政府干预、多元化与企业绩效:基于内生调查

Gebing Sun, Hu Pei
{"title":"政府干预、多元化与企业绩效:基于内生调查","authors":"Gebing Sun, Hu Pei","doi":"10.1109/ICEE.2010.1026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Applying Simultaneous Equation Models With the data of publicly listed firms in china from 2001 to 2008, the paper analyses the performance of diversification based on the dual features of the government intervention and the endogeneity of Diversification. the empirical results indicate that diversification discount change into a significant diversification premium. In addition, government-controlled multisegment firms have lower MV/BV in average than non-government-controlled multi- segment firms while government-controlled single- segment firms have higher MV/Bv in average than non-government-controlled multi-segment firms. Overall, government intervention is not always Grabbing-Hand.","PeriodicalId":420284,"journal":{"name":"2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Government Intervention, Diversification and Firm Performance: Based on the Endogenous Investigation\",\"authors\":\"Gebing Sun, Hu Pei\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICEE.2010.1026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Applying Simultaneous Equation Models With the data of publicly listed firms in china from 2001 to 2008, the paper analyses the performance of diversification based on the dual features of the government intervention and the endogeneity of Diversification. the empirical results indicate that diversification discount change into a significant diversification premium. In addition, government-controlled multisegment firms have lower MV/BV in average than non-government-controlled multi- segment firms while government-controlled single- segment firms have higher MV/Bv in average than non-government-controlled multi-segment firms. Overall, government intervention is not always Grabbing-Hand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":420284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE.2010.1026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEE.2010.1026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文利用2001 - 2008年中国上市公司的数据,基于政府干预和多元化内生性的双重特征,分析了多元化的绩效。实证结果表明,多元化贴现转变为显著的多元化溢价。此外,政府控制的多部门企业的平均MV/BV低于非政府控制的多部门企业,而政府控制的单一部门企业的平均MV/BV高于非政府控制的多部门企业。总的来说,政府干预并不总是“强取强夺”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Government Intervention, Diversification and Firm Performance: Based on the Endogenous Investigation
Applying Simultaneous Equation Models With the data of publicly listed firms in china from 2001 to 2008, the paper analyses the performance of diversification based on the dual features of the government intervention and the endogeneity of Diversification. the empirical results indicate that diversification discount change into a significant diversification premium. In addition, government-controlled multisegment firms have lower MV/BV in average than non-government-controlled multi- segment firms while government-controlled single- segment firms have higher MV/Bv in average than non-government-controlled multi-segment firms. Overall, government intervention is not always Grabbing-Hand.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computer Aided Management of Bilingual Course Materials Notice of RetractionCharacteristics of Enterprise Training and the Comparison with Academic Education Object Management and Performance Assessment Model Design in University: Taking a University as an Example Notice of RetractionIndustrial Policy Analysis on Low-carbon Economic Development Empirical Study on FDI, International Trade and Economic Growth in Chongqing Based on VAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1