HMM单站点测试:我们可以用HMM文档重现组件故障级别吗?

2016 38th Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium (EOS/ESD) Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI:10.1109/EOSESD.2016.7592539

M. Scholz, R. Ashton, T. Smedes, R. Derikx, M. Dekker, J. Barth

{"title":"HMM单站点测试:我们可以用HMM文档重现组件故障级别吗?","authors":"M. Scholz, R. Ashton, T. Smedes, R. Derikx, M. Dekker, J. Barth","doi":"10.1109/EOSESD.2016.7592539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ESDA working group 5.6 has conducted single site testing to evaluate the repeatability of passfail results when using the setups in the standard practice 5.6 document. A ten times lower standard deviation is obtained in comparison to the 2011 round robin.","PeriodicalId":239756,"journal":{"name":"2016 38th Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium (EOS/ESD)","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HMM single site testing: Can we reproduce component failure level with the HMM document?\",\"authors\":\"M. Scholz, R. Ashton, T. Smedes, R. Derikx, M. Dekker, J. Barth\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EOSESD.2016.7592539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ESDA working group 5.6 has conducted single site testing to evaluate the repeatability of passfail results when using the setups in the standard practice 5.6 document. A ten times lower standard deviation is obtained in comparison to the 2011 round robin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 38th Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium (EOS/ESD)\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 38th Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium (EOS/ESD)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EOSESD.2016.7592539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 38th Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium (EOS/ESD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EOSESD.2016.7592539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

ESDA工作组5.6已经进行了单站点测试，以评估在使用标准实践5.6文档中的设置时通过失败结果的可重复性。与2011年的循环赛相比，标准差降低了10倍。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

HMM single site testing: Can we reproduce component failure level with the HMM document?

The ESDA working group 5.6 has conducted single site testing to evaluate the repeatability of passfail results when using the setups in the standard practice 5.6 document. A ten times lower standard deviation is obtained in comparison to the 2011 round robin.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2016 38th Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium (EOS/ESD)

自引率

0.00%

发文量