{"title":"罗马尼亚宪法审查中国内法、国际法和欧洲法之间的关系","authors":"T. Toader, Marieta Safta","doi":"10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Constitutional Court has ruled that, by adhering to the legal order of the \nEuropean Union, Romania agreed that, in those areas where exclusive jurisdiction is \nconferred on the European Union, regardless of the international treaties priorly signed, \nimplementation of its obligations arising therefrom is subject to the rules of the \nEuropean Union. Otherwise, this would result in the undesirable situation where, \nthrough bi or multilateral internationally assumed obligations, Member State would \nseriously affect the Union’s competence and, in practice, would act in its place in the \naforementioned areas. For this reason, in the field of competition, any State aid falls \nwithin the competence of the European Commission and appeal proceedings fall within \nthe jurisdiction of the European Union. Therefore, pursuant to Article 11 para. (1) and \nArticle 148 para. (2) and (4) of the Constitution, Romania applies in good faith the \nobligations resulting from the Accession Instrument, without interfering with the \nexclusive competence of the European Union and, by virtue of the compliance clause \ncontained in the text of Article 148 of the Constitution, Romania cannot adopt a \nlegislative act contrary to the obligations assumed as a Member State. All those already \nhighlighted are subject to certain limitations, expressed in what the Court described as \n“national constitutional identity”.","PeriodicalId":421528,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between national, international and European law within the constitutional review in Romania\",\"authors\":\"T. Toader, Marieta Safta\",\"doi\":\"10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Constitutional Court has ruled that, by adhering to the legal order of the \\nEuropean Union, Romania agreed that, in those areas where exclusive jurisdiction is \\nconferred on the European Union, regardless of the international treaties priorly signed, \\nimplementation of its obligations arising therefrom is subject to the rules of the \\nEuropean Union. Otherwise, this would result in the undesirable situation where, \\nthrough bi or multilateral internationally assumed obligations, Member State would \\nseriously affect the Union’s competence and, in practice, would act in its place in the \\naforementioned areas. For this reason, in the field of competition, any State aid falls \\nwithin the competence of the European Commission and appeal proceedings fall within \\nthe jurisdiction of the European Union. Therefore, pursuant to Article 11 para. (1) and \\nArticle 148 para. (2) and (4) of the Constitution, Romania applies in good faith the \\nobligations resulting from the Accession Instrument, without interfering with the \\nexclusive competence of the European Union and, by virtue of the compliance clause \\ncontained in the text of Article 148 of the Constitution, Romania cannot adopt a \\nlegislative act contrary to the obligations assumed as a Member State. All those already \\nhighlighted are subject to certain limitations, expressed in what the Court described as \\n“national constitutional identity”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Drept Constituțional\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Drept Constituțional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47743/rdc-2016-1-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relationship between national, international and European law within the constitutional review in Romania
The Constitutional Court has ruled that, by adhering to the legal order of the
European Union, Romania agreed that, in those areas where exclusive jurisdiction is
conferred on the European Union, regardless of the international treaties priorly signed,
implementation of its obligations arising therefrom is subject to the rules of the
European Union. Otherwise, this would result in the undesirable situation where,
through bi or multilateral internationally assumed obligations, Member State would
seriously affect the Union’s competence and, in practice, would act in its place in the
aforementioned areas. For this reason, in the field of competition, any State aid falls
within the competence of the European Commission and appeal proceedings fall within
the jurisdiction of the European Union. Therefore, pursuant to Article 11 para. (1) and
Article 148 para. (2) and (4) of the Constitution, Romania applies in good faith the
obligations resulting from the Accession Instrument, without interfering with the
exclusive competence of the European Union and, by virtue of the compliance clause
contained in the text of Article 148 of the Constitution, Romania cannot adopt a
legislative act contrary to the obligations assumed as a Member State. All those already
highlighted are subject to certain limitations, expressed in what the Court described as
“national constitutional identity”.