运筹学/管理科学体系分析:来自英国小型学术团体的见解

M. Kunc
{"title":"运筹学/管理科学体系分析:来自英国小型学术团体的见解","authors":"M. Kunc","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2805103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The OR/MS system has multiple actors located in diverse communities: industry (end users), consulting and academia (education research). The main flows between communities in the system are based on the exchange of problems for solutions using diverse knowledge stocks (e.g. mathematics, statistics, systems thinking) as well as the movement of graduates. However, there are disagreements on the views about the OR/MS system as well as issues that have affected the OR/MS field in recent years reducing its relative stance within the rest of disciplines, students and managers. This paper proposes a framework based on a set of activities within OR/MS communities and offer a set of multidimensional measures that can be employed to evaluate the communities over time providing additional evidence for the discussion about the development of OR/MS. Five OR communities located in five universities in the United Kingdom are employed to explore the state of the OR communities using the framework. The results confirm the existence of a broad spectrum and applicability of research in diverse fields but the broad spectrum is somehow diluted among subject areas and not captured by traditional OR perspectives. The findings show a declining position in business schools, dispersion of practitioners and OR graduates, who are not linked to OR communities. Professional societies may need to find synergies with other societies in close subject areas. OR communities attempt to be relevant to economic and social processes through their outputs but their actions are scattered.","PeriodicalId":275253,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing the Operational Research/Management Science System: Insights from Small Academic Communities in the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"M. Kunc\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2805103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The OR/MS system has multiple actors located in diverse communities: industry (end users), consulting and academia (education research). The main flows between communities in the system are based on the exchange of problems for solutions using diverse knowledge stocks (e.g. mathematics, statistics, systems thinking) as well as the movement of graduates. However, there are disagreements on the views about the OR/MS system as well as issues that have affected the OR/MS field in recent years reducing its relative stance within the rest of disciplines, students and managers. This paper proposes a framework based on a set of activities within OR/MS communities and offer a set of multidimensional measures that can be employed to evaluate the communities over time providing additional evidence for the discussion about the development of OR/MS. Five OR communities located in five universities in the United Kingdom are employed to explore the state of the OR communities using the framework. The results confirm the existence of a broad spectrum and applicability of research in diverse fields but the broad spectrum is somehow diluted among subject areas and not captured by traditional OR perspectives. The findings show a declining position in business schools, dispersion of practitioners and OR graduates, who are not linked to OR communities. Professional societies may need to find synergies with other societies in close subject areas. OR communities attempt to be relevant to economic and social processes through their outputs but their actions are scattered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research eJournal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2805103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2805103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

OR/MS系统有位于不同社区的多个参与者:工业(最终用户)、咨询和学术界(教育研究)。系统中社区之间的主要流动是基于使用不同知识储备(如数学、统计、系统思维)交换问题以寻求解决方案以及毕业生的流动。然而,对OR/MS系统的看法以及近年来影响OR/MS领域的问题存在分歧,降低了OR/MS在其他学科、学生和管理者中的相对地位。本文提出了一个基于OR/MS社区内一系列活动的框架,并提供了一套多维度的措施,可用于随着时间的推移评估社区,为讨论OR/MS的发展提供了额外的证据。位于英国五所大学的五个OR社区使用该框架来探索OR社区的状态。结果证实了广谱的存在和研究在不同领域的适用性,但广谱在某种程度上被学科领域所稀释,而不是被传统的OR观点所捕获。调查结果显示,商学院的地位不断下降,从业人员和OR毕业生分散,他们与OR社区没有联系。专业学会可能需要在密切的学科领域与其他学会寻求协同增效。OR社区试图通过其产出与经济和社会进程相关,但他们的行动是分散的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysing the Operational Research/Management Science System: Insights from Small Academic Communities in the United Kingdom
The OR/MS system has multiple actors located in diverse communities: industry (end users), consulting and academia (education research). The main flows between communities in the system are based on the exchange of problems for solutions using diverse knowledge stocks (e.g. mathematics, statistics, systems thinking) as well as the movement of graduates. However, there are disagreements on the views about the OR/MS system as well as issues that have affected the OR/MS field in recent years reducing its relative stance within the rest of disciplines, students and managers. This paper proposes a framework based on a set of activities within OR/MS communities and offer a set of multidimensional measures that can be employed to evaluate the communities over time providing additional evidence for the discussion about the development of OR/MS. Five OR communities located in five universities in the United Kingdom are employed to explore the state of the OR communities using the framework. The results confirm the existence of a broad spectrum and applicability of research in diverse fields but the broad spectrum is somehow diluted among subject areas and not captured by traditional OR perspectives. The findings show a declining position in business schools, dispersion of practitioners and OR graduates, who are not linked to OR communities. Professional societies may need to find synergies with other societies in close subject areas. OR communities attempt to be relevant to economic and social processes through their outputs but their actions are scattered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Performance of Certainty-equivalent Pricing Optimal Policies for a Multi-Echelon Inventory Problem with Service Time Target and Expediting Robust Epidemiological Prediction and Optimization Strategic Alliances and Lending Relationships Role of Production Efficiency: Inventory Leanness and Financial Outcome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1