杂务竞争均衡:组合算法和硬度

B. Chaudhury, J. Garg, Patricia C. McGlaughlin, R. Mehta
{"title":"杂务竞争均衡:组合算法和硬度","authors":"B. Chaudhury, J. Garg, Patricia C. McGlaughlin, R. Mehta","doi":"10.1145/3490486.3538255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the computational complexity of finding a competitive equilibrium (CE) with chores when agents have linear preferences. CE is one of the most preferred mechanisms for allocating a set of items among agents. CE with equal incomes (CEEI), Fisher, and Arrow-Debreu (exchange) are the fundamental economic models to study allocation problems, where CEEI is a special case of Fisher and Fisher is a special case of exchange. When the items are goods (giv-ing utility), the CE set is convex even in the exchange model, facilitating several combinatorial polynomial-time algorithms (starting with the seminal work of Devanur, Papadimitriou, Saberi and Vazirani [DPSV08]) for all of these models. In sharp contrast, when the items are chores (giving disutility), the CE set is known to be non-convex and disconnected even in the CEEI model. Further, no combinatorial algorithms or hardness results are known for these models. In this paper, we give two main results for CE with chores: To the best of our knowledge, these results show the first separation between the CEEI and exchange models when agents have linear preferences, assuming PPAD (cid:54) = P. Furthermore, this is also the first separation between the two economic models when the CE set is non-convex in both cases. Finally, we show that our new insight implies a straightforward proof of the existence of an allocation that is both envy-free up to one chore (EF1) and Pareto optimal (PO) in the when have factored bivalued preferences. EPS22] involved","PeriodicalId":209859,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competitive Equilibrium with Chores: Combinatorial Algorithm and Hardness\",\"authors\":\"B. Chaudhury, J. Garg, Patricia C. McGlaughlin, R. Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3490486.3538255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the computational complexity of finding a competitive equilibrium (CE) with chores when agents have linear preferences. CE is one of the most preferred mechanisms for allocating a set of items among agents. CE with equal incomes (CEEI), Fisher, and Arrow-Debreu (exchange) are the fundamental economic models to study allocation problems, where CEEI is a special case of Fisher and Fisher is a special case of exchange. When the items are goods (giv-ing utility), the CE set is convex even in the exchange model, facilitating several combinatorial polynomial-time algorithms (starting with the seminal work of Devanur, Papadimitriou, Saberi and Vazirani [DPSV08]) for all of these models. In sharp contrast, when the items are chores (giving disutility), the CE set is known to be non-convex and disconnected even in the CEEI model. Further, no combinatorial algorithms or hardness results are known for these models. In this paper, we give two main results for CE with chores: To the best of our knowledge, these results show the first separation between the CEEI and exchange models when agents have linear preferences, assuming PPAD (cid:54) = P. Furthermore, this is also the first separation between the two economic models when the CE set is non-convex in both cases. Finally, we show that our new insight implies a straightforward proof of the existence of an allocation that is both envy-free up to one chore (EF1) and Pareto optimal (PO) in the when have factored bivalued preferences. EPS22] involved\",\"PeriodicalId\":209859,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3490486.3538255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3490486.3538255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我们研究了当主体具有线性偏好时,寻找具有杂务的竞争均衡(CE)的计算复杂度。CE是在代理之间分配一组项目的最受欢迎的机制之一。等收入CE (CEEI)、Fisher和Arrow-Debreu(交换)是研究分配问题的基本经济模型,其中CEEI是Fisher的特例,Fisher是交换的特例。当物品是商品(给予效用)时,即使在交换模型中,CE集也是凸的,这为所有这些模型提供了几种组合多项式时间算法(从Devanur, Papadimitriou, Saberi和Vazirani [DPSV08]的开创性工作开始)。与此形成鲜明对比的是,当项目是杂事(给出负效用)时,即使在CEEI模型中,CE集也是已知的非凸和断开的。此外,这些模型没有已知的组合算法或硬度结果。在本文中,我们给出了带有任务的CE的两个主要结果:据我们所知,这些结果表明,当代理具有线性偏好时,假设PPAD (cid:54) = p, CEEI和交换模型之间的第一次分离,此外,这也是两个经济模型之间的第一次分离,当CE集在两种情况下都是非凸的。最后,我们表明,我们的新见解暗示了一个直接的证据,即存在一种分配,当考虑了双值偏好时,它既不存在嫉妒,也不存在一项家务(EF1)和帕累托最优(PO)。涉及EPS22]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Competitive Equilibrium with Chores: Combinatorial Algorithm and Hardness
We study the computational complexity of finding a competitive equilibrium (CE) with chores when agents have linear preferences. CE is one of the most preferred mechanisms for allocating a set of items among agents. CE with equal incomes (CEEI), Fisher, and Arrow-Debreu (exchange) are the fundamental economic models to study allocation problems, where CEEI is a special case of Fisher and Fisher is a special case of exchange. When the items are goods (giv-ing utility), the CE set is convex even in the exchange model, facilitating several combinatorial polynomial-time algorithms (starting with the seminal work of Devanur, Papadimitriou, Saberi and Vazirani [DPSV08]) for all of these models. In sharp contrast, when the items are chores (giving disutility), the CE set is known to be non-convex and disconnected even in the CEEI model. Further, no combinatorial algorithms or hardness results are known for these models. In this paper, we give two main results for CE with chores: To the best of our knowledge, these results show the first separation between the CEEI and exchange models when agents have linear preferences, assuming PPAD (cid:54) = P. Furthermore, this is also the first separation between the two economic models when the CE set is non-convex in both cases. Finally, we show that our new insight implies a straightforward proof of the existence of an allocation that is both envy-free up to one chore (EF1) and Pareto optimal (PO) in the when have factored bivalued preferences. EPS22] involved
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Two-sided Matching in Infinite Markets Herd Design Efficient Capacity Provisioning for Firms with Multiple Locations: The Case of the Public Cloud Tight Incentive Analysis on Sybil Attacks to Market Equilibrium of Resource Exchange over General Networks General Graphs are Easier than Bipartite Graphs: Tight Bounds for Secretary Matching
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1