Tabbagh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS.1995.513233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses the techniques used to assure system reliability and maintainability (R&M) within the acquisition process of the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). The RAAF recognizes that R&M are principal determinants of the level of operational availability that will be achieved by weapon systems and key factors of life cycle cost. R&M are therefore important performance parameters relevant in the acquisition process. To ensure clarity, the RAAF acquisition process is explained and contrasted with the US process. R&M is assured in RAAF weapon system acquisition programs in the following manner: (1) the R&M requirements are developed in a logical manner from operational preparedness objectives for the weapon system; (2) R&M requirements are quantitatively specified; (3) competing tenderers for the weapon system development propose and submit self devised R&M program plans to achieve the R&M performance requirements; (4) prospective contractor proposals are reviewed and compared using the Reliability Guide; (5) the successful tenderer assumes the commercial risk of achieving all of the system performance requirements including R&M; and (6) monitoring of the contractor during system development is \\\"hands-off\\\" but \\\"eyes open\\\". This approach to R&M in acquisition was chosen after consideration of the acquisition process in a number of countries, especially the US and UK. The approach is similar to that used by the UK and has been in use in Australia now for about two years.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1995.513233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1995 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1995.513233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The assurance of R&M in acquisition programs of the Royal Australian Air Force
This paper addresses the techniques used to assure system reliability and maintainability (R&M) within the acquisition process of the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF). The RAAF recognizes that R&M are principal determinants of the level of operational availability that will be achieved by weapon systems and key factors of life cycle cost. R&M are therefore important performance parameters relevant in the acquisition process. To ensure clarity, the RAAF acquisition process is explained and contrasted with the US process. R&M is assured in RAAF weapon system acquisition programs in the following manner: (1) the R&M requirements are developed in a logical manner from operational preparedness objectives for the weapon system; (2) R&M requirements are quantitatively specified; (3) competing tenderers for the weapon system development propose and submit self devised R&M program plans to achieve the R&M performance requirements; (4) prospective contractor proposals are reviewed and compared using the Reliability Guide; (5) the successful tenderer assumes the commercial risk of achieving all of the system performance requirements including R&M; and (6) monitoring of the contractor during system development is "hands-off" but "eyes open". This approach to R&M in acquisition was chosen after consideration of the acquisition process in a number of countries, especially the US and UK. The approach is similar to that used by the UK and has been in use in Australia now for about two years.