Mohamed Azam Mohamed Adil
{"title":"Hak untuk Hidup dan Hukuman Mati: Respons Syariah terhadap Perundangan Antarabangsa","authors":"Mohamed Azam Mohamed Adil","doi":"10.54313/journalmp.v2i.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The right to life is one of the fundamental aspects of human rights. Without this right, people risk losing other rights, such as freedom of religion, freedom of speech and opinion, freedom of movement, property ownership rights, and many more. Protecting the right to life is foundational to the building of civilisation, without it, it is impossible to sustain a civilised culture and achieve technological advancement. Hence, jurists and philosophers are unanimous in considering this right to be inalienable and non-negotiable. While Syariah recognises the right to life of each and every human, it also posits that humankind is the prize of God’s creation. Because humans were created by God, a human’s right to life ultimately belongs to God. For God gives life, and He is the one who takes it back. Therefore, human lives are sacred, according to the Syariah, and it is a crime to take another human’s life without a just cause. In this regard, Syariah has prescribed retaliation (qisas) that prescribes the death penalty for intentional murder. This article examines the human right to life from both perspectives of Islam and the Federal Constitution. It also analyses the position of the death penalty in the legal context in Malaysia and the Shariah’s view. This paper also examines the demands of international law on the abolition of the death penalty and what the Shariah response is in this regard.","PeriodicalId":164136,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Malaysian Parliament","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Malaysian Parliament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54313/journalmp.v2i.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生命权是人权的一个基本方面。没有这项权利,人们就有可能失去其他权利,如宗教自由、言论和意见自由、行动自由、财产所有权等等。保护生命权是文明建设的基础,没有生命权,文明文化就无法持久,科技进步就无法实现。因此,法学家和哲学家一致认为这项权利是不可剥夺和不可转让的。虽然伊斯兰教承认每个人都有生命的权利,但它也假定人类是上帝创造的奖赏。因为人是上帝创造的,所以人的生存权最终属于上帝。因为神使人得生命、自己也要取回来。因此,根据伊斯兰教法,人的生命是神圣的,没有正当理由夺取他人的生命是一种犯罪行为。在这方面,伊斯兰教法规定了报复(qisas),规定对故意谋杀判处死刑。本文从伊斯兰教和联邦宪法两方面考察生命权。报告还分析了死刑在马来西亚法律环境中的地位和伊斯兰教法的观点。本文还探讨了国际法对废除死刑的要求以及伊斯兰教法在这方面的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hak untuk Hidup dan Hukuman Mati: Respons Syariah terhadap Perundangan Antarabangsa
The right to life is one of the fundamental aspects of human rights. Without this right, people risk losing other rights, such as freedom of religion, freedom of speech and opinion, freedom of movement, property ownership rights, and many more. Protecting the right to life is foundational to the building of civilisation, without it, it is impossible to sustain a civilised culture and achieve technological advancement. Hence, jurists and philosophers are unanimous in considering this right to be inalienable and non-negotiable. While Syariah recognises the right to life of each and every human, it also posits that humankind is the prize of God’s creation. Because humans were created by God, a human’s right to life ultimately belongs to God. For God gives life, and He is the one who takes it back. Therefore, human lives are sacred, according to the Syariah, and it is a crime to take another human’s life without a just cause. In this regard, Syariah has prescribed retaliation (qisas) that prescribes the death penalty for intentional murder. This article examines the human right to life from both perspectives of Islam and the Federal Constitution. It also analyses the position of the death penalty in the legal context in Malaysia and the Shariah’s view. This paper also examines the demands of international law on the abolition of the death penalty and what the Shariah response is in this regard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hak Negeri Melayu ke Atas Pelantar Benua: Kajian Kes Malaysia Mengikut Analisis Jurisprudens Watan Pengukuhan Perkhidmatan Penyelidikan Bagi Keberkesanan Parlimen Parliamentarians & Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships in Implementing SDGs: In 57 Parliamentary Constituencies (Between 2020 and 2022) during the 14th Parliamentary Session Sistem Jawatankuasa Pilihan Khas di Dewan Rakyat, Parlimen Malaysia: Penilaian Kritikal terhadap Instrumen Semak dan Imbang Legislatif 'Yang Indah-Indah', Bahasa dan Ideologi dalam Pantun Perbahasan Parlimen Ke-14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1